Does precision grip research extend to unconstrained, multidigit grasping?

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-12 DOI:10.1152/jn.00008.2025
Fabrizio Lepori, Frieder T Hartmann, Kira I Dehn, Manuela Chessa, Roland W Fleming, Guido Maiello
{"title":"Does precision grip research extend to unconstrained, multidigit grasping?","authors":"Fabrizio Lepori, Frieder T Hartmann, Kira I Dehn, Manuela Chessa, Roland W Fleming, Guido Maiello","doi":"10.1152/jn.00008.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most daily tasks require using our hands. Whether taking a sip from a glass or throwing a ball, we effortlessly select appropriate grasps. Yet, despite many possible hand configurations, most grasping research has focused on the finger-and-thumb \"precision grip.\" We thus questioned whether findings on precision grip-such as sensitivity to object mass and material configuration-hold under unconstrained grasping conditions. To test this, we compared how participants grasped three-dimensional (3-D) objects made of brass and wood, with both precision grip and unconstrained grasps. When unconstrained, participants rarely selected precision grips, favoring multidigit grasps. Nevertheless, in both conditions, participants shifted their grasps toward the objects' center of mass and, when grasp factors conflicted, the variability in their selections increased, indicating greater uncertainty about the optimal strategy. Furthermore, despite favoring multidigit grasps, participants consistently placed the thumb and index finger on the same positions on the objects, suggesting that in multidigit grasps, the additional fingers primarily provided support. Our findings thus reveal that object material affects unconstrained grasping similarly to precision grip and imply that previous precision grip research may extend to unconstrained, multidigit conditions.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Most grasping research focuses on two-digit \"precision grips,\" yet humans have more than two fingers. Here, we test whether previous precision grip findings apply to unconstrained grasping. We find that participants often use more than two digits when free to choose but consistently place their thumb and index finger similarly on objects regardless of the number of fingers used. Our results thus highlight how the large body of precision grip literature can extend to multidigit grasping.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"1836-1843"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00008.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most daily tasks require using our hands. Whether taking a sip from a glass or throwing a ball, we effortlessly select appropriate grasps. Yet, despite many possible hand configurations, most grasping research has focused on the finger-and-thumb "precision grip." We thus questioned whether findings on precision grip-such as sensitivity to object mass and material configuration-hold under unconstrained grasping conditions. To test this, we compared how participants grasped three-dimensional (3-D) objects made of brass and wood, with both precision grip and unconstrained grasps. When unconstrained, participants rarely selected precision grips, favoring multidigit grasps. Nevertheless, in both conditions, participants shifted their grasps toward the objects' center of mass and, when grasp factors conflicted, the variability in their selections increased, indicating greater uncertainty about the optimal strategy. Furthermore, despite favoring multidigit grasps, participants consistently placed the thumb and index finger on the same positions on the objects, suggesting that in multidigit grasps, the additional fingers primarily provided support. Our findings thus reveal that object material affects unconstrained grasping similarly to precision grip and imply that previous precision grip research may extend to unconstrained, multidigit conditions.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Most grasping research focuses on two-digit "precision grips," yet humans have more than two fingers. Here, we test whether previous precision grip findings apply to unconstrained grasping. We find that participants often use more than two digits when free to choose but consistently place their thumb and index finger similarly on objects regardless of the number of fingers used. Our results thus highlight how the large body of precision grip literature can extend to multidigit grasping.

精确握持研究是否延伸到无约束、多指握持?
大多数日常工作都需要用手。无论是从杯子里喝一口还是扔一个球,我们毫不费力地选择合适的握法。然而,尽管有许多可能的手部结构,大多数抓取研究都集中在手指和拇指的“精确抓取”上。因此,我们质疑在无约束的抓取条件下,对精确抓取(如对物体质量和材料结构的敏感性)的发现是否有效。为了验证这一点,我们比较了参与者如何抓住由黄铜和木材制成的3D物体,包括精确抓握和无约束抓握。在不受约束的情况下,参与者很少选择精确握法,而倾向于多位数握法。然而,在这两种情况下,参与者都将抓握转向物体的质心,当抓握因素发生冲突时,他们选择的可变性增加了,这表明最优策略的不确定性更大。此外,尽管喜欢多指抓取,但参与者始终将拇指和食指放在物体上的相同位置,这表明在多指抓取中,额外的手指主要提供支持。因此,我们的研究结果表明,物体材料对无约束抓取的影响与精确抓取的影响相似,并暗示先前的精确抓取研究可以扩展到无约束的多位数条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信