Cate Bailey, Tessa Peasgood, Bernhard Michalowsky, Lidia Engel
{"title":"The psychometric performance of the EQ-HWB in caregivers of persons living with dementia.","authors":"Cate Bailey, Tessa Peasgood, Bernhard Michalowsky, Lidia Engel","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.04.2168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The EQ Health and Wellbeing (EQ-HWB) is a generic instrument recently developed for use in economic evaluations across public health and social care, including impacts on caregivers. Providing informal care to a person living with dementia can significantly impact the health and wellbeing of carers. However, it is unclear to what extent the EQ-HWB can capture such impacts. This project aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the EQ-HWB compared to other available instruments in caregivers of persons living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An online survey included demographics, informal care-related questions, and quality-of-life measures suitable for caregivers (C-DEMQOL and CarerQol) and the 25-item EQ-HWB. We used the UK pilot value set for the index-scores for the EQ-HWB-S (9-item short form). The psychometric properties of the EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S were assessed in terms of acceptability (missing data), response distribution, known-groups validity analysis using t-tests and one-way ANOVAs (Cohen's d and Eta-squared for effect size), convergent validity (Spearman correlations), and an exploration of dimensionality using exploratory factor analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In known-group validity analysis, the EQ-HWB instruments performed similarly to the C-DEMQOL in terms of effect sizes across a range of variables, and slightly better than the CarerQol on some variables. At the item level, 13 of the 25 items could discriminate respondents by caregiving time and 23 of 25 items by caregivers' general self-reported health. Most hypothesised correlations in convergent validity analysis were found to be above 0.3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that the EQ-HWB instruments performed well in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.04.2168","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The EQ Health and Wellbeing (EQ-HWB) is a generic instrument recently developed for use in economic evaluations across public health and social care, including impacts on caregivers. Providing informal care to a person living with dementia can significantly impact the health and wellbeing of carers. However, it is unclear to what extent the EQ-HWB can capture such impacts. This project aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the EQ-HWB compared to other available instruments in caregivers of persons living with dementia.
Method: An online survey included demographics, informal care-related questions, and quality-of-life measures suitable for caregivers (C-DEMQOL and CarerQol) and the 25-item EQ-HWB. We used the UK pilot value set for the index-scores for the EQ-HWB-S (9-item short form). The psychometric properties of the EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S were assessed in terms of acceptability (missing data), response distribution, known-groups validity analysis using t-tests and one-way ANOVAs (Cohen's d and Eta-squared for effect size), convergent validity (Spearman correlations), and an exploration of dimensionality using exploratory factor analysis.
Results: In known-group validity analysis, the EQ-HWB instruments performed similarly to the C-DEMQOL in terms of effect sizes across a range of variables, and slightly better than the CarerQol on some variables. At the item level, 13 of the 25 items could discriminate respondents by caregiving time and 23 of 25 items by caregivers' general self-reported health. Most hypothesised correlations in convergent validity analysis were found to be above 0.3.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that the EQ-HWB instruments performed well in this population.
期刊介绍:
Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.