Detection of whey protein concentrate adulteration using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy combined with machine learning.

IF 2.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Meiling Zhu, Weiran Song, Xuan Tang, Xiangzeng Kong
{"title":"Detection of whey protein concentrate adulteration using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy combined with machine learning.","authors":"Meiling Zhu, Weiran Song, Xuan Tang, Xiangzeng Kong","doi":"10.1080/19440049.2025.2494199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, food fraud issues related to whey protein supplements have disrupted the market and caused significant concern among consumers. Conventional analytical methods such as HPLC and ion exchange chromatography are commonly used to detect adulteration in whey protein supplements. However, these methods are costly, time-consuming and require specialised operation, making them less suitable for a wider range of users. This study presents a rapid and reliable approach for verifying the authenticity of whey protein supplements using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) and machine learning. Specifically, this approach is employed to identify 15 brands of whey protein concentration (WPC), quantify protein and carbohydrate concentrations, distinguish three types of adulterants, and predict the level of adulteration. The relationship between LIBS data and analyte labels is established using machine learning methods, including partial least squares regression (PLSR), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and kernel extreme learning machine (K-ELM). The accuracy for identifying WPC brands was over 0.977, and the highest coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>) for quantifying protein and carbohydrate contents was 0.984 and 0.978, respectively. In addition, different adulterants can be differentiated with accuracies exceeding 0.986, and the <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values for adulteration prediction are above 0.967 in most cases. These results suggest that LIBS combined with machine learning can serve as a viable and efficient solution for detecting adulteration in whey protein supplements.</p>","PeriodicalId":12295,"journal":{"name":"Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment","volume":"42 5","pages":"570-579"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Additives and Contaminants Part A-chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2025.2494199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, food fraud issues related to whey protein supplements have disrupted the market and caused significant concern among consumers. Conventional analytical methods such as HPLC and ion exchange chromatography are commonly used to detect adulteration in whey protein supplements. However, these methods are costly, time-consuming and require specialised operation, making them less suitable for a wider range of users. This study presents a rapid and reliable approach for verifying the authenticity of whey protein supplements using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) and machine learning. Specifically, this approach is employed to identify 15 brands of whey protein concentration (WPC), quantify protein and carbohydrate concentrations, distinguish three types of adulterants, and predict the level of adulteration. The relationship between LIBS data and analyte labels is established using machine learning methods, including partial least squares regression (PLSR), partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and kernel extreme learning machine (K-ELM). The accuracy for identifying WPC brands was over 0.977, and the highest coefficient of determination (R2) for quantifying protein and carbohydrate contents was 0.984 and 0.978, respectively. In addition, different adulterants can be differentiated with accuracies exceeding 0.986, and the R2 values for adulteration prediction are above 0.967 in most cases. These results suggest that LIBS combined with machine learning can serve as a viable and efficient solution for detecting adulteration in whey protein supplements.

激光诱导击穿光谱结合机器学习检测乳清蛋白浓缩物掺假。
近年来,与乳清蛋白补充剂有关的食品欺诈问题扰乱了市场,引起了消费者的极大关注。传统的分析方法,如高效液相色谱法和离子交换色谱法通常用于检测掺假乳清蛋白补充剂。然而,这些方法成本高,耗时长,需要专门的操作,使得它们不适合更广泛的用户。本研究提出了一种快速可靠的方法,利用激光诱导击穿光谱(LIBS)和机器学习来验证乳清蛋白补充剂的真实性。具体而言,该方法用于识别15个品牌的乳清蛋白浓度(WPC),量化蛋白质和碳水化合物浓度,区分三种类型的掺假,并预测掺假水平。利用机器学习方法建立LIBS数据与分析物标签之间的关系,包括偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)、偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA)和核极限学习机(K-ELM)。鉴定WPC品牌的准确度在0.977以上,测定蛋白质和碳水化合物含量的最高决定系数(R2)分别为0.984和0.978。此外,不同掺假物的鉴别准确度均在0.986以上,多数情况下掺假预测的R2值均在0.967以上。这些结果表明,LIBS与机器学习相结合可以作为检测乳清蛋白补充剂中掺假的可行且有效的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
136
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A publishes original research papers and critical reviews covering analytical methodology, occurrence, persistence, safety evaluation, detoxification and regulatory control of natural and man-made additives and contaminants in the food and animal feed chain. Papers are published in the areas of food additives including flavourings, pesticide and veterinary drug residues, environmental contaminants, plant toxins, mycotoxins, marine biotoxins, trace elements, migration from food packaging, food process contaminants, adulteration, authenticity and allergenicity of foods. Papers are published on animal feed where residues and contaminants can give rise to food safety concerns. Contributions cover chemistry, biochemistry and bioavailability of these substances, factors affecting levels during production, processing, packaging and storage; the development of novel foods and processes; exposure and risk assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信