Plant-Based Meat consumption value: vegetarian and non-vegetarian

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Chui Seong Lim, Siew Chin Wong, Chu May Yeo
{"title":"Plant-Based Meat consumption value: vegetarian and non-vegetarian","authors":"Chui Seong Lim,&nbsp;Siew Chin Wong,&nbsp;Chu May Yeo","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>While the theory of consumption values (TCV) has explained various aspects of consumer choice, its application to plant-based meat is limited. This study addresses this gap by using TCV to understand plant-based meat purchase intentions, comparing and contrasting vegetarians and non-vegetarians.</div></div><div><h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3><div>Using mixed methods, the authors developed a questionnaire from focus groups (n = 16) and surveyed 402 participants (200 non-vegetarians, 202 vegetarians). Structural equation modelling and multigroup analysis explored group differences. Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis (IPMA) augmented the analysis by evaluating latent variable scores.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Functional values (health, utilitarian and guilt avoidance), social value, emotional value (overall emotional feeling) and conditional value impact the purchase intention of plant-based meat for both vegetarian and non-vegetarian groups. MGA analysis revealed that the relationship between conditional value and purchase intention was significantly stronger in the non-vegetarian group compared to the vegetarian group; and the relationship between functional value and purchase intention was stronger in the vegetarian group than in the non-vegetarian group.</div></div><div><h3>Originality/value</h3><div>It extends the relatively scant literature on plant-based meat and TCV by addressing consumption values from both vegetarian and non-vegetarian perspectives. The study utilizes data from Malaysia, a growing but under-researched market for plant-based meat. Finally, this work models a conceptual framework of plant-based meat and TCV for both vegetarian and non-vegetarian consumers.</div></div><div><h3>Contribution</h3><div>The findings of this research provide a framework explaining plant-based meat consumption by both vegetarians and non-vegetarians. Because vegetarians and non-vegetarians have different consumption values, marketers can leverage these differences to promote plant-based meat. For vegetarians preparing food for non-vegetarians, marketing should emphasize guilt avoidance associated with meat consumption. For broader adoption, promoting the availability of plant-based meat in food and beverage sectors, highlighting its convenience (easy recipes and preparation), and emphasizing its role in a transition towards reduced meat consumption can be effective. This transition, in turn, can contribute to reducing the harmful impact on the environment and ecosystem.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 108015"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325001680","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

While the theory of consumption values (TCV) has explained various aspects of consumer choice, its application to plant-based meat is limited. This study addresses this gap by using TCV to understand plant-based meat purchase intentions, comparing and contrasting vegetarians and non-vegetarians.

Design/methodology/approach

Using mixed methods, the authors developed a questionnaire from focus groups (n = 16) and surveyed 402 participants (200 non-vegetarians, 202 vegetarians). Structural equation modelling and multigroup analysis explored group differences. Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis (IPMA) augmented the analysis by evaluating latent variable scores.

Findings

Functional values (health, utilitarian and guilt avoidance), social value, emotional value (overall emotional feeling) and conditional value impact the purchase intention of plant-based meat for both vegetarian and non-vegetarian groups. MGA analysis revealed that the relationship between conditional value and purchase intention was significantly stronger in the non-vegetarian group compared to the vegetarian group; and the relationship between functional value and purchase intention was stronger in the vegetarian group than in the non-vegetarian group.

Originality/value

It extends the relatively scant literature on plant-based meat and TCV by addressing consumption values from both vegetarian and non-vegetarian perspectives. The study utilizes data from Malaysia, a growing but under-researched market for plant-based meat. Finally, this work models a conceptual framework of plant-based meat and TCV for both vegetarian and non-vegetarian consumers.

Contribution

The findings of this research provide a framework explaining plant-based meat consumption by both vegetarians and non-vegetarians. Because vegetarians and non-vegetarians have different consumption values, marketers can leverage these differences to promote plant-based meat. For vegetarians preparing food for non-vegetarians, marketing should emphasize guilt avoidance associated with meat consumption. For broader adoption, promoting the availability of plant-based meat in food and beverage sectors, highlighting its convenience (easy recipes and preparation), and emphasizing its role in a transition towards reduced meat consumption can be effective. This transition, in turn, can contribute to reducing the harmful impact on the environment and ecosystem.
植物性肉类消费价值:素食和非素食
虽然消费价值理论(TCV)已经解释了消费者选择的各个方面,但它在植物性肉类中的应用是有限的。本研究通过使用TCV来了解植物性肉类的购买意向,比较和对比素食者和非素食者,从而解决了这一差距。设计/方法/方法采用混合方法,作者从焦点小组(n = 16)中开发了一份问卷,调查了402名参与者(200名非素食者,202名素食者)。结构方程模型和多组分析探讨了组间差异。重要性-绩效矩阵分析(IPMA)通过评估潜在变量得分来增强分析。功能价值(健康、功利和避免内疚感)、社会价值、情感价值(整体情感感受)和条件价值影响素食者和非素食者对植物性肉的购买意愿。MGA分析显示,非素食者的条件价值与购买意愿的关系显著强于素食者;功能价值与购买意愿的关系在素食者组中强于非素食者组。原创性/价值它通过从素食和非素食的角度解决消费价值,扩展了相对较少的关于植物性肉类和TCV的文献。这项研究利用了马来西亚的数据,马来西亚是一个不断增长但研究不足的植物性肉类市场。最后,这项工作为素食和非素食消费者建立了植物性肉类和TCV的概念框架。贡献本研究的发现为素食者和非素食者的植物性肉类消费提供了一个框架。因为素食者和非素食者有不同的消费价值观,营销人员可以利用这些差异来推广植物性肉类。对于素食者为非素食者准备食物,营销应该强调避免与肉类消费相关的内疚。为了更广泛地采用植物性肉类,在食品和饮料行业推广植物性肉类,突出其便利性(简单的食谱和准备),并强调其在向减少肉类消费过渡中的作用,可能是有效的。这种转变反过来又有助于减少对环境和生态系统的有害影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信