{"title":"Ecological validity of retrospective reflections in eye tracking","authors":"Eeva S.H. Haataja , Ilona Södervik","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Teacher professional vision consists of two aspects, noticing and interpretation, and it can be investigated comprehensively by combining eye tracking and teacher reflection. Several studies have acknowledged the importance of authenticity in educational eye tracking research, but have not defined what is meant by this goal. When participant interviews are added into eye-tracking research, ensuring ecological validity becomes even more complex.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This methodological paper investigates how the aim of ecological validity is understood in gaze-simulated retrospective recall research with teacher participants, and how this contributes to the theory of professional vision.</div></div><div><h3>Samples</h3><div>Two research settings investigating Finnish mathematics and higher education teachers are used to investigate methodological and theoretical reflections.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a reflective methodological study. Data from the two research settings was revisited, and conclusions from the studies of both authors were reviewed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The two studies approached the concept of ecological validity from different angles: the ecological validity of cues, and the ecological validity of the research setting. The authentic teaching context enables teacher reflections of their detailed noticing and not-noticing behaviors. Using gaze-stimulated retrospective recall as a part of teacher training adds to the ecological validity though the safety and familiarity between the researchers and participants.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Approaching ecological validity in research combining eye tracking and gaze-stimulated retrospective reflections is complex. It can emerge through different practices depending on the aims of the research and requires careful attention from the researchers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 102147"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475225000714","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Teacher professional vision consists of two aspects, noticing and interpretation, and it can be investigated comprehensively by combining eye tracking and teacher reflection. Several studies have acknowledged the importance of authenticity in educational eye tracking research, but have not defined what is meant by this goal. When participant interviews are added into eye-tracking research, ensuring ecological validity becomes even more complex.
Aims
This methodological paper investigates how the aim of ecological validity is understood in gaze-simulated retrospective recall research with teacher participants, and how this contributes to the theory of professional vision.
Samples
Two research settings investigating Finnish mathematics and higher education teachers are used to investigate methodological and theoretical reflections.
Methods
This is a reflective methodological study. Data from the two research settings was revisited, and conclusions from the studies of both authors were reviewed.
Results
The two studies approached the concept of ecological validity from different angles: the ecological validity of cues, and the ecological validity of the research setting. The authentic teaching context enables teacher reflections of their detailed noticing and not-noticing behaviors. Using gaze-stimulated retrospective recall as a part of teacher training adds to the ecological validity though the safety and familiarity between the researchers and participants.
Conclusions
Approaching ecological validity in research combining eye tracking and gaze-stimulated retrospective reflections is complex. It can emerge through different practices depending on the aims of the research and requires careful attention from the researchers.
期刊介绍:
As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.