Disparities in Opioid Agonist Treatment Accessibility for Priority Populations in New South Wales, Australia

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
James H. Conigrave, Timothy Dobbins, Nicholas A. Buckley, K. S. Kylie Lee, Kirsten C. Morley, Michael Doyle, Basma Al-Ansari, Scott Wilson, Summer Loggins, Katherine Conigrave
{"title":"Disparities in Opioid Agonist Treatment Accessibility for Priority Populations in New South Wales, Australia","authors":"James H. Conigrave,&nbsp;Timothy Dobbins,&nbsp;Nicholas A. Buckley,&nbsp;K. S. Kylie Lee,&nbsp;Kirsten C. Morley,&nbsp;Michael Doyle,&nbsp;Basma Al-Ansari,&nbsp;Scott Wilson,&nbsp;Summer Loggins,&nbsp;Katherine Conigrave","doi":"10.1111/dar.14069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is effective for managing opioid dependence; however, it can be hard to access in some regions. We investigated OAT access for priority populations living in New South Wales, Australia: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) peoples, and youth (18–24 years).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Using a linked database, we analysed distances between residential postcodes and OAT dosing points for 29,935 individuals from July 2015 to June 2020. We used multi-level models with random intercepts for clients to assess the relative distance lived from dosing points for members of each priority population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The median distance to dosing points was 9.80 km. Multi-level regression predicting log-transformed distance (ln) showed, relative to others, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander clients lived 89.98% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82.25%, 98.04%) further, and youth lived 15.09% (95% CI 4.70%, 26.52%) further from dosing points. In contrast, CALD individuals lived 35.32% (95% CI 31.88%, 38.58%) closer than others. Multi-level logistic regression showed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander clients were 3.39 (95% CI 2.82, 4.07) times more likely to live 50 km or more from their chosen dosing point.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians and youth have poorer access to OAT dosing points than others in New South Wales. CALD individuals live closer to dosing points, which could suggest better access, or reticence to travel far for care. Targeted interventions are needed to improve OAT accessibility in regional and remote areas.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"44 4","pages":"975-982"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.14069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.14069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is effective for managing opioid dependence; however, it can be hard to access in some regions. We investigated OAT access for priority populations living in New South Wales, Australia: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) peoples, and youth (18–24 years).

Method

Using a linked database, we analysed distances between residential postcodes and OAT dosing points for 29,935 individuals from July 2015 to June 2020. We used multi-level models with random intercepts for clients to assess the relative distance lived from dosing points for members of each priority population.

Results

The median distance to dosing points was 9.80 km. Multi-level regression predicting log-transformed distance (ln) showed, relative to others, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander clients lived 89.98% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82.25%, 98.04%) further, and youth lived 15.09% (95% CI 4.70%, 26.52%) further from dosing points. In contrast, CALD individuals lived 35.32% (95% CI 31.88%, 38.58%) closer than others. Multi-level logistic regression showed Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander clients were 3.39 (95% CI 2.82, 4.07) times more likely to live 50 km or more from their chosen dosing point.

Discussion and Conclusion

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians and youth have poorer access to OAT dosing points than others in New South Wales. CALD individuals live closer to dosing points, which could suggest better access, or reticence to travel far for care. Targeted interventions are needed to improve OAT accessibility in regional and remote areas.

Abstract Image

澳大利亚新南威尔士州优先人群阿片类激动剂治疗可及性的差异。
简介:阿片受体激动剂治疗(OAT)是有效的管理阿片依赖;然而,在某些地区可能很难进入。我们调查了生活在澳大利亚新南威尔士州的优先人群:土著和托雷斯海峡岛民、文化和语言多样性(CALD)人群和青年(18-24岁)的OAT获取情况。方法:使用链接数据库,我们分析了2015年7月至2020年6月29,935人的住宅邮政编码与OAT给药点之间的距离。我们使用具有随机截距的多级模型来评估每个优先人群成员与给药点的相对生活距离。结果:到给药点的中位距离为9.80 km。多水平回归预测对数转换距离(ln)显示,相对于其他人,原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民患者的生活距离比其他人远89.98%(95%可信区间[CI] 82.25%, 98.04%),年轻人的生活距离比其他人远15.09%(95%可信区间[CI] 4.70%, 26.52%)。相比之下,CALD个体的生活距离比其他人近35.32% (95% CI 31.88%, 38.58%)。多层级逻辑回归显示,原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民住在离他们选择的给药点50公里或更远的地方的可能性是前者的3.39倍(95% CI 2.82, 4.07)。讨论和结论:澳大利亚土著和托雷斯海峡岛民和青年比新南威尔士州的其他人更难获得OAT给药点。CALD患者住得离给药点更近,这可能意味着更容易获得治疗,或者不愿长途跋涉。需要有针对性的干预措施来改善区域和偏远地区OAT的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信