Lara H. Engelbert , Michiel van Elk , Jan Theeuwes , Mark van Vugt
{"title":"The influence of charismatic leadership on followers’ attentional processes","authors":"Lara H. Engelbert , Michiel van Elk , Jan Theeuwes , Mark van Vugt","doi":"10.1016/j.leaqua.2024.101854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We examined how followers process consistent versus inconsistent messages from a highly charismatic versus non-charismatic leader on a theme relevant to both leader and follower (i.e., climate change). We conducted a lab eye-tracking experiment (Study 1, <em>N</em> = 32) and an online reading experiment (Study 2, <em>N</em> = 1729) to observe followers’ reactions towards (written) information that they received from a leader with high versus low charisma and that was consistent or inconsistent with the leader’s previously expressed views. In Study 1, we found some evidence that participants spent longer reading consistent and inconsistent messages in the high (vs. low) charisma condition. There was no interaction between the charisma and message inconsistency factors. In Study 2, we observed that exposure to a message from a highly charismatic leader (vs. low charisma) increased reading times across consistent and inconsistent sentences. However, when excluding potentially endogenous variables from the analysis, we found some evidence that charisma moderates the processing of inconsistencies, such that participants spent longer reading inconsistent information in the high versus low charisma condition. We discuss the influence of charismatic signaling on followers’ attentional processes in the context of leadership and cognitive attention theories and provide recommendations for future research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48434,"journal":{"name":"Leadership Quarterly","volume":"36 3","pages":"Article 101854"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984324000833","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We examined how followers process consistent versus inconsistent messages from a highly charismatic versus non-charismatic leader on a theme relevant to both leader and follower (i.e., climate change). We conducted a lab eye-tracking experiment (Study 1, N = 32) and an online reading experiment (Study 2, N = 1729) to observe followers’ reactions towards (written) information that they received from a leader with high versus low charisma and that was consistent or inconsistent with the leader’s previously expressed views. In Study 1, we found some evidence that participants spent longer reading consistent and inconsistent messages in the high (vs. low) charisma condition. There was no interaction between the charisma and message inconsistency factors. In Study 2, we observed that exposure to a message from a highly charismatic leader (vs. low charisma) increased reading times across consistent and inconsistent sentences. However, when excluding potentially endogenous variables from the analysis, we found some evidence that charisma moderates the processing of inconsistencies, such that participants spent longer reading inconsistent information in the high versus low charisma condition. We discuss the influence of charismatic signaling on followers’ attentional processes in the context of leadership and cognitive attention theories and provide recommendations for future research.
期刊介绍:
The Leadership Quarterly is a social-science journal dedicated to advancing our understanding of leadership as a phenomenon, how to study it, as well as its practical implications.
Leadership Quarterly seeks contributions from various disciplinary perspectives, including psychology broadly defined (i.e., industrial-organizational, social, evolutionary, biological, differential), management (i.e., organizational behavior, strategy, organizational theory), political science, sociology, economics (i.e., personnel, behavioral, labor), anthropology, history, and methodology.Equally desirable are contributions from multidisciplinary perspectives.