{"title":"Multi-objective optimization of the laser powder-bed fusion process of 17–4 PH stainless steel: Balancing quality and processing rate","authors":"Chunfeng Ding , Andrew Kennedy , Yuze Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.optlastec.2025.113073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reducing build time while maintaining fabrication quality is vital to broadening the industrial adoption of laser power-bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing. However, the processing parameters that maximize processing rate often conflict with those optimized for mechanical properties. This study integrated physical and statistical models to establish the relationship between these optimization objectives and the process parameters, and thus utilized a multi-objective optimization (MOO) approach to maximize the localized processing rate while maintaining high part-level quality. The physical model, built based on Eagar-Tsai’s solution, offers time-efficient predictions of the melt pool dimensions and localized processing rates. The statistical model, developed using a multiple-output Gaussian process (MOGP), incorporates the correlation between the part-level objectives based on their experimental measurements. Compared with the other three traditional MOO algorithms in terms of Pareto front solution diversity, root mean square error (RMSE), and run time, we found that: (i) the nonlinear relationships between the part-level objectives, i.e. surface roughness and relative density, could be established using the MOGP; (ii) the MOGP model demonstrated higher prediction accuracy for part-level objectives than both the second-order polynomial (SOP) and standard Gaussian process (GP) models; and (iii) the developed MOO, based on the expected hypervolume improvement (EHI) active learning strategy, proved superior to those established by non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), achieving a 14 % reduction in RMSE while reducing the run time by 25 %.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19511,"journal":{"name":"Optics and Laser Technology","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 113073"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optics and Laser Technology","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030399225006644","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reducing build time while maintaining fabrication quality is vital to broadening the industrial adoption of laser power-bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing. However, the processing parameters that maximize processing rate often conflict with those optimized for mechanical properties. This study integrated physical and statistical models to establish the relationship between these optimization objectives and the process parameters, and thus utilized a multi-objective optimization (MOO) approach to maximize the localized processing rate while maintaining high part-level quality. The physical model, built based on Eagar-Tsai’s solution, offers time-efficient predictions of the melt pool dimensions and localized processing rates. The statistical model, developed using a multiple-output Gaussian process (MOGP), incorporates the correlation between the part-level objectives based on their experimental measurements. Compared with the other three traditional MOO algorithms in terms of Pareto front solution diversity, root mean square error (RMSE), and run time, we found that: (i) the nonlinear relationships between the part-level objectives, i.e. surface roughness and relative density, could be established using the MOGP; (ii) the MOGP model demonstrated higher prediction accuracy for part-level objectives than both the second-order polynomial (SOP) and standard Gaussian process (GP) models; and (iii) the developed MOO, based on the expected hypervolume improvement (EHI) active learning strategy, proved superior to those established by non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), achieving a 14 % reduction in RMSE while reducing the run time by 25 %.
期刊介绍:
Optics & Laser Technology aims to provide a vehicle for the publication of a broad range of high quality research and review papers in those fields of scientific and engineering research appertaining to the development and application of the technology of optics and lasers. Papers describing original work in these areas are submitted to rigorous refereeing prior to acceptance for publication.
The scope of Optics & Laser Technology encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas:
•development in all types of lasers
•developments in optoelectronic devices and photonics
•developments in new photonics and optical concepts
•developments in conventional optics, optical instruments and components
•techniques of optical metrology, including interferometry and optical fibre sensors
•LIDAR and other non-contact optical measurement techniques, including optical methods in heat and fluid flow
•applications of lasers to materials processing, optical NDT display (including holography) and optical communication
•research and development in the field of laser safety including studies of hazards resulting from the applications of lasers (laser safety, hazards of laser fume)
•developments in optical computing and optical information processing
•developments in new optical materials
•developments in new optical characterization methods and techniques
•developments in quantum optics
•developments in light assisted micro and nanofabrication methods and techniques
•developments in nanophotonics and biophotonics
•developments in imaging processing and systems