Adapted Sports-Based Games With Cooperative and Competitive Approaches on Social and Motor Skills in Early Primary School Students.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Natacha Ojeda-Troncoso, Kevin Campos-Campos
{"title":"Adapted Sports-Based Games With Cooperative and Competitive Approaches on Social and Motor Skills in Early Primary School Students.","authors":"Natacha Ojeda-Troncoso, Kevin Campos-Campos","doi":"10.1177/00315125251342622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Play is crucial in acquiring and enhancing life skills (e.g., teamwork, collaboration, leadership, decision-making, responsibility, commitment, empathy). During childhood and adolescence, free play is essential for comprehensive development. As individuals mature, play evolves, gaining purpose and direction. Motor games include activities that promote large and small movements, balance, coordination, and strength, while sensory play stimulates the senses. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of play, applied through adapted sports (AS), with a focus on cooperative (CE) and competitive (CPE) approaches in strengthening the social (SS) and motor skills (MS) of primary school children in the first cycle of primary school (7.61 ± 0.33 years). This study employed a quasi-experimental design with a descriptive scope. An 8-session program was implemented, during which motor and sensory games based on AS were developed for elementary school students. The interventions were distributed into two groups: one that received a CE and another that received a CPE. The TGMD-2 test was used to assess motor skills, and the Social Interaction Skills Questionnaire (CHIS) was utilized. The CE group was more effective than the CPE group in motor skills (Δ = 11.48 in favor of CE over CPE) and social skills (Δ = 11.15 in favor of CE over CPE). Students who participated in cooperative approach group demonstrated an improvement in motor skills (pre = 15.04 ± 4.46; post = 19.88 ± 3.64; p=<0.001; Δ = 39.21) and social skills (pre = 231.44 ± 35.69; post = 252.84 ± 27.73; p=<0.001; Δ = 10.13), whereas the competitive approach group showed improvement only in motor skills (pre = 14.08 ± 3.99; post = 17.28 ± 3.42; p=<0.001; Δ = 27.73). The implementation of an AS program showed differentiated effects depending on the applied approach. CE activities favored the development of SS and MS, while CPE activities improved motor skills in students. This suggests the importance of combining both approaches to promote holistic development in students.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"315125251342622"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251342622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Play is crucial in acquiring and enhancing life skills (e.g., teamwork, collaboration, leadership, decision-making, responsibility, commitment, empathy). During childhood and adolescence, free play is essential for comprehensive development. As individuals mature, play evolves, gaining purpose and direction. Motor games include activities that promote large and small movements, balance, coordination, and strength, while sensory play stimulates the senses. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of play, applied through adapted sports (AS), with a focus on cooperative (CE) and competitive (CPE) approaches in strengthening the social (SS) and motor skills (MS) of primary school children in the first cycle of primary school (7.61 ± 0.33 years). This study employed a quasi-experimental design with a descriptive scope. An 8-session program was implemented, during which motor and sensory games based on AS were developed for elementary school students. The interventions were distributed into two groups: one that received a CE and another that received a CPE. The TGMD-2 test was used to assess motor skills, and the Social Interaction Skills Questionnaire (CHIS) was utilized. The CE group was more effective than the CPE group in motor skills (Δ = 11.48 in favor of CE over CPE) and social skills (Δ = 11.15 in favor of CE over CPE). Students who participated in cooperative approach group demonstrated an improvement in motor skills (pre = 15.04 ± 4.46; post = 19.88 ± 3.64; p=<0.001; Δ = 39.21) and social skills (pre = 231.44 ± 35.69; post = 252.84 ± 27.73; p=<0.001; Δ = 10.13), whereas the competitive approach group showed improvement only in motor skills (pre = 14.08 ± 3.99; post = 17.28 ± 3.42; p=<0.001; Δ = 27.73). The implementation of an AS program showed differentiated effects depending on the applied approach. CE activities favored the development of SS and MS, while CPE activities improved motor skills in students. This suggests the importance of combining both approaches to promote holistic development in students.

采用合作和竞争方法的适应性体育游戏对小学生社交和运动技能的影响。
游戏对于获得和提高生活技能(例如,团队合作、协作、领导、决策、责任、承诺、同理心)至关重要。在儿童和青少年时期,自由玩耍对全面发展至关重要。随着个体的成熟,游戏也会进化,获得目标和方向。运动游戏包括促进大小运动、平衡、协调和力量的活动,而感官游戏则刺激感官。本研究的目的是比较适应运动(AS)与合作(CE)和竞争(CPE)方法在加强小学第一阶段(7.61±0.33岁)小学生社交(SS)和运动技能(MS)方面的效果。本研究采用准实验设计,具有描述性范围。实施了一个8课时的项目,在此期间,针对小学生开发了基于AS的运动和感官游戏。干预措施被分为两组:一组接受CE,另一组接受CPE。运动技能采用TGMD-2测验,社会互动技能问卷(CHIS)。在运动技能(Δ = 11.48, CE优于CPE)和社交技能(Δ = 11.15, CE优于CPE)方面,CE组比CPE组更有效。参与合作方法组的学生在运动技能方面表现出改善(前值= 15.04±4.46;后= 19.88±3.64;p =
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信