Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on academic and cognitive skills in individuals with specific learning disabilities: A systematic review
{"title":"Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on academic and cognitive skills in individuals with specific learning disabilities: A systematic review","authors":"Elahe Fathi Azar , Hooshang Mirzaie , Sahar Oftadeh Balani , Mahnaz Hejazi-Shirmard","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.04.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There has been a rising interest in utilizing transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) techniques to induce neuroplasticity and modulate cognition in children and adults. Despite the escalating interest in non-pharmacological interventions in people with specific learning disabilities (SLD), there is a noticeable absence of a thorough and up-to-date review that consolidates studies of TES in individuals with SLD.A systematic literature search, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase databases, covering the period from 2000 to September 2024. Study eligibility criteria were pre-established using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) model. The grade of recommendation (GOR) for each learning disability was determined based on the level of evidence (LOE). Out of 1571 initial references, the screening resulted in inclusion of nineteen studies (17 dyslexia, 2 dyscalculia). The total number of participants in the included studies was 470, of which 249 were female (52.97 %) and 221 were male (47.03 %). The mean age of participants ranged from 9.5 to 33 years. Fifteen studies employed tDCS, one study used tACS and tRNS, and one utilized tRNS exclusively. TES interventions, especially tDCS, enhanced phonological awareness, improved reading accuracy, and reduced reading time in individuals with dyslexia. In those with dyscalculia, TES improved mathematical performance but did not demonstrate significant effects on cognitive skills. Findings suggest TES interventions, particularly tDCS, are beneficial for improving cognitive skills and reading performance in individuals with dyslexia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19142,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience","volume":"576 ","pages":"Pages 241-252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452225003380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There has been a rising interest in utilizing transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) techniques to induce neuroplasticity and modulate cognition in children and adults. Despite the escalating interest in non-pharmacological interventions in people with specific learning disabilities (SLD), there is a noticeable absence of a thorough and up-to-date review that consolidates studies of TES in individuals with SLD.A systematic literature search, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase databases, covering the period from 2000 to September 2024. Study eligibility criteria were pre-established using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) model. The grade of recommendation (GOR) for each learning disability was determined based on the level of evidence (LOE). Out of 1571 initial references, the screening resulted in inclusion of nineteen studies (17 dyslexia, 2 dyscalculia). The total number of participants in the included studies was 470, of which 249 were female (52.97 %) and 221 were male (47.03 %). The mean age of participants ranged from 9.5 to 33 years. Fifteen studies employed tDCS, one study used tACS and tRNS, and one utilized tRNS exclusively. TES interventions, especially tDCS, enhanced phonological awareness, improved reading accuracy, and reduced reading time in individuals with dyslexia. In those with dyscalculia, TES improved mathematical performance but did not demonstrate significant effects on cognitive skills. Findings suggest TES interventions, particularly tDCS, are beneficial for improving cognitive skills and reading performance in individuals with dyslexia.
利用经颅电刺激(TES)技术诱导儿童和成人的神经可塑性和调节认知的兴趣越来越大。尽管对特殊学习障碍(SLD)患者的非药物干预越来越感兴趣,但明显缺乏对SLD患者TES研究的全面和最新的综述。按照PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for systematic Reviews and meta - analysis)指南,对PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、谷歌Scholar和Embase数据库进行了系统文献检索,检索时间为2000年至2024年9月。使用人群、干预、比较和结果(PICO)模型预先建立了研究资格标准。根据证据水平(LOE)确定每种学习障碍的推荐等级(GOR)。在1571个初始参考文献中,筛选结果包括19个研究(17个阅读障碍,2个计算障碍)。纳入研究的总人数为470人,其中女性249人(52.97%),男性221人(47.03%)。参与者的平均年龄从9.5岁到33岁不等。15项研究采用tDCS, 1项研究使用tACS和tRNS, 1项研究仅使用tRNS。TES干预,特别是tDCS,可以增强语音意识,提高阅读准确性,减少阅读障碍患者的阅读时间。对于那些患有计算障碍的人来说,TES改善了他们的数学表现,但对认知能力没有显著的影响。研究结果表明,TES干预,特别是tDCS,有利于提高阅读障碍患者的认知技能和阅读表现。
期刊介绍:
Neuroscience publishes papers describing the results of original research on any aspect of the scientific study of the nervous system. Any paper, however short, will be considered for publication provided that it reports significant, new and carefully confirmed findings with full experimental details.