The Status of Presenteeism Among Clinical Nurses in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Evaluation & the Health Professions Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-12 DOI:10.1177/01632787251329968
Xiang Zeng, Kun Wang, Ya Le Guo, Zhao Lan Wang, Jun Wen Li
{"title":"The Status of Presenteeism Among Clinical Nurses in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Xiang Zeng, Kun Wang, Ya Le Guo, Zhao Lan Wang, Jun Wen Li","doi":"10.1177/01632787251329968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the evolution of healthcare, the demand for medical services is rising. Nurses, facing high workloads and job indispensability, are at risk of presenteeism due to health issues, which impairs their focus and productivity. Nursing is a high-risk, high-stress profession, and compared to other medical personnel, nurses are more susceptible to presenteeism. Presenteeism can have severe consequences for nursing staff, the quality of care, and healthcare institutions. Although previous studies have explored the prevalence of presenteeism among nurses, there are variations in reported data due to differences in regions and assessment tools, and there is a scarcity of meta-analyses specifically addressing the prevalence of presenteeism among Chinese nurses. The study systematically assesses the incidence rate of presenteeism among nurses and evaluates the impact of various factors, including gender, marital status, department, professional title, position, education level, and employment relationship, on the incidence rate of presenteeism. Systematic review and meta-analysis. The following databases were searched: China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP Database, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. The search covered all literature published before June 15, 2024. Researchers independently conducted all literature screening, quality assessment, and data extraction and analysis. The average scores and standard deviations of the Chinese version of the Health and Productivity Loss (SPS-6) scale were pooled using Stata 14.0 with a random-effects meta-analysis. Finally, subgroup analysis was employed to explore the sources of heterogeneity between studies. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a total of 26 studies were included, involving 12,366 clinical nurses from China. Our findings indicate that the overall average score for absenteeism was 16.48 (95% CI: 15.64-17.32). Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed that female nurses, married nurses, those with the title of nurse practitioner, clinical nurses, those with a secondary vocational education, contract nurses, and nurses from the ICU had higher presenteeism scores. The level of presenteeism among clinical nurses in China is moderate. Female nurses, married nurses, those with the title of nurse practitioner, clinical nurses, nurses with a secondary vocational education, contract nurses, and those from the ICU exhibit more pronounced presenteeism. These findings may provide a theoretical basis for hospital managers to address and manage presenteeism. PROSPERO number: CRD42024557555.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"20-31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787251329968","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the evolution of healthcare, the demand for medical services is rising. Nurses, facing high workloads and job indispensability, are at risk of presenteeism due to health issues, which impairs their focus and productivity. Nursing is a high-risk, high-stress profession, and compared to other medical personnel, nurses are more susceptible to presenteeism. Presenteeism can have severe consequences for nursing staff, the quality of care, and healthcare institutions. Although previous studies have explored the prevalence of presenteeism among nurses, there are variations in reported data due to differences in regions and assessment tools, and there is a scarcity of meta-analyses specifically addressing the prevalence of presenteeism among Chinese nurses. The study systematically assesses the incidence rate of presenteeism among nurses and evaluates the impact of various factors, including gender, marital status, department, professional title, position, education level, and employment relationship, on the incidence rate of presenteeism. Systematic review and meta-analysis. The following databases were searched: China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP Database, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. The search covered all literature published before June 15, 2024. Researchers independently conducted all literature screening, quality assessment, and data extraction and analysis. The average scores and standard deviations of the Chinese version of the Health and Productivity Loss (SPS-6) scale were pooled using Stata 14.0 with a random-effects meta-analysis. Finally, subgroup analysis was employed to explore the sources of heterogeneity between studies. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a total of 26 studies were included, involving 12,366 clinical nurses from China. Our findings indicate that the overall average score for absenteeism was 16.48 (95% CI: 15.64-17.32). Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed that female nurses, married nurses, those with the title of nurse practitioner, clinical nurses, those with a secondary vocational education, contract nurses, and nurses from the ICU had higher presenteeism scores. The level of presenteeism among clinical nurses in China is moderate. Female nurses, married nurses, those with the title of nurse practitioner, clinical nurses, nurses with a secondary vocational education, contract nurses, and those from the ICU exhibit more pronounced presenteeism. These findings may provide a theoretical basis for hospital managers to address and manage presenteeism. PROSPERO number: CRD42024557555.

中国临床护士出勤状况:系统回顾与meta分析。
背景:随着医疗保健的发展,人们对医疗服务的需求不断上升。面对高工作量和工作不可或缺性的护士,由于健康问题而面临出勤的风险,这会损害他们的注意力和生产力。护理是一个高风险、高压力的职业,与其他医务人员相比,护士更容易出勤。出勤会对护理人员、护理质量和医疗机构造成严重后果。虽然以前的研究已经探讨了护士出勤的普遍程度,但由于地区和评估工具的差异,报告的数据存在差异,并且缺乏专门针对中国护士出勤的普遍程度的元分析。目的:系统评估护士出勤发生率,评价性别、婚姻状况、科室、职称、职务、文化程度、雇佣关系等因素对出勤发生率的影响。设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析。数据来源:检索数据库:中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库、维普数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO。该搜索涵盖了2024年6月15日之前发表的所有文献。综述方法:所有文献筛选、质量评估、资料提取和分析均由研究者独立进行。中文版健康与生产力损失量表(SPS-6)的平均得分和标准差采用Stata 14.0合并随机效应荟萃分析。最后,采用亚组分析探讨研究间异质性的来源。结果:本系统综述和荟萃分析共纳入26项研究,涉及12366名中国临床护士。我们的研究结果表明,旷工的总体平均得分为16.48分(95% CI: 15.64-17.32)。此外,亚组分析显示,女性护士、已婚护士、执业护士、临床护士、中等职业教育程度护士、合同制护士和ICU护士出勤得分较高。结论:中国临床护士出勤率处于中等水平。女护士、已婚护士、执业护士、临床护士、中等职业教育护士、合同制护士和ICU护士出勤率较高。这些发现可以为医院管理者解决和管理出勤问题提供理论依据。报名:普洛斯彼罗号码:CRD42024557555。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evaluation & the Health Professions is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that provides health-related professionals with state-of-the-art methodological, measurement, and statistical tools for conceptualizing the etiology of health promotion and problems, and developing, implementing, and evaluating health programs, teaching and training services, and products that pertain to a myriad of health dimensions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 31 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书