Use of magnetic resonance structural imaging to identify disease progression in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A voxel-based morphometry and surface-based morphometry study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Zihan Zhang, Jiaxuan Peng, Yuan Shao, Xiaotian Li, Yuyun Xu, Qiaowei Song, Yelei Xie, Zhenyu Shu
{"title":"Use of magnetic resonance structural imaging to identify disease progression in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A voxel-based morphometry and surface-based morphometry study.","authors":"Zihan Zhang, Jiaxuan Peng, Yuan Shao, Xiaotian Li, Yuyun Xu, Qiaowei Song, Yelei Xie, Zhenyu Shu","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.04.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and surface-based morphometry (SBM) based on magnetic resonance structural imaging were used to identify disease progression in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 154 MCI patients from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, with 62 patients classified into the progressive MCI (pMCI) group and 92 patients into the stable MCI (sMCI) group. VBM and SBM were employed to identify structural differences between sMCI and pMCI patients, and differential features were extracted for model construction. The logistic regression method was used to establish relevant index models, and the DeLong test was used to compare the diagnostic performance of the different models. Additionally, 51 patients from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) database were used as an external validation set to further validate the clinical efficacy of the model. Significant structural differences between pMCI and sMCI patients were revealed through VBM and SBM analyses. Volume reductions were observed in the frontal and temporal lobes, and cortical thinning occurred in the left inferior and superior parietal cortices. Reduced gyrification was observed in the bilateral insular gyrus. The structural joint model, which combines volume and cortical indices, demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy compared to the joint scale index model that combines the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) indices. The findings indicate that combined VBM and SBM analysis offers a sensitive and noninvasive approach to detect structural biomarkers of MCI progression, providing a practical tool for early risk stratification and personalized clinical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19142,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.04.031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and surface-based morphometry (SBM) based on magnetic resonance structural imaging were used to identify disease progression in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 154 MCI patients from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, with 62 patients classified into the progressive MCI (pMCI) group and 92 patients into the stable MCI (sMCI) group. VBM and SBM were employed to identify structural differences between sMCI and pMCI patients, and differential features were extracted for model construction. The logistic regression method was used to establish relevant index models, and the DeLong test was used to compare the diagnostic performance of the different models. Additionally, 51 patients from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) database were used as an external validation set to further validate the clinical efficacy of the model. Significant structural differences between pMCI and sMCI patients were revealed through VBM and SBM analyses. Volume reductions were observed in the frontal and temporal lobes, and cortical thinning occurred in the left inferior and superior parietal cortices. Reduced gyrification was observed in the bilateral insular gyrus. The structural joint model, which combines volume and cortical indices, demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy compared to the joint scale index model that combines the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) indices. The findings indicate that combined VBM and SBM analysis offers a sensitive and noninvasive approach to detect structural biomarkers of MCI progression, providing a practical tool for early risk stratification and personalized clinical management.

使用磁共振结构成像识别轻度认知障碍患者的疾病进展:基于体素的形态测量和基于表面的形态测量研究
使用基于体素的形态测量(VBM)和基于磁共振结构成像的表面形态测量(SBM)来识别轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者的疾病进展。回顾性分析来自阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议(ADNI)数据库的154例MCI患者,其中62例患者分为进行性MCI (pMCI)组,92例患者分为稳定型MCI (sMCI)组。采用VBM和SBM识别sMCI和pMCI患者的结构差异,并提取差异特征用于模型构建。采用logistic回归方法建立相关指标模型,并采用DeLong检验比较不同模型的诊断性能。此外,从国家阿尔茨海默病协调中心(National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center, NACC)数据库中选取51例患者作为外部验证集,进一步验证该模型的临床疗效。通过VBM和SBM分析,pMCI和sMCI患者的结构存在显著差异。额叶和颞叶体积减少,左侧顶叶和顶叶皮层变薄。双侧岛回的旋回减少。结合体积和皮质指数的结构关节模型与结合迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MOCA)指数的关节量表指数模型相比,显示出更高的诊断准确性。研究结果表明,结合VBM和SBM分析为检测MCI进展的结构性生物标志物提供了一种敏感且无创的方法,为早期风险分层和个性化临床管理提供了实用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroscience
Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
394
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Neuroscience publishes papers describing the results of original research on any aspect of the scientific study of the nervous system. Any paper, however short, will be considered for publication provided that it reports significant, new and carefully confirmed findings with full experimental details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信