Critical Special Education: Navigating Special Education Realities and Working Toward the Ideals of Disability Studies in Education

IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Katherine E. Lewis, Erica N. Mason
{"title":"Critical Special Education: Navigating Special Education Realities and Working Toward the Ideals of Disability Studies in Education","authors":"Katherine E. Lewis, Erica N. Mason","doi":"10.1177/00144029251336213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are two divergent perspectives about how best to understand and serve students with disabilities: Traditional Special Education and Disability Studies in Education. These fields represent distinct epistemological, theoretical, methodological, and pedagogical ways of understanding education for students with disabilities. Researchers, teachers, and teacher educators are faced with navigating these polarized fields while trying to articulate their own professional identity. Unfortunately, neither perspective alone addresses both the practicalities of navigating existing structures, policies, and practices, and the visionary anti-ableist ideals that will meaningfully address inequities for students with disabilities. In this conceptual paper we offer an alternative, a Critical Special Education framework, which represents the continuum between the two fields. We describe the siloing of Traditional Special Education and Disability Studies in Education, identify the need for an alternative, and outline the tenets of Critical Special Education. This framework leverages aspects of the existing special education structures to reduce harm in the here and now, while simultaneously striving toward the ideals of Disability Studies in Education and creating more just and humanizing education for students with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptional Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029251336213","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are two divergent perspectives about how best to understand and serve students with disabilities: Traditional Special Education and Disability Studies in Education. These fields represent distinct epistemological, theoretical, methodological, and pedagogical ways of understanding education for students with disabilities. Researchers, teachers, and teacher educators are faced with navigating these polarized fields while trying to articulate their own professional identity. Unfortunately, neither perspective alone addresses both the practicalities of navigating existing structures, policies, and practices, and the visionary anti-ableist ideals that will meaningfully address inequities for students with disabilities. In this conceptual paper we offer an alternative, a Critical Special Education framework, which represents the continuum between the two fields. We describe the siloing of Traditional Special Education and Disability Studies in Education, identify the need for an alternative, and outline the tenets of Critical Special Education. This framework leverages aspects of the existing special education structures to reduce harm in the here and now, while simultaneously striving toward the ideals of Disability Studies in Education and creating more just and humanizing education for students with disabilities.
批判性特殊教育:引导特殊教育现实,努力实现教育中残疾研究的理想
关于如何最好地理解和服务残疾学生,有两种不同的观点:传统的特殊教育和教育中的残疾研究。这些领域代表了理解残疾学生教育的不同认识论、理论、方法和教学方式。研究人员、教师和教师教育者在试图阐明自己的职业身份的同时,面临着在这些两极分化的领域中导航的问题。不幸的是,这两种观点都不能单独解决现有结构、政策和实践的实际问题,也不能解决有意义地解决残疾学生不平等问题的有远见的反残疾主义理想。在这篇概念性论文中,我们提供了一个替代方案,一个关键的特殊教育框架,它代表了两个领域之间的连续体。我们描述了传统特殊教育和教育中的残疾研究的孤立,确定了替代方案的必要性,并概述了关键特殊教育的原则。该框架利用现有特殊教育结构的各个方面来减少此时此地的伤害,同时努力实现残疾教育研究的理想,为残疾学生创造更公正和人性化的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Exceptional Children, an official journal of The Council for Exceptional Children, publishes original research and analyses that focus on the education and development of exceptional infants, toddlers, children, youth, and adults. This includes descriptions of research, research reviews, methodological reviews of the literature, data-based position papers, policy analyses, and registered reports. Exceptional Children publishes quantitative, qualitative, and single-subject design studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信