Transdiagnostic and Disorder-Level GWAS Enhance Precision of Substance Use and Psychiatric Genetic Risk Profiles in African and European Ancestries.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Yousef Khan, Christal N Davis, Zeal Jinwala, Kyra L Feuer, Sylvanus Toikumo, Emily E Hartwell, Sandra Sanchez-Roige, Roseann E Peterson, Alexander S Hatoum, Henry R Kranzler, Rachel L Kember
{"title":"Transdiagnostic and Disorder-Level GWAS Enhance Precision of Substance Use and Psychiatric Genetic Risk Profiles in African and European Ancestries.","authors":"Yousef Khan, Christal N Davis, Zeal Jinwala, Kyra L Feuer, Sylvanus Toikumo, Emily E Hartwell, Sandra Sanchez-Roige, Roseann E Peterson, Alexander S Hatoum, Henry R Kranzler, Rachel L Kember","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.04.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Substance use disorders (SUDs) and psychiatric disorders frequently co-occur, and their etiology likely reflects both transdiagnostic (i.e., common/shared) and disorder-level (i.e., independent/nonshared) genetic influences. Understanding the genetic influences that are shared and those that operate independently of the shared risk could enhance precision in diagnosis, prevention, and treatment, but this remains underexplored, particularly in non-European ancestry groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied genomic structural equation modeling to examine the common and independent genetic architecture among SUDs and psychotic, mood, and anxiety disorders using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted in European- (EUR) and African-ancestry (AFR) individuals. To characterize the biological and phenotypic associations, we used FUMA, conducted genetic correlations, and performed phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In EUR individuals, transdiagnostic genetic factors represented SUDs, psychotic, and mood/anxiety disorders, with GWAS identifying two novel lead single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for the mood factor. In AFR individuals, genetic factors represented SUDs and psychiatric disorders, and GWAS identified one novel lead SNP for the SUD factor. In EUR individuals, second-order factor models showed phenotypic and genotypic associations with a broad range of physical and mental health traits. Finally, genetic correlations and PheWAS highlighted how common and independent genetic factors for SUD and psychotic disorders were differentially associated with psychiatric, sociodemographic, and medical phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining transdiagnostic and disorder-level genetic approaches can improve our understanding of co-occurring conditions and increase the specificity of genetic discovery, which is critical for identifying more effective prevention and treatment strategies to reduce the burden of these disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":8918,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.04.021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Substance use disorders (SUDs) and psychiatric disorders frequently co-occur, and their etiology likely reflects both transdiagnostic (i.e., common/shared) and disorder-level (i.e., independent/nonshared) genetic influences. Understanding the genetic influences that are shared and those that operate independently of the shared risk could enhance precision in diagnosis, prevention, and treatment, but this remains underexplored, particularly in non-European ancestry groups.

Methods: We applied genomic structural equation modeling to examine the common and independent genetic architecture among SUDs and psychotic, mood, and anxiety disorders using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted in European- (EUR) and African-ancestry (AFR) individuals. To characterize the biological and phenotypic associations, we used FUMA, conducted genetic correlations, and performed phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS).

Results: In EUR individuals, transdiagnostic genetic factors represented SUDs, psychotic, and mood/anxiety disorders, with GWAS identifying two novel lead single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for the mood factor. In AFR individuals, genetic factors represented SUDs and psychiatric disorders, and GWAS identified one novel lead SNP for the SUD factor. In EUR individuals, second-order factor models showed phenotypic and genotypic associations with a broad range of physical and mental health traits. Finally, genetic correlations and PheWAS highlighted how common and independent genetic factors for SUD and psychotic disorders were differentially associated with psychiatric, sociodemographic, and medical phenotypes.

Conclusions: Combining transdiagnostic and disorder-level genetic approaches can improve our understanding of co-occurring conditions and increase the specificity of genetic discovery, which is critical for identifying more effective prevention and treatment strategies to reduce the burden of these disorders.

跨诊断和紊乱水平的GWAS提高了非洲和欧洲祖先物质使用和精神遗传风险概况的准确性。
背景:物质使用障碍(sud)和精神障碍经常同时发生,其病因可能反映了跨诊断(即共同/共有)和疾病水平(即独立/非共有)的遗传影响。了解共同的遗传影响和那些独立于共同风险的遗传影响可以提高诊断、预防和治疗的准确性,但这一点仍未得到充分探索,特别是在非欧洲血统群体中。方法:我们应用基因组结构方程模型,利用欧洲(EUR)和非洲血统(AFR)个体全基因组关联研究(GWAS)的汇总统计数据,研究sud与精神病、情绪和焦虑症之间的共同和独立遗传结构。为了描述生物学和表型相关性,我们使用了fua,进行了遗传相关性,并进行了全现象相关性研究(PheWAS)。结果:在EUR个体中,跨诊断遗传因素代表了sud、精神病和情绪/焦虑障碍,GWAS鉴定了两个新的情绪因素单核苷酸多态性(snp)。在AFR个体中,遗传因素代表SUD和精神疾病,GWAS发现了SUD因素的一个新的先导SNP。在EUR个体中,二阶因子模型显示表型和基因型与广泛的身心健康特征相关。最后,遗传相关性和PheWAS强调了SUD和精神障碍的常见和独立遗传因素与精神、社会人口统计学和医学表型之间的差异。结论:结合跨诊断和疾病水平的遗传方法可以提高我们对共同发生疾病的理解,增加遗传发现的特异性,这对于确定更有效的预防和治疗策略以减轻这些疾病的负担至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Psychiatry
Biological Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
18.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
1398
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Biological Psychiatry is an official journal of the Society of Biological Psychiatry and was established in 1969. It is the first journal in the Biological Psychiatry family, which also includes Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging and Biological Psychiatry: Global Open Science. The Society's main goal is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in the fields related to the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders pertaining to thought, emotion, and behavior. To fulfill this mission, Biological Psychiatry publishes peer-reviewed, rapid-publication articles that present new findings from original basic, translational, and clinical mechanistic research, ultimately advancing our understanding of psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal also encourages the submission of reviews and commentaries on current research and topics of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信