{"title":"Plant-Based Meat consumption value: vegetarian and non-vegetarian","authors":"Chui Seong Lim, Siew Chin Wong, Chu May Yeo","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>While the theory of consumption values (TCV) has explained various aspects of consumer choice, its application to plant-based meat is limited. This study addresses this gap by using TCV to understand plant-based meat purchase intentions, comparing and contrasting vegetarians and non-vegetarians.</div></div><div><h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3><div>Using mixed methods, the authors developed a questionnaire from focus groups (n = 16) and surveyed 402 participants (200 non-vegetarians, 202 vegetarians). Structural equation modelling and multigroup analysis explored group differences. Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis (IPMA) augmented the analysis by evaluating latent variable scores.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Functional values (health, utilitarian and guilt avoidance), social value, emotional value (overall emotional feeling) and conditional value impact the purchase intention of plant-based meat for both vegetarian and non-vegetarian groups. MGA analysis revealed that the relationship between conditional value and purchase intention was significantly stronger in the non-vegetarian group compared to the vegetarian group; and the relationship between functional value and purchase intention was stronger in the vegetarian group than in the non-vegetarian group.</div></div><div><h3>Originality/value</h3><div>It extends the relatively scant literature on plant-based meat and TCV by addressing consumption values from both vegetarian and non-vegetarian perspectives. The study utilizes data from Malaysia, a growing but under-researched market for plant-based meat. Finally, this work models a conceptual framework of plant-based meat and TCV for both vegetarian and non-vegetarian consumers.</div></div><div><h3>Contribution</h3><div>The findings of this research provide a framework explaining plant-based meat consumption by both vegetarians and non-vegetarians. Because vegetarians and non-vegetarians have different consumption values, marketers can leverage these differences to promote plant-based meat. For vegetarians preparing food for non-vegetarians, marketing should emphasize guilt avoidance associated with meat consumption. For broader adoption, promoting the availability of plant-based meat in food and beverage sectors, highlighting its convenience (easy recipes and preparation), and emphasizing its role in a transition towards reduced meat consumption can be effective. This transition, in turn, can contribute to reducing the harmful impact on the environment and ecosystem.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 108015"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325001680","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
While the theory of consumption values (TCV) has explained various aspects of consumer choice, its application to plant-based meat is limited. This study addresses this gap by using TCV to understand plant-based meat purchase intentions, comparing and contrasting vegetarians and non-vegetarians.
Design/methodology/approach
Using mixed methods, the authors developed a questionnaire from focus groups (n = 16) and surveyed 402 participants (200 non-vegetarians, 202 vegetarians). Structural equation modelling and multigroup analysis explored group differences. Importance-Performance Matrix Analysis (IPMA) augmented the analysis by evaluating latent variable scores.
Findings
Functional values (health, utilitarian and guilt avoidance), social value, emotional value (overall emotional feeling) and conditional value impact the purchase intention of plant-based meat for both vegetarian and non-vegetarian groups. MGA analysis revealed that the relationship between conditional value and purchase intention was significantly stronger in the non-vegetarian group compared to the vegetarian group; and the relationship between functional value and purchase intention was stronger in the vegetarian group than in the non-vegetarian group.
Originality/value
It extends the relatively scant literature on plant-based meat and TCV by addressing consumption values from both vegetarian and non-vegetarian perspectives. The study utilizes data from Malaysia, a growing but under-researched market for plant-based meat. Finally, this work models a conceptual framework of plant-based meat and TCV for both vegetarian and non-vegetarian consumers.
Contribution
The findings of this research provide a framework explaining plant-based meat consumption by both vegetarians and non-vegetarians. Because vegetarians and non-vegetarians have different consumption values, marketers can leverage these differences to promote plant-based meat. For vegetarians preparing food for non-vegetarians, marketing should emphasize guilt avoidance associated with meat consumption. For broader adoption, promoting the availability of plant-based meat in food and beverage sectors, highlighting its convenience (easy recipes and preparation), and emphasizing its role in a transition towards reduced meat consumption can be effective. This transition, in turn, can contribute to reducing the harmful impact on the environment and ecosystem.
期刊介绍:
Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.