Endoscopic Decompression Combined With Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for AOSpine A3 or A4 Thoracolumbar Fractures With Neurological Deficits: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurospine Pub Date : 2025-04-30 DOI:10.14245/ns.2449212.606
Huiming Yang, Junxian Miao, Jiangtao Wang, Dan Han, Yuhang Wang, Liang Yan, Biao Wang, Dingjun Hao
{"title":"Endoscopic Decompression Combined With Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for AOSpine A3 or A4 Thoracolumbar Fractures With Neurological Deficits: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Huiming Yang, Junxian Miao, Jiangtao Wang, Dan Han, Yuhang Wang, Liang Yan, Biao Wang, Dingjun Hao","doi":"10.14245/ns.2449212.606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with AOSpine A3 or A4 thoracolumbar fractures presenting with neurological deficits treated with endoscopic decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screws fixation (endoscopic minimally invasive surgery, EMIS) or conventional open surgery (OS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of patients with AOSpine A3 or A4 thoracolumbar fractures with neurological deficits who were treated with EMIS or OS between June 2019 and July 2021 were extracted from the electronic database. Various clinical outcomes were compared between the two cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 231 patients who were followed up for more than 2 years, 107 were in the EMIS cohort and 124 were in the OS cohort. Compared with the OS cohort, the EMIS cohort had longer operative time (P<0.05), but the intraoperative blood loss, incision length and hospital stay were significantly reduced (P<0.05). At both postoperative and final follow-up assessments, the EMIS cohort demonstrated significantly better Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) outcomes compared to the OS cohort (P<0.05). Both cohorts maintained similar correction of spinal canal erosion rate (CER), percentage of anterior vertebral height (AVH) and sagittal Cobb Angle (CA) after surgery and at the last follow-up (P>0.05). According to American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification, the two cohorts had similar neurological recovery at the last follow-up (P>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In comparison to OS, EMIS treatment for AOSpine A3 or A4 thoracolumbar fractures with neurological deficits has shown comparable clinical efficacy while significantly reducing surgical trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurospine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2449212.606","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with AOSpine A3 or A4 thoracolumbar fractures presenting with neurological deficits treated with endoscopic decompression combined with percutaneous pedicle screws fixation (endoscopic minimally invasive surgery, EMIS) or conventional open surgery (OS).

Methods: Data of patients with AOSpine A3 or A4 thoracolumbar fractures with neurological deficits who were treated with EMIS or OS between June 2019 and July 2021 were extracted from the electronic database. Various clinical outcomes were compared between the two cohorts.

Results: Among the 231 patients who were followed up for more than 2 years, 107 were in the EMIS cohort and 124 were in the OS cohort. Compared with the OS cohort, the EMIS cohort had longer operative time (P<0.05), but the intraoperative blood loss, incision length and hospital stay were significantly reduced (P<0.05). At both postoperative and final follow-up assessments, the EMIS cohort demonstrated significantly better Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) outcomes compared to the OS cohort (P<0.05). Both cohorts maintained similar correction of spinal canal erosion rate (CER), percentage of anterior vertebral height (AVH) and sagittal Cobb Angle (CA) after surgery and at the last follow-up (P>0.05). According to American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification, the two cohorts had similar neurological recovery at the last follow-up (P>0.05).

Conclusion: In comparison to OS, EMIS treatment for AOSpine A3 or A4 thoracolumbar fractures with neurological deficits has shown comparable clinical efficacy while significantly reducing surgical trauma.

内镜下减压联合经皮椎弓根螺钉固定治疗AOSpine A3或A4胸腰椎骨折伴神经功能缺损:一项回顾性队列研究
目的:本研究旨在比较内镜下减压联合经皮椎弓根螺钉固定(内镜下微创手术,EMIS)或常规开放手术(OS)治疗伴有神经功能缺损的AOSpine A3或A4胸腰椎骨折患者的临床疗效。方法:从电子数据库中提取2019年6月至2021年7月接受EMIS或OS治疗的AOSpine A3或A4胸腰椎骨折伴神经功能缺损患者的数据。比较两组患者的各种临床结果。结果:在随访2年以上的231例患者中,EMIS组107例,OS组124例。与OS组相比,EMIS组的手术时间更长(P0.05)。根据美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)的分类,两组患者在最后一次随访时神经恢复情况相似(P < 0.05)。结论:与OS相比,EMIS治疗AOSpine A3或A4胸腰椎骨折伴神经功能缺损具有相当的临床疗效,同时显著减少手术创伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurospine
Neurospine Multiple-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
18.80%
发文量
93
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信