Clinicians' Perspectives on Cannabis Use and Cannabis Treatment in Clients Undertaking Opioid Dependence Treatment

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Laila Parvaresh, Llewellyn Mills, Jaleh Gholami, Louisa Jansen, Nazila Jamshidi, Kate Baker, Christopher Tremonti, Marguerite Tracy, Adrian Dunlop, Nicholas Lintzeris
{"title":"Clinicians' Perspectives on Cannabis Use and Cannabis Treatment in Clients Undertaking Opioid Dependence Treatment","authors":"Laila Parvaresh,&nbsp;Llewellyn Mills,&nbsp;Jaleh Gholami,&nbsp;Louisa Jansen,&nbsp;Nazila Jamshidi,&nbsp;Kate Baker,&nbsp;Christopher Tremonti,&nbsp;Marguerite Tracy,&nbsp;Adrian Dunlop,&nbsp;Nicholas Lintzeris","doi":"10.1111/dar.14074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>There are no prior studies investigating the perspectives of Opioid Treatment Program (OTP) clinicians on clients' cannabis use. This study examines the perspectives of OTP clinicians on patterns of cannabis use; harms and benefits; current and potential interventions and their confidence in implementing them.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Clinicians from six public OTP services in New South Wales completed the survey. Participants included nurses, doctors, pharmacists, allied health and consumer workers. Single-level regression models were used to estimate participants' sex, role and experience effect.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 162 participants responded to the survey (estimated response rate 56%). Participants estimated 56.1% (±23.9) of OTP clients had used cannabis in the past month, and 44.9% (±6.5) had cannabis dependence. Clinicians indicated (15.3% ± 17.2%) clients identified problematic cannabis use and (10.7% ± 16.9) sought treatment in the past year. The harms most frequently identified by staff were cannabis dependence (46.5% ± 27.9%), financial issues (37.5% ± 29.2%) and increased tobacco use (33.1% ± 28.2%). The benefits most frequently identified were management of sleep problems (49.7% ± 27.8%), chronic pain symptoms (35.6% ± 24.3%) and improvements in mental health (48.3% ± 25.6%). Sixty-five participants (63.7%) advocated for enhancing efforts to address cannabis use, with none supporting scaling down services. Clinicians prioritised withdrawal services (81%), harm reduction (77.4%), counselling (74%) and medicinal cannabis (59.8%), although the majority had low confidence in delivering most of these interventions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Despite awareness about cannabis use patterns and identification of both harms and benefits, clinicians identified low rates of cannabis interventions and low levels of confidence in delivering interventions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"44 5","pages":"1339-1350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.14074","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.14074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

There are no prior studies investigating the perspectives of Opioid Treatment Program (OTP) clinicians on clients' cannabis use. This study examines the perspectives of OTP clinicians on patterns of cannabis use; harms and benefits; current and potential interventions and their confidence in implementing them.

Methods

Clinicians from six public OTP services in New South Wales completed the survey. Participants included nurses, doctors, pharmacists, allied health and consumer workers. Single-level regression models were used to estimate participants' sex, role and experience effect.

Results

A total of 162 participants responded to the survey (estimated response rate 56%). Participants estimated 56.1% (±23.9) of OTP clients had used cannabis in the past month, and 44.9% (±6.5) had cannabis dependence. Clinicians indicated (15.3% ± 17.2%) clients identified problematic cannabis use and (10.7% ± 16.9) sought treatment in the past year. The harms most frequently identified by staff were cannabis dependence (46.5% ± 27.9%), financial issues (37.5% ± 29.2%) and increased tobacco use (33.1% ± 28.2%). The benefits most frequently identified were management of sleep problems (49.7% ± 27.8%), chronic pain symptoms (35.6% ± 24.3%) and improvements in mental health (48.3% ± 25.6%). Sixty-five participants (63.7%) advocated for enhancing efforts to address cannabis use, with none supporting scaling down services. Clinicians prioritised withdrawal services (81%), harm reduction (77.4%), counselling (74%) and medicinal cannabis (59.8%), although the majority had low confidence in delivering most of these interventions.

Discussion and Conclusions

Despite awareness about cannabis use patterns and identification of both harms and benefits, clinicians identified low rates of cannabis interventions and low levels of confidence in delivering interventions.

临床医生对阿片类药物依赖患者大麻使用和大麻治疗的看法
导论:之前没有研究调查阿片类药物治疗计划(OTP)临床医生对客户大麻使用的看法。本研究考察了OTP临床医生对大麻使用模式的看法;危害与利益;当前和潜在的干预措施及其实施的信心。方法:来自新南威尔士州六家公共OTP服务机构的临床医生完成调查。参加者包括护士、医生、药剂师、专职保健工作者和消费者工作者。采用单水平回归模型估计被试的性别、角色和经验效应。结果:共有162名参与者回应了调查(估计回复率为56%)。参与者估计56.1%(±23.9%)的OTP客户在过去一个月使用过大麻,44.9%(±6.5)有大麻依赖。临床医生指出(15.3%±17.2%)的客户发现有问题的大麻使用,(10.7%±16.9%)的客户在过去一年中寻求治疗。工作人员最常发现的危害是大麻依赖(46.5%±27.9%)、财务问题(37.5%±29.2%)和烟草使用增加(33.1%±28.2%)。最常见的益处是睡眠问题(49.7%±27.8%)、慢性疼痛症状(35.6%±24.3%)和心理健康改善(48.3%±25.6%)。65名参与者(63.7%)主张加强努力解决大麻使用问题,没有人支持缩小服务规模。临床医生优先考虑戒断服务(81%)、减少危害(77.4%)、咨询(74%)和药用大麻(59.8%),尽管大多数人对提供这些干预措施的信心较低。讨论和结论:尽管对大麻使用模式有所了解,并确定了危害和益处,但临床医生发现,大麻干预率很低,对提供干预措施的信心也很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信