Functionality assessment of natural gas distribution networks in post-earthquake scenarios with widespread component failures

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Heran Wang, Changhai Zhai, Liyang Ma, Dongdong Song, Lili Xie
{"title":"Functionality assessment of natural gas distribution networks in post-earthquake scenarios with widespread component failures","authors":"Heran Wang,&nbsp;Changhai Zhai,&nbsp;Liyang Ma,&nbsp;Dongdong Song,&nbsp;Lili Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.ress.2025.111134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban natural gas distribution networks are critical infrastructure systems that provide essential energy services to residential, industrial, and commercial sectors. However, these networks are highly vulnerable to earthquake-induced damage, leading to significant functionality loss and risks such as fires and explosions. To evaluate the functional status of natural gas pipeline networks under post-earthquake conditions, it is essential to develop a robust evaluation model capable of addressing large-scale component damage. This study proposes a natural gas pipeline network functionality assessment methodology that integrates islanding analysis to identify interconnected sub-networks, pressure-dependent demand modeling for user nodes, and a dual-control mechanism for gas source nodes to improve the accuracy of hydraulic calculations under accident conditions. Compared to traditional methods, the proposed approach provides a more accurate representation of natural gas pipeline network behavior under partial gas supply conditions. Validation on a representative natural gas pipeline network demonstrates its effectiveness in identifying and quantifying functional losses during extensive component failures. Comparative analysis reveals that traditional methods tend to overestimate network functionality under severe damage conditions, underscoring the advantages of the proposed approach. These findings confirm the methodology’s suitability for evaluating functionality in scenarios of severe disruption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54500,"journal":{"name":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","volume":"262 ","pages":"Article 111134"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reliability Engineering & System Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832025003357","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban natural gas distribution networks are critical infrastructure systems that provide essential energy services to residential, industrial, and commercial sectors. However, these networks are highly vulnerable to earthquake-induced damage, leading to significant functionality loss and risks such as fires and explosions. To evaluate the functional status of natural gas pipeline networks under post-earthquake conditions, it is essential to develop a robust evaluation model capable of addressing large-scale component damage. This study proposes a natural gas pipeline network functionality assessment methodology that integrates islanding analysis to identify interconnected sub-networks, pressure-dependent demand modeling for user nodes, and a dual-control mechanism for gas source nodes to improve the accuracy of hydraulic calculations under accident conditions. Compared to traditional methods, the proposed approach provides a more accurate representation of natural gas pipeline network behavior under partial gas supply conditions. Validation on a representative natural gas pipeline network demonstrates its effectiveness in identifying and quantifying functional losses during extensive component failures. Comparative analysis reveals that traditional methods tend to overestimate network functionality under severe damage conditions, underscoring the advantages of the proposed approach. These findings confirm the methodology’s suitability for evaluating functionality in scenarios of severe disruption.
大范围部件失效的震后天然气配网功能评估
城市天然气分配网络是为住宅、工业和商业部门提供基本能源服务的关键基础设施系统。然而,这些网络非常容易受到地震引起的破坏,导致重大的功能损失和火灾和爆炸等风险。为了评估震后条件下天然气管网的功能状态,必须建立一个能够处理大规模部件损坏的鲁棒评估模型。本研究提出了一种天然气管网功能评估方法,该方法集成了孤岛分析以识别互联子网络,用户节点的压力依赖需求建模以及气源节点的双重控制机制,以提高事故条件下水力计算的准确性。与传统方法相比,该方法能够更准确地表征部分供气条件下的天然气管网行为。在一个具有代表性的天然气管网上的验证表明,该方法在识别和量化大量部件故障时的功能损失方面是有效的。对比分析表明,传统方法在严重损伤条件下往往会高估网络功能,这凸显了本文方法的优势。这些发现证实了该方法在严重中断情况下评估功能的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Reliability Engineering & System Safety 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
39.50%
发文量
621
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Elsevier publishes Reliability Engineering & System Safety in association with the European Safety and Reliability Association and the Safety Engineering and Risk Analysis Division. The international journal is devoted to developing and applying methods to enhance the safety and reliability of complex technological systems, like nuclear power plants, chemical plants, hazardous waste facilities, space systems, offshore and maritime systems, transportation systems, constructed infrastructure, and manufacturing plants. The journal normally publishes only articles that involve the analysis of substantive problems related to the reliability of complex systems or present techniques and/or theoretical results that have a discernable relationship to the solution of such problems. An important aim is to balance academic material and practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信