Perceptions of leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams: Gender, personality, and self- versus peer evaluations

IF 9.1 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Wendy Farrell , Malika Richards , Vasyl Taras , Hafsa El Kamous , Lydia Karnadi , Dhruv Pratap Singh , Marc Idelson
{"title":"Perceptions of leadership effectiveness in global virtual teams: Gender, personality, and self- versus peer evaluations","authors":"Wendy Farrell ,&nbsp;Malika Richards ,&nbsp;Vasyl Taras ,&nbsp;Hafsa El Kamous ,&nbsp;Lydia Karnadi ,&nbsp;Dhruv Pratap Singh ,&nbsp;Marc Idelson","doi":"10.1016/j.leaqua.2024.101859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This two-study paper examines the link between gender and perceived leadership effectiveness in self-organized Global Virtual Teams (GVTs). Perceived leadership effectiveness is assessed through both self and peer evaluations across a combined sample of 2,430 participants (predominantly students with work experience) from 96 countries, organized into 533 GVTs. The findings from both studies indicate that, in global virtual teams (GVTs), women are perceived by their peers as more effective leaders compared to men. Moreover, women show a smaller gap between self and peer evaluations, suggesting greater alignment between their self-assessments and teammate evaluations. Additionally, Big Five personality traits, specifically Conscientiousness and Extraversion, positively influence peer evaluations of perceived leadership effectiveness. Finally, no single espoused national cultural value of the individuals being rated consistently predicted perceived leadership effectiveness across both studies. Although Masculinity and Collectivism were significant in one study and Uncertainty Avoidance in the other, none showed a consistent effect across both studies. These findings provide valuable insights for recruitment and performance management practices and suggest important directions for future research on gender dynamics and leadership in global virtual teams.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48434,"journal":{"name":"Leadership Quarterly","volume":"36 3","pages":"Article 101859"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984324000882","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This two-study paper examines the link between gender and perceived leadership effectiveness in self-organized Global Virtual Teams (GVTs). Perceived leadership effectiveness is assessed through both self and peer evaluations across a combined sample of 2,430 participants (predominantly students with work experience) from 96 countries, organized into 533 GVTs. The findings from both studies indicate that, in global virtual teams (GVTs), women are perceived by their peers as more effective leaders compared to men. Moreover, women show a smaller gap between self and peer evaluations, suggesting greater alignment between their self-assessments and teammate evaluations. Additionally, Big Five personality traits, specifically Conscientiousness and Extraversion, positively influence peer evaluations of perceived leadership effectiveness. Finally, no single espoused national cultural value of the individuals being rated consistently predicted perceived leadership effectiveness across both studies. Although Masculinity and Collectivism were significant in one study and Uncertainty Avoidance in the other, none showed a consistent effect across both studies. These findings provide valuable insights for recruitment and performance management practices and suggest important directions for future research on gender dynamics and leadership in global virtual teams.
全球虚拟团队对领导效能的认知:性别、个性、自我与同伴评价
本文研究了自组织全球虚拟团队(gvt)中性别与感知领导效能之间的联系。感知领导力的有效性是通过自我评估和同行评估来评估的,共有来自96个国家的2430名参与者(主要是有工作经验的学生),被分为533个gvt。这两项研究的结果都表明,在全球虚拟团队(gvt)中,女性被同龄人认为是比男性更有效的领导者。此外,女性在自我评价和同伴评价之间的差距较小,这表明她们的自我评价和队友评价之间存在更大的一致性。此外,五大人格特质,特别是尽责性和外向性,正影响同伴对感知领导有效性的评价。最后,在两项研究中,没有一种被评价的个人所信奉的国家文化价值观能够一致地预测感知到的领导效能。尽管男性气质和集体主义在一项研究和另一项研究中都很重要,但在两项研究中都没有显示出一致的影响。这些发现为招聘和绩效管理实践提供了有价值的见解,并为未来研究全球虚拟团队中的性别动态和领导力提出了重要方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Leadership Quarterly is a social-science journal dedicated to advancing our understanding of leadership as a phenomenon, how to study it, as well as its practical implications. Leadership Quarterly seeks contributions from various disciplinary perspectives, including psychology broadly defined (i.e., industrial-organizational, social, evolutionary, biological, differential), management (i.e., organizational behavior, strategy, organizational theory), political science, sociology, economics (i.e., personnel, behavioral, labor), anthropology, history, and methodology.Equally desirable are contributions from multidisciplinary perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信