Using UNICEF's Early Child Development Index 2030 to Identify Young Children With Significant Cognitive Delay.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Eric Emerson, Gwynnyth Llewellyn
{"title":"Using UNICEF's Early Child Development Index 2030 to Identify Young Children With Significant Cognitive Delay.","authors":"Eric Emerson, Gwynnyth Llewellyn","doi":"10.1111/jir.13245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To help redress the global bias of intellectual disability research drawing on high-income countries, previous studies have used data from UNICEF's Early Child Development Index (ECDI) to create an indicator of Significant Cognitive Delay (SCD) in young children. Recently, UNICEF have replaced the ECDI with an updated 20-item version; the ECDI2030. Our aim was to investigate the utility of using ECDI2030 data to provide a more robust measure of SCD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted secondary analysis of ECDI2030 data on 92 506 2-4-year-old children from 23 nationally representative surveys undertaken primarily in the world's poorer countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 11 learning items of the ECDI2030 showed good internal consistency overall and in each of the participating countries. Using age-specific cut-points for SCD generated from 20 013 children in nine countries with high Human Development Index (HDI) scores produced country-level estimates of the prevalence of SCD that ranged from 1.1% to 34.1%. These prevalence estimates showed a strong relationship with both country HDI score and national wealth. Increased within country risk of SCD was independently associated with male gender, lower relative household wealth, lower level of maternal education and non-enrolment in early childhood educational programmes. Comparison with SCD based on the older ECDI indicated that the two versions correlated very highly, although the newer version produced slightly higher prevalence estimates than the previous version.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ECDI2030 is being used in Round 7 of UNICEF's Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys which are currently underway in 46 countries and in a growing number of USAID funded Demographic Health Surveys. Individual-level data from surveys are freely available to researchers. As data from these surveys begin to be released, they will provide a highly cost-efficient way to redress the current bias in intellectual and developmental disabilities research toward high-income countries and to understand the of children at risk of intellectual disability or global developmental delay in the world's poorer countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.13245","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To help redress the global bias of intellectual disability research drawing on high-income countries, previous studies have used data from UNICEF's Early Child Development Index (ECDI) to create an indicator of Significant Cognitive Delay (SCD) in young children. Recently, UNICEF have replaced the ECDI with an updated 20-item version; the ECDI2030. Our aim was to investigate the utility of using ECDI2030 data to provide a more robust measure of SCD.

Method: We conducted secondary analysis of ECDI2030 data on 92 506 2-4-year-old children from 23 nationally representative surveys undertaken primarily in the world's poorer countries.

Results: The 11 learning items of the ECDI2030 showed good internal consistency overall and in each of the participating countries. Using age-specific cut-points for SCD generated from 20 013 children in nine countries with high Human Development Index (HDI) scores produced country-level estimates of the prevalence of SCD that ranged from 1.1% to 34.1%. These prevalence estimates showed a strong relationship with both country HDI score and national wealth. Increased within country risk of SCD was independently associated with male gender, lower relative household wealth, lower level of maternal education and non-enrolment in early childhood educational programmes. Comparison with SCD based on the older ECDI indicated that the two versions correlated very highly, although the newer version produced slightly higher prevalence estimates than the previous version.

Conclusion: The ECDI2030 is being used in Round 7 of UNICEF's Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys which are currently underway in 46 countries and in a growing number of USAID funded Demographic Health Surveys. Individual-level data from surveys are freely available to researchers. As data from these surveys begin to be released, they will provide a highly cost-efficient way to redress the current bias in intellectual and developmental disabilities research toward high-income countries and to understand the of children at risk of intellectual disability or global developmental delay in the world's poorer countries.

使用联合国儿童基金会的《2030年早期儿童发展指数》来识别有显著认知迟缓的幼儿。
背景:为了帮助纠正高收入国家智力残疾研究的全球偏见,之前的研究使用了联合国儿童基金会早期儿童发展指数(ECDI)的数据来创建幼儿显著认知延迟(SCD)的指标。最近,儿童基金会用更新的20个项目的版本取代了经济发展指标;ECDI2030。我们的目的是研究使用ECDI2030数据的效用,以提供更可靠的SCD测量方法。方法:我们对来自23个主要在世界较贫穷国家进行的具有全国代表性的调查的92 506名2-4岁儿童的ECDI2030数据进行了二次分析。结果:ECDI2030的11个学习项目在总体和各参与国均表现出良好的内部一致性。利用来自9个人类发展指数(HDI)得分较高的国家的2013名儿童的SCD年龄特异性切割点,得出了SCD患病率的国家水平估计,范围从1.1%到34.1%。这些流行率估计值显示了与国家人类发展指数得分和国民财富的密切关系。国内SCD风险的增加与男性性别、较低的相对家庭财富、较低的母亲教育水平和未参加幼儿教育计划独立相关。与基于旧ECDI的SCD比较表明,两种版本的相关性非常高,尽管新版本的患病率估计略高于旧版本。结论:联合国儿童基金会目前正在46个国家进行的第七轮多指标类集调查以及美国国际开发署资助的越来越多的人口健康调查正在使用《2030年可持续发展目标》。研究人员可以免费获得来自调查的个人层面数据。随着这些调查的数据开始公布,它们将提供一种极具成本效益的方法,以纠正目前智力和发育障碍研究对高收入国家的偏见,并了解世界上较贫穷国家面临智力残疾或全球发育迟缓风险的儿童的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信