Neuropsychological Assessment in Orienteers: Implications for Sports Performance and Cognitive Health.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Perceptual and Motor Skills Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-13 DOI:10.1177/00315125251338644
Rodrigo Hohl, Rodrigo Machado de Oliveira, Sávio Soares Gonçalves, Paula Mauad Kaheler Sá, Nádia Shigaeff
{"title":"Neuropsychological Assessment in Orienteers: Implications for Sports Performance and Cognitive Health.","authors":"Rodrigo Hohl, Rodrigo Machado de Oliveira, Sávio Soares Gonçalves, Paula Mauad Kaheler Sá, Nádia Shigaeff","doi":"10.1177/00315125251338644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orienteering integrates physical (i.e., running) and cognitive (i.e., navigation) demands, making it a dual-task activity with potential neuroplasticity benefits for cognition. Standard neuropsychological assessment may inform athletes and coaches about the cognitive functions to be targeted in brain exercise training for high-performance competition. Moreover, orienteering may improve brain function in those with cognitive impairment in specific domains. This study aimed to identify the predominant cognitive functioning developed in experienced orienteers to inform cognitive training and rehabilitation. Memory, attention, and executive functions (EF) were assessed using a battery of seven neuropsychological tests. The orienteer's neuropsychological profiles (<i>N</i> = 20) were compared with road runners (<i>N</i> = 20) matched for regular physical training to distinguish the cognitive skills developed through dual-task orienteering practice. Cognitive performances were also compared to normative samples using Z-score (CI 95%) analysis. Orienteers demonstrated above-normative levels in four EF tests (mean Z between 0.5-0.7; 0.2-1.2 CI 95%), sustained attention (mean Z: 0.6; 0.2-0.9 CI 95%), and recognition memory (mean Z: 1.09; 0.7-1.5 CI 95%). This approach shows that the above-norm cognitive skills of orienteers may still be improved for high-performance competition. Orienteers outperformed road runners in visual fluency and spatial working memory (Five-Point test (t (2.039), <i>p</i> =.049, <i>d</i> = 0.6) and Corsi Block test (forward [t (2.842), <i>p</i>= (0.046), <i>d</i> = 0.9] and backward [t (2.066), <i>p</i> = .007, <i>d</i> = 0.7]). These findings suggest that orienteering develops specific EF brain networks in healthy individuals which promises to be an efficient practice for cognitive training or rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"1188-1213"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251338644","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Orienteering integrates physical (i.e., running) and cognitive (i.e., navigation) demands, making it a dual-task activity with potential neuroplasticity benefits for cognition. Standard neuropsychological assessment may inform athletes and coaches about the cognitive functions to be targeted in brain exercise training for high-performance competition. Moreover, orienteering may improve brain function in those with cognitive impairment in specific domains. This study aimed to identify the predominant cognitive functioning developed in experienced orienteers to inform cognitive training and rehabilitation. Memory, attention, and executive functions (EF) were assessed using a battery of seven neuropsychological tests. The orienteer's neuropsychological profiles (N = 20) were compared with road runners (N = 20) matched for regular physical training to distinguish the cognitive skills developed through dual-task orienteering practice. Cognitive performances were also compared to normative samples using Z-score (CI 95%) analysis. Orienteers demonstrated above-normative levels in four EF tests (mean Z between 0.5-0.7; 0.2-1.2 CI 95%), sustained attention (mean Z: 0.6; 0.2-0.9 CI 95%), and recognition memory (mean Z: 1.09; 0.7-1.5 CI 95%). This approach shows that the above-norm cognitive skills of orienteers may still be improved for high-performance competition. Orienteers outperformed road runners in visual fluency and spatial working memory (Five-Point test (t (2.039), p =.049, d = 0.6) and Corsi Block test (forward [t (2.842), p= (0.046), d = 0.9] and backward [t (2.066), p = .007, d = 0.7]). These findings suggest that orienteering develops specific EF brain networks in healthy individuals which promises to be an efficient practice for cognitive training or rehabilitation.

定向运动员的神经心理评估:对运动表现和认知健康的影响。
定向运动整合了身体(如跑步)和认知(如导航)需求,使其成为一项双重任务活动,具有潜在的认知神经可塑性益处。标准的神经心理学评估可以告知运动员和教练员在高水平比赛的大脑运动训练中应该针对的认知功能。此外,定向运动可以改善特定领域认知障碍患者的大脑功能。本研究旨在确定经验丰富的定向运动员发展的主要认知功能,为认知训练和康复提供信息。记忆力、注意力和执行功能(EF)通过7个神经心理学测试来评估。将定向运动员(N = 20)的神经心理特征与常规体能训练匹配的路跑者(N = 20)进行比较,以区分双任务定向训练培养的认知技能。认知表现也使用Z-score (CI 95%)分析与规范样本进行比较。定向运动员在四项EF测试中均高于规范水平(平均Z值在0.5-0.7之间;0.2-1.2 CI 95%),持续注意(平均Z: 0.6;0.2-0.9 CI 95%),识别记忆(平均Z: 1.09;0.7-1.5 ci 95%)。这一方法表明,定向运动员的超常认知技能仍有可能在高水平比赛中得到提高。定向运动员在视觉流畅性和空间工作记忆方面优于公路运动员(五点检验(t (2.039), p =;Corsi Block检验(前向[t (2.842), p= (0.046), d = 0.9]和后向[t (2.066), p= .007, d = 0.7])。这些发现表明,定向运动在健康个体中发展了特定的EF脑网络,这有望成为一种有效的认知训练或康复实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信