Re-evaluation of acesulfame K (E 950) as food additive

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF), Laurence Castle, Monica Andreassen, Gabriele Aquilina, Maria Lourdes Bastos, Polly Boon, Biagio Fallico, Reginald FitzGerald, Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez, Bettina Grasl-Kraupp, Ursula Gundert-Remy, Rainer Gürtler, Eric Houdeau, Marcin Kurek, Henriqueta Louro, Patricia Morales, Sabina Passamonti, Monika Batke, Ellen Bruzell, James Chipman, Karlien Cheyns, Riccardo Crebelli, Cristina Fortes, Peter Fürst, Thorhallur Halldorsson, Jean-Charles Leblanc, Manuela Mirat, Oliver Lindtner, Alicja Mortensen, Matthew Wright, Stefania Barmaz, Consuelo Civitella, Pauline Le Gall, Elena Mazzoli, Josef Daniel Rasinger, Ana Rincon, Alexandra Tard, Federica Lodi
{"title":"Re-evaluation of acesulfame K (E 950) as food additive","authors":"EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF),&nbsp;Laurence Castle,&nbsp;Monica Andreassen,&nbsp;Gabriele Aquilina,&nbsp;Maria Lourdes Bastos,&nbsp;Polly Boon,&nbsp;Biagio Fallico,&nbsp;Reginald FitzGerald,&nbsp;Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez,&nbsp;Bettina Grasl-Kraupp,&nbsp;Ursula Gundert-Remy,&nbsp;Rainer Gürtler,&nbsp;Eric Houdeau,&nbsp;Marcin Kurek,&nbsp;Henriqueta Louro,&nbsp;Patricia Morales,&nbsp;Sabina Passamonti,&nbsp;Monika Batke,&nbsp;Ellen Bruzell,&nbsp;James Chipman,&nbsp;Karlien Cheyns,&nbsp;Riccardo Crebelli,&nbsp;Cristina Fortes,&nbsp;Peter Fürst,&nbsp;Thorhallur Halldorsson,&nbsp;Jean-Charles Leblanc,&nbsp;Manuela Mirat,&nbsp;Oliver Lindtner,&nbsp;Alicja Mortensen,&nbsp;Matthew Wright,&nbsp;Stefania Barmaz,&nbsp;Consuelo Civitella,&nbsp;Pauline Le Gall,&nbsp;Elena Mazzoli,&nbsp;Josef Daniel Rasinger,&nbsp;Ana Rincon,&nbsp;Alexandra Tard,&nbsp;Federica Lodi","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present opinion deals with the re-evaluation of acesulfame K (E 950) as a food additive. Acesulfame K (E 950) is the chemically manufactured compound 6-methyl-1,2,3-oxathiazin-4(3H)-one-2,2-dioxide potassium salt. It is authorised for use in the European Union (EU) in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008. The assessment involved a comprehensive review of existing authorisations, evaluations and new scientific data. Acesulfame K (E 950) was found to be stable under various conditions; at pH lower than 3 with increasing temperatures, it is degraded to a certain amount. Based on the available data, no safety concerns arise for genotoxicity of acesulfame K (E 950) and its degradation products. For the potential impurities, based on in silico data, a concern for genotoxicity was identified for 5-chloro-acesulfame; a maximum limit of 0.1 mg/kg, or alternatively, a request for appropriate genotoxicity data was recommended. Based on the synthesis of systematically appraised evidence of human and animal studies, the Panel concluded that there are no new studies suitable for identification of a reference point (RP) on adverse effects. Consequently, the Panel established an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 15 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day based on the highest dose tested without adverse effects in a chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity study in rats; a study considered of moderate risk of bias and one of two key studies from the previous evaluations by the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) and the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). This revised ADI replaces the ADI of 9 mg/kg bw per day established by the SCF. The Panel noted that the highest estimate of exposure to acesulfame K (E 950) was generally below the ADI in all population groups. The Panel recommended the European Commission to consider the revision of the EU specifications of acesulfame K (E 950).</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9317","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9317","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present opinion deals with the re-evaluation of acesulfame K (E 950) as a food additive. Acesulfame K (E 950) is the chemically manufactured compound 6-methyl-1,2,3-oxathiazin-4(3H)-one-2,2-dioxide potassium salt. It is authorised for use in the European Union (EU) in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008. The assessment involved a comprehensive review of existing authorisations, evaluations and new scientific data. Acesulfame K (E 950) was found to be stable under various conditions; at pH lower than 3 with increasing temperatures, it is degraded to a certain amount. Based on the available data, no safety concerns arise for genotoxicity of acesulfame K (E 950) and its degradation products. For the potential impurities, based on in silico data, a concern for genotoxicity was identified for 5-chloro-acesulfame; a maximum limit of 0.1 mg/kg, or alternatively, a request for appropriate genotoxicity data was recommended. Based on the synthesis of systematically appraised evidence of human and animal studies, the Panel concluded that there are no new studies suitable for identification of a reference point (RP) on adverse effects. Consequently, the Panel established an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 15 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day based on the highest dose tested without adverse effects in a chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity study in rats; a study considered of moderate risk of bias and one of two key studies from the previous evaluations by the Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) and the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA). This revised ADI replaces the ADI of 9 mg/kg bw per day established by the SCF. The Panel noted that the highest estimate of exposure to acesulfame K (E 950) was generally below the ADI in all population groups. The Panel recommended the European Commission to consider the revision of the EU specifications of acesulfame K (E 950).

Abstract Image

安赛蜜K (e950)作为食品添加剂的再评价
本意见涉及对安赛蜜K (e950)作为食品添加剂的重新评价。乙酰磺胺K (e950)是化学合成的化合物6-甲基-1,2,3-恶噻嗪-4(3H)- 1 -2,2-二氧化钾盐。根据法规(EC) No 1333/2008授权在欧盟(EU)使用。评估包括对现有授权、评估和新的科学数据的全面审查。安赛蜜K (e950)在各种条件下都是稳定的;当pH值低于3时,随着温度的升高,降解到一定程度。根据现有数据,乙酰磺胺K (e950)及其降解产物的遗传毒性不存在安全问题。对于潜在的杂质,基于硅数据,确定了5-氯代乙酰磺胺的遗传毒性问题;建议最高限量为0.1 mg/kg,或者要求提供适当的遗传毒性数据。根据对人类和动物研究的系统评估证据的综合,小组得出结论,没有新的研究适合于确定不良影响的参考点。因此,专家小组根据在大鼠慢性毒性和致癌性研究中无不良反应的最高试验剂量,确定了每天15毫克/千克体重的可接受日摄入量(ADI);这是一项被认为具有中等偏倚风险的研究,也是食品科学委员会(SCF)和粮农组织/世卫组织食品添加剂联合专家委员会(JECFA)先前评估的两项关键研究之一。修订后的每日推荐摄入量取代了SCF制定的每日9毫克/千克体重的推荐摄入量。专家小组注意到,在所有人群中,对安赛蜜K (e950)暴露的最高估计通常低于建议摄入量。专家组建议欧盟委员会考虑修订欧盟安赛蜜K (e950)的规格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信