Multi-objective optimization of the laser powder-bed fusion process of 17–4 PH stainless steel: Balancing quality and processing rate

IF 4.6 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 OPTICS
Chunfeng Ding , Andrew Kennedy , Yuze Huang
{"title":"Multi-objective optimization of the laser powder-bed fusion process of 17–4 PH stainless steel: Balancing quality and processing rate","authors":"Chunfeng Ding ,&nbsp;Andrew Kennedy ,&nbsp;Yuze Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.optlastec.2025.113073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reducing build time while maintaining fabrication quality is vital to broadening the industrial adoption of laser power-bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing. However, the processing parameters that maximize processing rate often conflict with those optimized for mechanical properties. This study integrated physical and statistical models to establish the relationship between these optimization objectives and the process parameters, and thus utilized a multi-objective optimization (MOO) approach to maximize the localized processing rate while maintaining high part-level quality. The physical model, built based on Eagar-Tsai’s solution, offers time-efficient predictions of the melt pool dimensions and localized processing rates. The statistical model, developed using a multiple-output Gaussian process (MOGP), incorporates the correlation between the part-level objectives based on their experimental measurements. Compared with the other three traditional MOO algorithms in terms of Pareto front solution diversity, root mean square error (RMSE), and run time, we found that: (i) the nonlinear relationships between the part-level objectives, i.e. surface roughness and relative density, could be established using the MOGP; (ii) the MOGP model demonstrated higher prediction accuracy for part-level objectives than both the second-order polynomial (SOP) and standard Gaussian process (GP) models; and (iii) the developed MOO, based on the expected hypervolume improvement (EHI) active learning strategy, proved superior to those established by non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), achieving a 14 % reduction in RMSE while reducing the run time by 25 %.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19511,"journal":{"name":"Optics and Laser Technology","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 113073"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optics and Laser Technology","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030399225006644","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reducing build time while maintaining fabrication quality is vital to broadening the industrial adoption of laser power-bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing. However, the processing parameters that maximize processing rate often conflict with those optimized for mechanical properties. This study integrated physical and statistical models to establish the relationship between these optimization objectives and the process parameters, and thus utilized a multi-objective optimization (MOO) approach to maximize the localized processing rate while maintaining high part-level quality. The physical model, built based on Eagar-Tsai’s solution, offers time-efficient predictions of the melt pool dimensions and localized processing rates. The statistical model, developed using a multiple-output Gaussian process (MOGP), incorporates the correlation between the part-level objectives based on their experimental measurements. Compared with the other three traditional MOO algorithms in terms of Pareto front solution diversity, root mean square error (RMSE), and run time, we found that: (i) the nonlinear relationships between the part-level objectives, i.e. surface roughness and relative density, could be established using the MOGP; (ii) the MOGP model demonstrated higher prediction accuracy for part-level objectives than both the second-order polynomial (SOP) and standard Gaussian process (GP) models; and (iii) the developed MOO, based on the expected hypervolume improvement (EHI) active learning strategy, proved superior to those established by non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), achieving a 14 % reduction in RMSE while reducing the run time by 25 %.
17-4 PH不锈钢激光粉末床熔合工艺的多目标优化:平衡质量与加工率
在保持制造质量的同时减少制造时间对于扩大激光动力床融合(LPBF)增材制造的工业应用至关重要。然而,最大化加工速率的加工参数往往与优化力学性能的加工参数相冲突。本研究结合物理模型和统计模型建立了这些优化目标与工艺参数之间的关系,从而利用多目标优化(MOO)方法在保持高零件质量的同时最大化本地化加工速率。基于Eagar-Tsai的解决方案建立的物理模型提供了对熔池尺寸和局部处理速率的高效预测。利用多输出高斯过程(MOGP)开发的统计模型结合了基于实验测量的部分级目标之间的相关性。从Pareto前解多样性、均方根误差(RMSE)和运行时间等方面与其他三种传统MOO算法进行比较,发现:(1)MOGP可以建立零件级目标(即表面粗糙度和相对密度)之间的非线性关系;(ii) MOGP模型对局部目标的预测精度高于二阶多项式(SOP)和标准高斯过程(GP)模型;(iii)基于预期超体积改进(EHI)主动学习策略开发的MOO优于非主导排序遗传算法II (NSGA-II)建立的MOO, RMSE降低14%,运行时间减少25%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1060
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Optics & Laser Technology aims to provide a vehicle for the publication of a broad range of high quality research and review papers in those fields of scientific and engineering research appertaining to the development and application of the technology of optics and lasers. Papers describing original work in these areas are submitted to rigorous refereeing prior to acceptance for publication. The scope of Optics & Laser Technology encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: •development in all types of lasers •developments in optoelectronic devices and photonics •developments in new photonics and optical concepts •developments in conventional optics, optical instruments and components •techniques of optical metrology, including interferometry and optical fibre sensors •LIDAR and other non-contact optical measurement techniques, including optical methods in heat and fluid flow •applications of lasers to materials processing, optical NDT display (including holography) and optical communication •research and development in the field of laser safety including studies of hazards resulting from the applications of lasers (laser safety, hazards of laser fume) •developments in optical computing and optical information processing •developments in new optical materials •developments in new optical characterization methods and techniques •developments in quantum optics •developments in light assisted micro and nanofabrication methods and techniques •developments in nanophotonics and biophotonics •developments in imaging processing and systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信