Cognition as a predictor of social network size and early communication in clinically high risk for psychosis individuals

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Nashya Linares , Danielle N. Pratt , Katherine S.F. Damme , Vijay A. Mittal
{"title":"Cognition as a predictor of social network size and early communication in clinically high risk for psychosis individuals","authors":"Nashya Linares ,&nbsp;Danielle N. Pratt ,&nbsp;Katherine S.F. Damme ,&nbsp;Vijay A. Mittal","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social networks provide critical support, yet individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR) often experience deficits in social functioning and have smaller networks compared to healthy controls (HCs). Cognitive impairment, a hallmark characteristic of this group, may be associated with these challenges. This study is the first investigation into the relationships between general and specific domains of cognition and social network and communication abilities in people at CHR. The sample included 91 participants (HC = 43, CHR = 48) with complete cognitive and social network assessments from the same visit, with additional analyses including guardian ratings of social responsiveness and communication. Cognitive ability was significantly associated with social network size in both groups (b = 0.38, <em>p</em> &lt; .0001), with significant contributions from working memory (b = 0.29, <em>p</em> = .004), speed of processing (b = 0.23, <em>p</em> = 002), verbal learning (b = 0.24, <em>p</em> = .007), and social cognition (b = 0.25, <em>p</em> = .012). Higher scores on cognitive functioning correlated with better social reciprocity (b = 1.28, <em>p</em> = .009) and fewer communication difficulties (b = 0.25, <em>p</em> &lt; .002). Processing speed was particularly relevant to both social responsiveness (b = 0.88, <em>p</em> &lt; .022) and communication difficulties (b = 0.12, <em>p</em> &lt; .03). An interaction effect revealed that associations between cognitive ability on communication skills were more pronounced in CHR individuals compared to HCs (b = 0.26, <em>p</em> &lt; .037). These findings underscore the potential role of specific cognitive domains, such as processing speed, in social functioning among CHR individuals. Future research should examine the directionality of these relationships to better understand underlying mechanisms of social functioning impairments and inform treatment development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100365"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221500132500023X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social networks provide critical support, yet individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR) often experience deficits in social functioning and have smaller networks compared to healthy controls (HCs). Cognitive impairment, a hallmark characteristic of this group, may be associated with these challenges. This study is the first investigation into the relationships between general and specific domains of cognition and social network and communication abilities in people at CHR. The sample included 91 participants (HC = 43, CHR = 48) with complete cognitive and social network assessments from the same visit, with additional analyses including guardian ratings of social responsiveness and communication. Cognitive ability was significantly associated with social network size in both groups (b = 0.38, p < .0001), with significant contributions from working memory (b = 0.29, p = .004), speed of processing (b = 0.23, p = 002), verbal learning (b = 0.24, p = .007), and social cognition (b = 0.25, p = .012). Higher scores on cognitive functioning correlated with better social reciprocity (b = 1.28, p = .009) and fewer communication difficulties (b = 0.25, p < .002). Processing speed was particularly relevant to both social responsiveness (b = 0.88, p < .022) and communication difficulties (b = 0.12, p < .03). An interaction effect revealed that associations between cognitive ability on communication skills were more pronounced in CHR individuals compared to HCs (b = 0.26, p < .037). These findings underscore the potential role of specific cognitive domains, such as processing speed, in social functioning among CHR individuals. Future research should examine the directionality of these relationships to better understand underlying mechanisms of social functioning impairments and inform treatment development.
认知作为精神病临床高危个体社会网络大小和早期沟通的预测因子
社会网络提供了关键的支持,然而临床精神病高危人群(CHR)往往经历社会功能缺陷,与健康对照组(hc)相比,他们的社会网络更小。认知障碍,这一群体的一个标志性特征,可能与这些挑战有关。本研究首次调查了CHR人员的一般认知和特定认知领域与社会网络和沟通能力之间的关系。样本包括91名参与者(HC = 43, CHR = 48),他们在同一次访问中进行了完整的认知和社会网络评估,并进行了额外的分析,包括监护人对社会反应性和沟通的评分。两组的认知能力与社会网络规模显著相关(b = 0.38, p <;.0001),其中工作记忆(b = 0.29, p = 0.004)、加工速度(b = 0.23, p = 002)、言语学习(b = 0.24, p = 0.007)和社会认知(b = 0.25, p = 0.012)的贡献显著。认知功能得分越高,社会互惠性越好(b = 1.28, p = 0.009),沟通困难越少(b = 0.25, p <;.002)。处理速度与社会反应特别相关(b = 0.88, p <;.022)和沟通困难(b = 0.12, p <;03)。交互效应显示,认知能力与沟通技巧之间的关联在高智商人群中更为显著(b = 0.26, p <;.037)。这些发现强调了特定认知领域的潜在作用,如处理速度,在CHR个体的社会功能中。未来的研究应该检查这些关系的方向性,以更好地了解社会功能障碍的潜在机制,并为治疗发展提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信