Racial Differences in Naturalistic Psychedelic Use - Motivations for Use, Communication with Health Care Providers, and Outcomes.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Nicolas G Glynos, Mallet R Reid, Jacob S Aday, Daniel J Kruger, Kevin F Boehnke, Stephanie Lake, Philippe Lucas
{"title":"Racial Differences in Naturalistic Psychedelic Use - Motivations for Use, Communication with Health Care Providers, and Outcomes.","authors":"Nicolas G Glynos, Mallet R Reid, Jacob S Aday, Daniel J Kruger, Kevin F Boehnke, Stephanie Lake, Philippe Lucas","doi":"10.1080/02791072.2025.2491381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>People of Color have been under-included in psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) research. Researchers have argued that systemic issues resulting in harms to communities of color like the War on Drugs and recurrent exposure to discrimination in healthcare settings may reduce their willingness to engage in PAT research. However, there are no empirical data regarding People of Color's trust or willingness in using psychedelics with support of trained healthcare providers. Therefore, we analyzed data from a large-scale survey of people using psychedelics to explore interactions between People of Color and healthcare providers in North America. The sample included 3,547 White people, 448 People of Color, and 377 Multiracial people. A lower proportion of People of Color consumed psychedelics with the support of a trained provider but an equal proportion had disclosed psychedelic use to primary care providers. Further, People of Color were equally motivated to use psychedelics with a trained healthcare provider, used psychedelics to treat similar issues, and similarly reported psychedelics as effective with other groups. Our findings suggest that lack of trust may not fully explain the underrepresentation of People of Color in PAT research, and future studies should investigate other barriers to People of Color's inclusion in PAT research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2025.2491381","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People of Color have been under-included in psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) research. Researchers have argued that systemic issues resulting in harms to communities of color like the War on Drugs and recurrent exposure to discrimination in healthcare settings may reduce their willingness to engage in PAT research. However, there are no empirical data regarding People of Color's trust or willingness in using psychedelics with support of trained healthcare providers. Therefore, we analyzed data from a large-scale survey of people using psychedelics to explore interactions between People of Color and healthcare providers in North America. The sample included 3,547 White people, 448 People of Color, and 377 Multiracial people. A lower proportion of People of Color consumed psychedelics with the support of a trained provider but an equal proportion had disclosed psychedelic use to primary care providers. Further, People of Color were equally motivated to use psychedelics with a trained healthcare provider, used psychedelics to treat similar issues, and similarly reported psychedelics as effective with other groups. Our findings suggest that lack of trust may not fully explain the underrepresentation of People of Color in PAT research, and future studies should investigate other barriers to People of Color's inclusion in PAT research.

自然致幻剂使用的种族差异——使用动机、与卫生保健提供者的沟通和结果。
有色人种在迷幻药辅助治疗(PAT)研究中被低估了。研究人员认为,对有色人种社区造成伤害的系统性问题,如反毒品战争,以及在医疗机构中反复受到歧视,可能会降低他们参与PAT研究的意愿。然而,没有关于有色人种在训练有素的医疗保健提供者的支持下使用致幻剂的信任或意愿的经验数据。因此,我们分析了来自一项大规模调查的数据,调查使用致幻剂的人,以探索北美有色人种与医疗保健提供者之间的相互作用。样本包括3547名白人、448名有色人种和377名多种族人士。有色人种在训练有素的提供者的支持下使用迷幻药的比例较低,但同样比例的人向初级保健提供者披露了迷幻药的使用情况。此外,有色人种同样有动力在训练有素的医疗保健提供者那里使用致幻剂,使用致幻剂治疗类似的问题,并且类似地报告致幻剂对其他群体有效。我们的研究结果表明,缺乏信任可能不能完全解释有色人种在PAT研究中的代表性不足,未来的研究应该调查有色人种在PAT研究中的其他障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信