Understanding barriers and optimizing socio-cognitive assessment in the diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders.

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Chiara Cerami, Marina Boccardi, Claudia Meli, Andrea Panzavolta, Giulia Funghi, Cristina Festari, Stefano F Cappa, Thanos Chatzikostopoulos, Christian Chicherio, Florencia Clarens, Fabricio Ferreira de Oliveira, Francesco Di Lorenzo, Marco Filardi, Agustin Ibanez, Nicola Girtler, Thibaud Lebouvier, Giancarlo Logroscino, Antonella Luca, Sarah E MacPherson, Jordi A Matias-Guiu, Tommaso Piccoli, Olivier Piguet, Simone Pomati, Mirella Russo, Leonardo Sacco, Ann-Katrin Schild, Stefano L Sensi, Steven D Shirk, Marc Sollberger, Miguel Tábuas-Pereira, Magda Tsolaki, Esther van den Berg, Maxime Bertoux, Fiona Kumfor, Jan Van den Stock, Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer, Alessandra Dodich
{"title":"Understanding barriers and optimizing socio-cognitive assessment in the diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders.","authors":"Chiara Cerami, Marina Boccardi, Claudia Meli, Andrea Panzavolta, Giulia Funghi, Cristina Festari, Stefano F Cappa, Thanos Chatzikostopoulos, Christian Chicherio, Florencia Clarens, Fabricio Ferreira de Oliveira, Francesco Di Lorenzo, Marco Filardi, Agustin Ibanez, Nicola Girtler, Thibaud Lebouvier, Giancarlo Logroscino, Antonella Luca, Sarah E MacPherson, Jordi A Matias-Guiu, Tommaso Piccoli, Olivier Piguet, Simone Pomati, Mirella Russo, Leonardo Sacco, Ann-Katrin Schild, Stefano L Sensi, Steven D Shirk, Marc Sollberger, Miguel Tábuas-Pereira, Magda Tsolaki, Esther van den Berg, Maxime Bertoux, Fiona Kumfor, Jan Van den Stock, Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer, Alessandra Dodich","doi":"10.1111/jnp.12431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Harmonized neuropsychological assessment for neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) is an urgent priority in clinics. Neuropsychology assessments in NCDs seldom include tests exploring social cognitive skills. In 2022, we launched the SIGNATURE initiative to optimize socio-cognitive assessment in NCDs. Here, we report findings from the first initiative phase, including consortium creation and evaluation of the state of the art in socio-cognitive assessment in memory clinics. We developed an ad hoc online survey to explore practices and measures, relevance, and obstacles preventing the use of socio-cognitive testing in clinics. The survey was distributed within the SIGNATURE network. National coordinators were identified to disseminate the survey to local collaborators and scientific societies active in the field of dementia and/or neuropsychology. Data were analysed in aggregate form and stratified by geographical area and variables of interest. Four hundred and thirteen (413) responses from 10 European and Latin American geographical regions were recorded. Responders were balanced between physicians and psychologists. Seventy-eight (78) % of respondents reported no/limited experience with socio-cognitive measures; more than 85% agreed on their relevance in clinics. Ekman-60 faces was the most well-known and/or used task, followed by the Faux-Pas and Reading-the-Mind-in-the-Eyes tests. Lack of clinical measures, assessment time, guidelines, and education/training were reported as main obstacles. Real-life barriers prevent the adoption of socio-cognitive testing in clinics. Bidirectional collaboration between clinicians and researchers is required to address clinical needs and constraints and facilitate consistent socio-cognitive assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12431","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Harmonized neuropsychological assessment for neurocognitive disorders (NCDs) is an urgent priority in clinics. Neuropsychology assessments in NCDs seldom include tests exploring social cognitive skills. In 2022, we launched the SIGNATURE initiative to optimize socio-cognitive assessment in NCDs. Here, we report findings from the first initiative phase, including consortium creation and evaluation of the state of the art in socio-cognitive assessment in memory clinics. We developed an ad hoc online survey to explore practices and measures, relevance, and obstacles preventing the use of socio-cognitive testing in clinics. The survey was distributed within the SIGNATURE network. National coordinators were identified to disseminate the survey to local collaborators and scientific societies active in the field of dementia and/or neuropsychology. Data were analysed in aggregate form and stratified by geographical area and variables of interest. Four hundred and thirteen (413) responses from 10 European and Latin American geographical regions were recorded. Responders were balanced between physicians and psychologists. Seventy-eight (78) % of respondents reported no/limited experience with socio-cognitive measures; more than 85% agreed on their relevance in clinics. Ekman-60 faces was the most well-known and/or used task, followed by the Faux-Pas and Reading-the-Mind-in-the-Eyes tests. Lack of clinical measures, assessment time, guidelines, and education/training were reported as main obstacles. Real-life barriers prevent the adoption of socio-cognitive testing in clinics. Bidirectional collaboration between clinicians and researchers is required to address clinical needs and constraints and facilitate consistent socio-cognitive assessment.

了解障碍和优化社会认知评估在神经认知障碍的诊断。
神经认知障碍(ncd)的统一神经心理学评估是临床的当务之急。非传染性疾病的神经心理学评估很少包括探索社会认知技能的测试。2022年,我们启动了SIGNATURE倡议,以优化非传染性疾病的社会认知评估。在这里,我们报告了第一倡议阶段的发现,包括联盟的创建和对记忆诊所社会认知评估的最新状态的评估。我们开发了一项特别的在线调查,以探索临床使用社会认知测试的实践和措施、相关性和障碍。该调查在SIGNATURE网络内分发。确定了国家协调员,将调查传播给活跃在痴呆症和/或神经心理学领域的当地合作者和科学协会。数据以汇总形式进行分析,并按地理区域和感兴趣的变量分层。来自10个欧洲和拉丁美洲地理区域的413份回复被记录下来。回应者在医生和心理学家之间保持平衡。百分之七十八(78%)的受访者报告没有或有限的社会认知测量经验;超过85%的人同意它们在诊所中的重要性。Ekman-60面孔测试是最著名和/或最常用的测试,其次是失礼测试和读心测试。据报道,缺乏临床措施、评估时间、指南和教育/培训是主要障碍。现实生活中的障碍阻碍了诊所采用社会认知测试。需要临床医生和研究人员之间的双向合作来解决临床需求和限制,并促进一致的社会认知评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuropsychology
Journal of Neuropsychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuropsychology publishes original contributions to scientific knowledge in neuropsychology including: • clinical and research studies with neurological, psychiatric and psychological patient populations in all age groups • behavioural or pharmacological treatment regimes • cognitive experimentation and neuroimaging • multidisciplinary approach embracing areas such as developmental psychology, neurology, psychiatry, physiology, endocrinology, pharmacology and imaging science The following types of paper are invited: • papers reporting original empirical investigations • theoretical papers; provided that these are sufficiently related to empirical data • review articles, which need not be exhaustive, but which should give an interpretation of the state of research in a given field and, where appropriate, identify its clinical implications • brief reports and comments • case reports • fast-track papers (included in the issue following acceptation) reaction and rebuttals (short reactions to publications in JNP followed by an invited rebuttal of the original authors) • special issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信