Physical Fitness and Physical Activity in Adolescent Childhood Cancer Survivors and Controls: The PACCS Study.

Elisabeth Edvardsen,Ellen Ruud,Corina Silvia Rueegg,Haakon Kristian Kvidaland,Ingrid Kristin Torsvik,Lars Peder Vatshelle Bovim,May Grydeland,Nicolas von der Weid,Sigmund Alfred Anderssen,Susi Kriemler,Truls Raastad
{"title":"Physical Fitness and Physical Activity in Adolescent Childhood Cancer Survivors and Controls: The PACCS Study.","authors":"Elisabeth Edvardsen,Ellen Ruud,Corina Silvia Rueegg,Haakon Kristian Kvidaland,Ingrid Kristin Torsvik,Lars Peder Vatshelle Bovim,May Grydeland,Nicolas von der Weid,Sigmund Alfred Anderssen,Susi Kriemler,Truls Raastad","doi":"10.1249/mss.0000000000003758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\r\nTo compare physical fitness, function and physical activity (PA) in adolescent childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) to age- and sex-matched controls and across different cancer diagnoses.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis multicenter cross-sectional study (PACCS) included CCSs aged 9-18 years (≥1-year after cancer treatment) and age- and sex-matched controls. Physical fitness tests included cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max) and muscular strength (maximal isometric handgrip, knee-extension, and chest-press). Physical function tests included a 1-min sit-to-stand test (STS) and countermovement jump (CMJ). PA was measured by accelerometer for seven days. We used linear mixed effects models to compare outcomes between CCSs and controls, and across diagnostic groups.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nWe included 157 CCSs and 113 controls, aged 13.4 ± 2.6 years (mean ± SD). Cancer types were leukemia (n = 78), central nervous system (CNS) tumors (n = 18), lymphoma (n = 16), and other solid tumors (n = 45). CCSs had lower VO2max (marginal mean [95% confidence interval]) 41.7 [38.4-45.0] vs 46.4 [42.9-49.8] mL·kg-1·min-1, P < 0.001), knee-extension strength (35.4 [34.1-36.8] vs 38.2 [36.7-39.7] kg, P = 0.003), chest-press strength (30.0 [28.4-31.6] vs 32.8 [31.0-34.7] kg, P = 0.007), STS repetitions (57.5 [55.8-59.3] vs 60.0 [58.0-62.0] P = 0.017), and CMJ height (22.1, [20.5-23.8] vs 24.9 [23.2-26.6] cm, P < 0.001). PA levels and sedentary time were similar in both groups (8513 [7993-9034] vs 9000 [8404-9596] steps per day, P = 0.174, respectively). Survivors of CNS tumors had the lowest values for VO2max, muscular strength, physical function and PA.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nDespite no significant difference in PA levels, adolescent CCSs had 4.2% to 11% lower physical fitness and function compared to controls, where survivors of CNS tumors performed poorest.","PeriodicalId":18500,"journal":{"name":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To compare physical fitness, function and physical activity (PA) in adolescent childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) to age- and sex-matched controls and across different cancer diagnoses. METHODS This multicenter cross-sectional study (PACCS) included CCSs aged 9-18 years (≥1-year after cancer treatment) and age- and sex-matched controls. Physical fitness tests included cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2max) and muscular strength (maximal isometric handgrip, knee-extension, and chest-press). Physical function tests included a 1-min sit-to-stand test (STS) and countermovement jump (CMJ). PA was measured by accelerometer for seven days. We used linear mixed effects models to compare outcomes between CCSs and controls, and across diagnostic groups. RESULTS We included 157 CCSs and 113 controls, aged 13.4 ± 2.6 years (mean ± SD). Cancer types were leukemia (n = 78), central nervous system (CNS) tumors (n = 18), lymphoma (n = 16), and other solid tumors (n = 45). CCSs had lower VO2max (marginal mean [95% confidence interval]) 41.7 [38.4-45.0] vs 46.4 [42.9-49.8] mL·kg-1·min-1, P < 0.001), knee-extension strength (35.4 [34.1-36.8] vs 38.2 [36.7-39.7] kg, P = 0.003), chest-press strength (30.0 [28.4-31.6] vs 32.8 [31.0-34.7] kg, P = 0.007), STS repetitions (57.5 [55.8-59.3] vs 60.0 [58.0-62.0] P = 0.017), and CMJ height (22.1, [20.5-23.8] vs 24.9 [23.2-26.6] cm, P < 0.001). PA levels and sedentary time were similar in both groups (8513 [7993-9034] vs 9000 [8404-9596] steps per day, P = 0.174, respectively). Survivors of CNS tumors had the lowest values for VO2max, muscular strength, physical function and PA. CONCLUSIONS Despite no significant difference in PA levels, adolescent CCSs had 4.2% to 11% lower physical fitness and function compared to controls, where survivors of CNS tumors performed poorest.
青少年儿童癌症幸存者和对照组的身体健康和身体活动:PACCS研究。
目的比较青少年儿童癌症幸存者(CCSs)与年龄和性别匹配的对照组以及不同癌症诊断的身体健康、功能和身体活动(PA)。方法本多中心横断面研究(PACCS)纳入年龄9-18岁(癌症治疗后≥1年)的CCSs和年龄和性别匹配的对照组。体能测试包括心肺功能(最大摄氧量)和肌肉力量(最大等距握力、膝关节伸展和胸部按压)。身体功能测试包括1分钟坐立测试(STS)和反动作跳跃(CMJ)。用加速度计测量PA,持续7天。我们使用线性混合效应模型来比较CCSs和对照组之间以及诊断组之间的结果。结果纳入157例CCSs和113例对照组,年龄13.4±2.6岁(平均±SD)。癌症类型为白血病(n = 78)、中枢神经系统肿瘤(n = 18)、淋巴瘤(n = 16)和其他实体肿瘤(n = 45)。CCSs的最大摄气量(边际平均值[95%可信区间])较低(41.7 [38.4-45.0]vs 46.4 [42.9-49.8] mL·kg-1·min-1, P < 0.001),膝关节伸展力量(35.4 [34.1-36.8]vs 38.2 [36.7-39.7] kg, P = 0.003),胸压力量(30.0 [28.4-31.6]vs 32.8 [31.0-34.7] kg, P = 0.007), STS重复次数(57.5 [55.8-59.3]vs 60.0 [58.0-62.0] P = 0.017), CMJ高度(22.1,[20.5-23.8]vs 24.9 [23.2-26.6] cm, P < 0.001)。两组的PA水平和久坐时间相似(每天8513[7993-9034]步和9000[8404-9596]步,P = 0.174)。中枢神经系统肿瘤幸存者的VO2max、肌肉力量、身体功能和PA值最低。结论:尽管PA水平无显著差异,青少年CCSs的身体健康和功能比对照组低4.2%至11%,而CNS肿瘤幸存者表现最差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信