The role of affect regulation in health behavior change.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Health Psychology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-17 DOI:10.1037/hea0001507
Michelle Z Yang, Mark Conner, Paschal Sheeran
{"title":"The role of affect regulation in health behavior change.","authors":"Michelle Z Yang, Mark Conner, Paschal Sheeran","doi":"10.1037/hea0001507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This research explores the relationship between affect regulation and health behavior change through two studies. Study 1 tested whether difficulties with affect regulation are associated with lower health-related behavioral intentions. Study 2 introduces the Calibrate and Qualify Model to examine the role of cognitive reappraisal in predicting health-related intentions and behavior. We posit that reappraisal could impact health behaviors either by shaping the favorability of health-related attitudes, norms, and perceived behavioral control, thereby increasing intentions and subsequently behavior (Calibrate Route) or by serving as a moderator, such that healthful cognitions better predict intentions and behavior at high levels of cognitive reappraisal (Qualify Route).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Study 1 was a cross-sectional study of 15 health behaviors (<i>N</i> = 319) that measured reasoned action approach (RAA) variables and difficulties in emotion regulation. Study 2 was a 3-month longitudinal study (<i>N</i> = 807) of eight health-related behaviors that tested the Calibrate and Qualify Model predictions using measures of cognitive reappraisal, RAA variables, and habit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Difficulties in emotion regulation, and limited access to affect regulation strategies in particular, predicted intentions to perform health behaviors (Study 1). Findings from Study 2 supported the Calibrate Route: cognitive reappraisal predicted intentions, and the reappraisal-intention relation was mediated by RAA variables. Supporting the Qualify Route, we observed a three-way interaction between habit, reappraisal, and intention, indicating that cognitive reappraisal combined with strong intentions attenuated the influence of habit on behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our research suggests that affect regulation is an important consideration for predicting and understanding health behaviors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55066,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"876-885"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001507","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This research explores the relationship between affect regulation and health behavior change through two studies. Study 1 tested whether difficulties with affect regulation are associated with lower health-related behavioral intentions. Study 2 introduces the Calibrate and Qualify Model to examine the role of cognitive reappraisal in predicting health-related intentions and behavior. We posit that reappraisal could impact health behaviors either by shaping the favorability of health-related attitudes, norms, and perceived behavioral control, thereby increasing intentions and subsequently behavior (Calibrate Route) or by serving as a moderator, such that healthful cognitions better predict intentions and behavior at high levels of cognitive reappraisal (Qualify Route).

Method: Study 1 was a cross-sectional study of 15 health behaviors (N = 319) that measured reasoned action approach (RAA) variables and difficulties in emotion regulation. Study 2 was a 3-month longitudinal study (N = 807) of eight health-related behaviors that tested the Calibrate and Qualify Model predictions using measures of cognitive reappraisal, RAA variables, and habit.

Results: Difficulties in emotion regulation, and limited access to affect regulation strategies in particular, predicted intentions to perform health behaviors (Study 1). Findings from Study 2 supported the Calibrate Route: cognitive reappraisal predicted intentions, and the reappraisal-intention relation was mediated by RAA variables. Supporting the Qualify Route, we observed a three-way interaction between habit, reappraisal, and intention, indicating that cognitive reappraisal combined with strong intentions attenuated the influence of habit on behavior.

Conclusions: Our research suggests that affect regulation is an important consideration for predicting and understanding health behaviors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

影响调节在健康行为改变中的作用。
目的:通过两项研究探讨情绪调节与健康行为改变之间的关系。研究1测试了情绪调节困难是否与较低的健康相关行为意愿相关。研究2引入了校准和合格模型来检验认知重评在预测与健康相关的意图和行为中的作用。我们假设,重新评估可以通过塑造与健康相关的态度、规范和感知行为控制的好感度来影响健康行为,从而增加意图和随后的行为(校准路径),或者通过作为调节因子,使健康认知更好地预测高水平认知重新评估的意图和行为(资格路径)。方法:研究1为15种健康行为(N = 319)的横断面研究,测量理性行为方法(RAA)变量和情绪调节困难。研究2是一项为期3个月的纵向研究(N = 807),研究了8种与健康相关的行为,使用认知重新评估、RAA变量和习惯的测量来测试校准和合格模型的预测。结果:情绪调节困难,特别是影响调节策略的获取有限,预测了健康行为的意向(研究1)。研究2的结果支持“校准路径”:认知重评价预测意向,重评价-意向的关系由RAA变量介导。支持资格路径,我们观察到习惯、重新评价和意图之间的三向交互作用,表明认知重新评价结合强烈的意图减弱了习惯对行为的影响。结论:我们的研究表明情绪调节是预测和理解健康行为的重要考虑因素。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology
Health Psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology publishes articles on psychological, biobehavioral, social, and environmental factors in physical health and medical illness, and other issues in health psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信