The language of alcohol: Similarities and differences in how drinkers and policymakers frame alcohol consumption

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Emma Moreton, Emma Davies, James Morris, Richard Cooke
{"title":"The language of alcohol: Similarities and differences in how drinkers and policymakers frame alcohol consumption","authors":"Emma Moreton,&nbsp;Emma Davies,&nbsp;James Morris,&nbsp;Richard Cooke","doi":"10.1111/dar.14056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The primary objective of the paper was to compare semantic domains reported by drinkers and policymakers in their alcohol consumption narratives. The research question was ‘How do drinkers and policymakers use semantic domains to construct alcohol consumption narratives?’.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Secondary analysis of open-ended survey responses (The Drinker Corpus: TDC) and three English alcohol policies (The Policy Corpus: TPC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Wmatrix software was used to identify semantic domains that appeared more frequently in our corpora compared to general usage. Wmatrix outputs a log-likelihood (LL) score; a score of 6.63 corresponds to a <i>p</i> value of 0.05, indicating frequently used domains.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Five domains appeared more frequently in both corpora than general usage: ‘Cause &amp; Effect/Connection’; ‘Disease’; ‘Drinks and Alcohol’; ‘Excessive drinking’; ‘Knowledge’ (LL &gt;226.68 for all). Domains were represented differently in the two corpora; the TPC focused on long-term health consequences, like liver disease, whereas the TDC talked about short-term consequences like hangovers. The ‘Emotional actions’ domain appeared in the TDC more than expected (LL = 231.26). Drinkers reported experiencing positive and negative emotions following drinking. The ‘Social actions/states/processes’ domain was used more frequently in the TPC than expected (LL = 408.17). Policymakers talked about changing ‘behaviour’ in partnership with organisations rather than working with drinkers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study shows that while drinker and policymaker alcohol consumption narratives draw on the same semantic domains, how these domains are used to construct these narratives differs. To improve the effectiveness of policy initiatives, we recommend greater dialogue between policymakers and drinkers.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"44 4","pages":"1194-1206"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.14056","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.14056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The primary objective of the paper was to compare semantic domains reported by drinkers and policymakers in their alcohol consumption narratives. The research question was ‘How do drinkers and policymakers use semantic domains to construct alcohol consumption narratives?’.

Design

Secondary analysis of open-ended survey responses (The Drinker Corpus: TDC) and three English alcohol policies (The Policy Corpus: TPC).

Methods

Wmatrix software was used to identify semantic domains that appeared more frequently in our corpora compared to general usage. Wmatrix outputs a log-likelihood (LL) score; a score of 6.63 corresponds to a p value of 0.05, indicating frequently used domains.

Results

Five domains appeared more frequently in both corpora than general usage: ‘Cause & Effect/Connection’; ‘Disease’; ‘Drinks and Alcohol’; ‘Excessive drinking’; ‘Knowledge’ (LL >226.68 for all). Domains were represented differently in the two corpora; the TPC focused on long-term health consequences, like liver disease, whereas the TDC talked about short-term consequences like hangovers. The ‘Emotional actions’ domain appeared in the TDC more than expected (LL = 231.26). Drinkers reported experiencing positive and negative emotions following drinking. The ‘Social actions/states/processes’ domain was used more frequently in the TPC than expected (LL = 408.17). Policymakers talked about changing ‘behaviour’ in partnership with organisations rather than working with drinkers.

Discussion and Conclusions

This study shows that while drinker and policymaker alcohol consumption narratives draw on the same semantic domains, how these domains are used to construct these narratives differs. To improve the effectiveness of policy initiatives, we recommend greater dialogue between policymakers and drinkers.

酒精的语言:饮酒者和政策制定者如何定义酒精消费的异同。
引言:本文的主要目的是比较饮酒者和政策制定者在他们的酒精消费叙述中报告的语义域。研究的问题是“饮酒者和政策制定者如何使用语义域来构建酒精消费叙事?”设计:对开放式调查反馈(饮酒者语料库:TDC)和三个英国酒精政策(政策语料库:TPC)进行二次分析。方法:采用Wmatrix软件对语料库中出现频率较高的语义域进行识别。Wmatrix输出一个对数似然(LL)分数;得分为6.63,p值为0.05,表示使用频率较高的域。结果:五个领域在两种语料库中出现的频率都高于一般用法:“Cause & Effect/Connection”;“疾病”;“饮料和酒精”;“过度饮酒”;“知识”(所有人都知道)。两个语料库中的域表示不同;TPC关注的是长期健康后果,比如肝病,而TDC关注的是短期后果,比如宿醉。“情绪行为”域出现在TDC中多于预期(LL = 231.26)。饮酒者报告说,他们在饮酒后经历了积极和消极的情绪。“社会行动/状态/过程”领域在TPC中的使用频率高于预期(LL = 408.17)。政策制定者们谈到了与组织合作改变“行为”,而不是与饮酒者合作。讨论与结论:本研究表明,尽管饮酒者和政策制定者的饮酒叙事采用了相同的语义域,但这些语义域如何用于构建这些叙事却有所不同。为了提高政策举措的有效性,我们建议政策制定者和饮酒者之间进行更多的对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信