Not Losing Momentum: Cross-Sectional Insights into Ibogaine Clinical Trials.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Damian Swieczkowski, Aleksander Kwaśny, Krzysztof Sadko, Wiesław Jerzy Cubała
{"title":"Not Losing Momentum: Cross-Sectional Insights into Ibogaine Clinical Trials.","authors":"Damian Swieczkowski, Aleksander Kwaśny, Krzysztof Sadko, Wiesław Jerzy Cubała","doi":"10.1080/02791072.2025.2491385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ibogaine, a non-classical psychedelic, has gained increasing attention as a potential treatment for substance use disorders (SUD); however, a lack of commercial interest and safety-related concerns limit its clinical development. This cross-sectional study investigates the current landscape of clinical trials involving ibogaine, a non-classical psychedelic, focusing on its safety and efficacy. We extracted data from ClinicalTrials.Gov, EU Clinical Trials (https://euclinicaltrials.eu/), the EU Clinical Trials Register (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/), and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (World Health Organization). After rigorous screening and deduplication, we analyzed nine trials. Our findings revealed considerable variability in methodologies, including fixed-dose and ascending-dose designs, diverse inclusion and exclusion criteria, and differing primary and secondary outcomes. Early-phase trials dominate, primarily focusing on pharmacokinetics, withdrawal symptom reduction, and safety monitoring. Key findings indicate significant differences in how safety concerns are addressed, particularly regarding ibogaine's cardiovascular risk. While preliminary evidence suggests potential therapeutic benefits, the absence of large-scale, late-phase trials limits definitive conclusions. Our study underscores the need for a standardized clinical framework to ensure reliable assessments of ibogaine's efficacy and safety. Lessons from research on classical psychedelics, and MDMA could help improve trial design and reduce issues related to blinding and expectancy bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":16902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2025.2491385","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ibogaine, a non-classical psychedelic, has gained increasing attention as a potential treatment for substance use disorders (SUD); however, a lack of commercial interest and safety-related concerns limit its clinical development. This cross-sectional study investigates the current landscape of clinical trials involving ibogaine, a non-classical psychedelic, focusing on its safety and efficacy. We extracted data from ClinicalTrials.Gov, EU Clinical Trials (https://euclinicaltrials.eu/), the EU Clinical Trials Register (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/), and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (World Health Organization). After rigorous screening and deduplication, we analyzed nine trials. Our findings revealed considerable variability in methodologies, including fixed-dose and ascending-dose designs, diverse inclusion and exclusion criteria, and differing primary and secondary outcomes. Early-phase trials dominate, primarily focusing on pharmacokinetics, withdrawal symptom reduction, and safety monitoring. Key findings indicate significant differences in how safety concerns are addressed, particularly regarding ibogaine's cardiovascular risk. While preliminary evidence suggests potential therapeutic benefits, the absence of large-scale, late-phase trials limits definitive conclusions. Our study underscores the need for a standardized clinical framework to ensure reliable assessments of ibogaine's efficacy and safety. Lessons from research on classical psychedelics, and MDMA could help improve trial design and reduce issues related to blinding and expectancy bias.

不失势头:伊博加因临床试验的横断面洞察。
伊博加因是一种非经典致幻剂,作为药物使用障碍(SUD)的潜在治疗方法而受到越来越多的关注;然而,缺乏商业利益和安全相关的担忧限制了其临床发展。本横断面研究调查了伊博加因(一种非经典致幻剂)临床试验的现状,重点关注其安全性和有效性。我们从ClinicalTrials中提取数据。Gov、欧盟临床试验(https://euclinicaltrials.eu/)、欧盟临床试验注册(https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/)和国际临床试验注册平台(世界卫生组织)。经过严格的筛选和重复数据删除,我们分析了9个试验。我们的研究结果显示,在方法上存在相当大的差异,包括固定剂量和上升剂量设计、不同的纳入和排除标准以及不同的主要和次要结局。早期试验占主导地位,主要关注药代动力学、戒断症状减轻和安全性监测。主要研究结果表明,在如何解决安全问题方面存在重大差异,特别是在伊博加因的心血管风险方面。虽然初步证据表明潜在的治疗益处,但缺乏大规模的后期试验限制了明确的结论。我们的研究强调需要一个标准化的临床框架,以确保对伊博加因的疗效和安全性进行可靠的评估。从经典致幻剂和MDMA的研究中得到的教训可以帮助改进试验设计,减少与盲法和预期偏差相关的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信