Trajectories of Burden or Benefits of Caregiving Among Informal Caregivers of Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2025-02-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igaf014
Yongjing Ping, Jeremy Lim-Soh, Truls Østbye, Shamirah D/O A'Azman, Yong Ting, Rahul Malhotra
{"title":"Trajectories of Burden or Benefits of Caregiving Among Informal Caregivers of Older Adults: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Yongjing Ping, Jeremy Lim-Soh, Truls Østbye, Shamirah D/O A'Azman, Yong Ting, Rahul Malhotra","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igaf014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Informal caregiving for older adults can be both burdensome and beneficial. Given that the informal caregiving situation may evolve over time, and care needs of older adults can result from diverse health conditions, it is valuable to understand the trajectories of burden or benefits of caregiving and how these trajectories vary across health conditions common among older care-recipients. This review is the first to summarize the literature on trajectories of burden or benefits of caregiving, including caregiver and care-recipient characteristics associated with the trajectories.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We reviewed longitudinal observational quantitative studies, from 5 bibliographic databases, that assessed burden or benefits of caregiving at 3 or more time points among informal caregivers of older adults (60 years or above).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The narrative synthesis included 41 studies, with only 7 (17%) considering trajectories of benefits. A stable average trajectory of burden or benefits of caregiving was the most common pattern over time across various care-recipient health conditions. However, an increasing burden over time was primarily observed among caregivers of persons with dementia, while a decreasing burden was noted among caregivers of persons discharged from the hospital after an acute health event. Only 6 (10%) studies, which reported heterogeneity in the progression of burden or benefits separately or jointly, identified distinctive trajectories within the same set of caregivers. Risk factors consistently identified to be associated with trajectories indicating persistently higher burden or persistently lower benefits included more care-recipient functional limitations and behavioral problems, being a non-spousal caregiver, being a solo caregiver, and perceiving less self-efficacy or competence.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Future studies should focus on the trajectories of benefits of caregiving, untangle heterogeneity in trajectories of burden or benefits of caregiving, and consider both burden and benefits concurrently to identify factors that both enhance benefits and alleviate burden over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 4","pages":"igaf014"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986200/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Informal caregiving for older adults can be both burdensome and beneficial. Given that the informal caregiving situation may evolve over time, and care needs of older adults can result from diverse health conditions, it is valuable to understand the trajectories of burden or benefits of caregiving and how these trajectories vary across health conditions common among older care-recipients. This review is the first to summarize the literature on trajectories of burden or benefits of caregiving, including caregiver and care-recipient characteristics associated with the trajectories.

Research design and methods: We reviewed longitudinal observational quantitative studies, from 5 bibliographic databases, that assessed burden or benefits of caregiving at 3 or more time points among informal caregivers of older adults (60 years or above).

Results: The narrative synthesis included 41 studies, with only 7 (17%) considering trajectories of benefits. A stable average trajectory of burden or benefits of caregiving was the most common pattern over time across various care-recipient health conditions. However, an increasing burden over time was primarily observed among caregivers of persons with dementia, while a decreasing burden was noted among caregivers of persons discharged from the hospital after an acute health event. Only 6 (10%) studies, which reported heterogeneity in the progression of burden or benefits separately or jointly, identified distinctive trajectories within the same set of caregivers. Risk factors consistently identified to be associated with trajectories indicating persistently higher burden or persistently lower benefits included more care-recipient functional limitations and behavioral problems, being a non-spousal caregiver, being a solo caregiver, and perceiving less self-efficacy or competence.

Discussion and implications: Future studies should focus on the trajectories of benefits of caregiving, untangle heterogeneity in trajectories of burden or benefits of caregiving, and consider both burden and benefits concurrently to identify factors that both enhance benefits and alleviate burden over time.

老年人非正式照顾者的照顾负担或照顾收益轨迹:系统回顾。
背景和目的:对老年人的非正式照顾既繁重又有益。鉴于非正式照护情况可能随着时间的推移而演变,老年人的照护需求可能源于不同的健康状况,了解照护负担或益处的轨迹,以及这些轨迹在老年人接受照护者中常见的健康状况下如何变化,是有价值的。这篇综述是第一次总结文献的负担或照顾的利益的轨迹,包括照顾者和照顾接受者的特征相关的轨迹。研究设计和方法:我们回顾了来自5个文献数据库的纵向观察定量研究,这些研究评估了老年人(60岁或以上)非正式照顾者在3个或更多时间点的照顾负担或益处。结果:叙事综合包括41项研究,其中只有7项(17%)考虑了获益轨迹。随着时间的推移,护理负担或护理收益的稳定平均轨迹是各种护理接受者健康状况中最常见的模式。然而,随着时间的推移,主要观察到痴呆症患者的照顾者的负担增加,而在急性健康事件后出院者的照顾者的负担减少。只有6项(10%)研究单独或共同报告了负担或益处进展的异质性,确定了同一组护理人员的独特轨迹。与持续高负担或持续低收益轨迹相关的风险因素包括更多的照顾者功能限制和行为问题,非配偶照顾者,独自照顾者,自我效能感或能力感较低。讨论与启示:未来的研究应关注照顾利益的轨迹,理清照顾负担或照顾利益轨迹的异质性,并同时考虑照顾负担和照顾利益,以确定随着时间的推移既能提高照顾利益又能减轻负担的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信