Differentiating pure cognitive disengagement syndrome and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-restrictive inattentive presentation with respect to depressive symptoms, autistic traits, and neurocognitive profiles.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sibel Durak, Akın Tahıllıoğlu, Çisel Yazan Songür, Mert Çoban, Buğra Varol, Eyüp Sabri Ercan
{"title":"Differentiating pure cognitive disengagement syndrome and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-restrictive inattentive presentation with respect to depressive symptoms, autistic traits, and neurocognitive profiles.","authors":"Sibel Durak, Akın Tahıllıoğlu, Çisel Yazan Songür, Mert Çoban, Buğra Varol, Eyüp Sabri Ercan","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2025.2493812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to differentiate \"pure\" cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS) from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-restrictive inattentive presentation (ADHD-RI) by examining their neurocognitive profiles and associations with autistic traits (ATs) and depressive symptoms. A cross-sectional study was conducted involving three groups: pure CDS (<i>n</i> = 24), ADHD-RI (<i>n</i> = 32), and controls (<i>n</i> = 31). Participants underwent neuropsychological assessments using Computerized Neurocognitive Assessment Software (CNS) Vital Signs, alongside evaluations for ATs with the Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire, depressive symptoms with the Children's Depression Inventory, and CDS symptoms with the Barkley Child Attention Scale. A semi-structured interview was also conducted with all participants and their parents to ensure the diagnostic validity of the groups. Findings indicated no dimensional symptomatological distinctions between CDS and ADHD-RI, except for CDS symptoms, and demonstrated no significant differences in neurocognitive test profiles between CDS and ADHD-RI, except for the neurocognition index and reaction time. ATs and depressive symptoms did not significantly differ between the pure CDS and ADHD-RI groups but were significantly elevated in both groups compared to controls. The ADHD-RI group exhibited significantly worse performance than CDS concerning the neurocognition index and reaction time, and worse than controls regarding the neurocognition index, reaction time, psychomotor speed, and complex attention. This study elucidates that ADHD-RI and \"pure\" CDS have substantially overlapping neurocognitive and phenotypic profiles despite certain minor differences, which is detrimental to subjects with ADHD-RI in terms of overall neurocognition and reaction time. It can be argued that, compared to \"pure\" CDS, executive dysfunction might be slightly more specific to ADHD-RI, while depressive symptoms and ATs are common in both psychological constructs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2025.2493812","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to differentiate "pure" cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS) from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder-restrictive inattentive presentation (ADHD-RI) by examining their neurocognitive profiles and associations with autistic traits (ATs) and depressive symptoms. A cross-sectional study was conducted involving three groups: pure CDS (n = 24), ADHD-RI (n = 32), and controls (n = 31). Participants underwent neuropsychological assessments using Computerized Neurocognitive Assessment Software (CNS) Vital Signs, alongside evaluations for ATs with the Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire, depressive symptoms with the Children's Depression Inventory, and CDS symptoms with the Barkley Child Attention Scale. A semi-structured interview was also conducted with all participants and their parents to ensure the diagnostic validity of the groups. Findings indicated no dimensional symptomatological distinctions between CDS and ADHD-RI, except for CDS symptoms, and demonstrated no significant differences in neurocognitive test profiles between CDS and ADHD-RI, except for the neurocognition index and reaction time. ATs and depressive symptoms did not significantly differ between the pure CDS and ADHD-RI groups but were significantly elevated in both groups compared to controls. The ADHD-RI group exhibited significantly worse performance than CDS concerning the neurocognition index and reaction time, and worse than controls regarding the neurocognition index, reaction time, psychomotor speed, and complex attention. This study elucidates that ADHD-RI and "pure" CDS have substantially overlapping neurocognitive and phenotypic profiles despite certain minor differences, which is detrimental to subjects with ADHD-RI in terms of overall neurocognition and reaction time. It can be argued that, compared to "pure" CDS, executive dysfunction might be slightly more specific to ADHD-RI, while depressive symptoms and ATs are common in both psychological constructs.

区分纯粹的认知脱离综合征和注意缺陷/多动障碍-限制性注意力不集中表现与抑郁症状、自闭症特征和神经认知特征有关。
本研究旨在通过检查“纯粹的”认知脱离综合征(CDS)与注意缺陷/多动障碍-限制性注意力不集中表现(ADHD-RI)的神经认知特征及其与自闭症特征(ATs)和抑郁症状的关联,来区分它们。横断面研究涉及三组:纯CDS (n = 24), ADHD-RI (n = 32)和对照组(n = 31)。参与者使用计算机化神经认知评估软件(CNS)生命体征进行神经心理学评估,同时使用自闭症谱系筛查问卷评估ATs,使用儿童抑郁量表评估抑郁症状,使用Barkley儿童注意力量表评估CDS症状。对所有参与者及其父母进行了半结构化访谈,以确保小组诊断的有效性。研究结果表明,除了CDS症状外,CDS和ADHD-RI之间没有维度上的症状差异,并且除了神经认知指数和反应时间外,CDS和ADHD-RI之间的神经认知测试谱没有显著差异。ATs和抑郁症状在纯CDS组和ADHD-RI组之间没有显著差异,但与对照组相比,两组的ATs和抑郁症状均显著升高。ADHD-RI组在神经认知指数和反应时间方面的表现明显低于对照组,在神经认知指数、反应时间、精神运动速度和复杂注意方面的表现明显低于对照组。本研究表明,ADHD-RI和“纯”CDS在神经认知和表型特征上存在很大的重叠,尽管存在一些细微的差异,这在整体神经认知和反应时间方面对ADHD-RI受试者不利。可以认为,与“纯粹的”CDS相比,执行功能障碍可能对ADHD-RI更有特异性,而抑郁症状和ATs在这两种心理结构中都很常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Applied Neuropsychology: Child CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信