Beyond screen time: The core influences of problematic screen use on adolescent development networks.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Lin-Xuan Xu, Kun-Ru Song, Hui-Yin Deng, Xiao-Min Geng, Jia-Lin Zhang, Xiao-Yi Fang, Marc N Potenza, Jin-Tao Zhang
{"title":"Beyond screen time: The core influences of problematic screen use on adolescent development networks.","authors":"Lin-Xuan Xu, Kun-Ru Song, Hui-Yin Deng, Xiao-Min Geng, Jia-Lin Zhang, Xiao-Yi Fang, Marc N Potenza, Jin-Tao Zhang","doi":"10.1556/2006.2025.00035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>With surges in digital technologies, concerns over adolescents' screen use have intensified. Previous studies often relied on self-reported screen time, neglecting the experiential and motivational aspects of different screen activities (e.g. social media, gaming, and smartphones), possibly leading to heterogeneous associations. This study aimed to examine whether the severity of problematic screen use, conceptualized as a continuous measure of screen-related functional impairment, plays a more central role in development than self-reported screen time or phone-checking frequency, and to explore its influence within the broader adolescent ecosystem (i.e. family conflict, peer involvement, and school participation).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cohort data were obtained from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study Release 5.1. Screen use was obtained from self-report questionnaires, capturing both activity time and functional impairments. Among cross-sectional networks derived from 9,054 youth (4,272 girls, 47.18%) at 2-year follow-up (T2, ages 11-12 years) and 4,007 youth (1,896 girls, 47.32%) at 4-year follow-up (T4, ages 13-14 years), problematic use showed higher centrality than screen time and checking behavior, owing to stronger connections with behavioral tendencies. Cross-lagged-panel-network analyses of problematic use included 3,954 youth (1,863 girls, 47.12%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Problematic use exhibited high out-strength, which was associated with worsening psychopathologies and environmental conditions. Conversely, problematic use at T4 appeared less influenced by factors at T2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the pivotal role of problematic screen use, which showed greater centrality and stronger predictive effects on adolescent well-being than self-reported screen time, highlighting the need for policies and interventions addressing screen-related functional impairments to promote healthier screen habits in developing youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":15049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Addictions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Addictions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2025.00035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: With surges in digital technologies, concerns over adolescents' screen use have intensified. Previous studies often relied on self-reported screen time, neglecting the experiential and motivational aspects of different screen activities (e.g. social media, gaming, and smartphones), possibly leading to heterogeneous associations. This study aimed to examine whether the severity of problematic screen use, conceptualized as a continuous measure of screen-related functional impairment, plays a more central role in development than self-reported screen time or phone-checking frequency, and to explore its influence within the broader adolescent ecosystem (i.e. family conflict, peer involvement, and school participation).

Methods: Cohort data were obtained from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study Release 5.1. Screen use was obtained from self-report questionnaires, capturing both activity time and functional impairments. Among cross-sectional networks derived from 9,054 youth (4,272 girls, 47.18%) at 2-year follow-up (T2, ages 11-12 years) and 4,007 youth (1,896 girls, 47.32%) at 4-year follow-up (T4, ages 13-14 years), problematic use showed higher centrality than screen time and checking behavior, owing to stronger connections with behavioral tendencies. Cross-lagged-panel-network analyses of problematic use included 3,954 youth (1,863 girls, 47.12%).

Results: Problematic use exhibited high out-strength, which was associated with worsening psychopathologies and environmental conditions. Conversely, problematic use at T4 appeared less influenced by factors at T2.

Conclusion: This study underscores the pivotal role of problematic screen use, which showed greater centrality and stronger predictive effects on adolescent well-being than self-reported screen time, highlighting the need for policies and interventions addressing screen-related functional impairments to promote healthier screen habits in developing youth.

屏幕时间之外:屏幕使用问题对青少年发展网络的核心影响。
背景和目的:随着数字技术的迅猛发展,人们对青少年使用屏幕的担忧日益加剧。之前的研究往往依赖于自我报告的屏幕时间,而忽略了不同屏幕活动(如社交媒体、游戏和智能手机)的体验和动机方面,这可能导致异质性关联。本研究旨在检验屏幕使用问题的严重程度是否比自我报告的屏幕时间或手机检查频率在发展中起着更重要的作用,并探讨其在更广泛的青少年生态系统中的影响(即家庭冲突、同伴参与和学校参与)。方法:队列数据来自青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究5.1版。屏幕使用情况从自我报告问卷中获得,记录活动时间和功能损伤。在随访2年(T2, 11-12岁)的9054名青少年(4272名女孩,47.18%)和随访4年(T4, 13-14岁)的4007名青少年(1896名女孩,47.32%)的横断面网络中,问题使用比屏幕时间和检查行为表现出更高的中心性,因为问题使用与行为倾向的联系更强。交叉滞后面板-网络分析包括3,954名青少年(1,863名女孩,47.12%)。结果:问题性使用表现出高外向强度,与精神病理和环境条件恶化有关。相反,T4期的问题用药受T2期因素的影响较小。结论:本研究强调了屏幕使用问题的关键作用,与自我报告的屏幕使用时间相比,屏幕使用问题对青少年的幸福感具有更大的中心作用和更强的预测作用,强调了解决屏幕相关功能障碍的政策和干预措施的必要性,以促进发展中青少年更健康的屏幕习惯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Journal of Behavioral Addictions is to create a forum for the scientific information exchange with regard to behavioral addictions. The journal is a broad focused interdisciplinary one that publishes manuscripts on different approaches of non-substance addictions, research reports focusing on the addictive patterns of various behaviors, especially disorders of the impulsive-compulsive spectrum, and also publishes reviews in these topics. Coverage ranges from genetic and neurobiological research through psychological and clinical psychiatric approaches to epidemiological, sociological and anthropological aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信