Amrit Kirpalani, Joanne Grimmer, Peter Zhan Tao Wang
{"title":"Exploring Medical Student Trust in Generative Artificial Intelligence (ChatGPT) Versus Peers in Team-Based Learning.","authors":"Amrit Kirpalani, Joanne Grimmer, Peter Zhan Tao Wang","doi":"10.1007/s40670-025-02289-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored the impact of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated responses from ChatGPT on medical students' decision-making and the effectiveness of group discussions in correcting AI-induced misconceptions. Forty students responded to clinical cases in three phases: independently, after reviewing AI answers, and post-group discussions. Students' responses demonstrated a significant shift to match those provided by ChatGPT, whether or not these were correct. Group discussions did not correct misinformation from AI. The findings not only highlight the potential of AI to influence medical students' decision-making but also emphasize the need for critical assessment and guidance around responsible use of AI in medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":37113,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Educator","volume":"35 2","pages":"671-674"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12058617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-025-02289-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explored the impact of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated responses from ChatGPT on medical students' decision-making and the effectiveness of group discussions in correcting AI-induced misconceptions. Forty students responded to clinical cases in three phases: independently, after reviewing AI answers, and post-group discussions. Students' responses demonstrated a significant shift to match those provided by ChatGPT, whether or not these were correct. Group discussions did not correct misinformation from AI. The findings not only highlight the potential of AI to influence medical students' decision-making but also emphasize the need for critical assessment and guidance around responsible use of AI in medical education.
期刊介绍:
Medical Science Educator is the successor of the journal JIAMSE. It is the peer-reviewed publication of the International Association of Medical Science Educators (IAMSE). The Journal offers all who teach in healthcare the most current information to succeed in their task by publishing scholarly activities, opinions, and resources in medical science education. Published articles focus on teaching the sciences fundamental to modern medicine and health, and include basic science education, clinical teaching, and the use of modern education technologies. The Journal provides the readership a better understanding of teaching and learning techniques in order to advance medical science education.