{"title":"Self-Efficacy of Teaching Assistants Working With Students With Disabilities","authors":"Alicia Greenbank, Galit Agam Ben Artzi","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The current research focused on examining the self-efficacy of one-to-one assistants working with students with disabilities who study in regular schools, compared to the self-efficacy of in-class teaching assistants working in special education classes in regular schools or in the special education system. The main goal of the research was to examine whether there are differences in the sense of self-efficacy between these teaching assistants and to understand the nature of the differences. Furthermore, the correlation between the sense of self-efficacy and background variables of the teaching assistants was examined: age, experience, participation in training and the kind of disability of the students they were working with have (Breyer et al. 2019; Higgins and Gulliford 2014). The sample included 291 teaching assistants in both elementary schools and high schools in Israel; 110 one- to- one assistants to students with disabilities integrated in regular classes, and 181 in-class assistants in special education. The assistants' ages range from 21 to over 51 years old and their years of work experience range from 1 year to over 11 years. A quantitative study was conducted. The data was collected using a Gibson & Dembo structured questionnaire (Gibson and Dembo, 1984), and was evaluated referring to four criteria: personal efficacy, academic efficacy, social efficacy, and emotional efficacy. The results of the research showed that there are significant differences between the two research groups. On all four self-efficacy parameters, the one-to-one assistants reported a higher sense of self-efficacy than the in-class teaching assistants. One-to-one assistants feel that they can influence a student's emotional, social, and academic performance to a greater degree than in-class teaching assistants. Furthermore, they associate the student's achievements with their own performance as teaching assistants to a greater degree than the in-class assistants. In reference to the type of disability, we found that one-to-one assistants to students with mental or behavioural disabilities reported a higher level of personal sense of self-efficacy as well as a higher level in the personal and emotional domains than those reported by in-class assistants, who work with students with the same disabilities in special education classes. A similar result was found according to social efficacy in their work with students with sensory or physical disabilities. The results of the research are important both for theory and practice. This research is preliminary, exposes us to the function of different types of teaching assistants, and presents the needs for developing systemic awareness for focusing and establishing the assistant's role, and for making it essential to involve the assistants in the educational work with children with disabilities.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The current research focused on examining the self-efficacy of one-to-one assistants working with students with disabilities who study in regular schools, compared to the self-efficacy of in-class teaching assistants working in special education classes in regular schools or in the special education system. The main goal of the research was to examine whether there are differences in the sense of self-efficacy between these teaching assistants and to understand the nature of the differences. Furthermore, the correlation between the sense of self-efficacy and background variables of the teaching assistants was examined: age, experience, participation in training and the kind of disability of the students they were working with have (Breyer et al. 2019; Higgins and Gulliford 2014). The sample included 291 teaching assistants in both elementary schools and high schools in Israel; 110 one- to- one assistants to students with disabilities integrated in regular classes, and 181 in-class assistants in special education. The assistants' ages range from 21 to over 51 years old and their years of work experience range from 1 year to over 11 years. A quantitative study was conducted. The data was collected using a Gibson & Dembo structured questionnaire (Gibson and Dembo, 1984), and was evaluated referring to four criteria: personal efficacy, academic efficacy, social efficacy, and emotional efficacy. The results of the research showed that there are significant differences between the two research groups. On all four self-efficacy parameters, the one-to-one assistants reported a higher sense of self-efficacy than the in-class teaching assistants. One-to-one assistants feel that they can influence a student's emotional, social, and academic performance to a greater degree than in-class teaching assistants. Furthermore, they associate the student's achievements with their own performance as teaching assistants to a greater degree than the in-class assistants. In reference to the type of disability, we found that one-to-one assistants to students with mental or behavioural disabilities reported a higher level of personal sense of self-efficacy as well as a higher level in the personal and emotional domains than those reported by in-class assistants, who work with students with the same disabilities in special education classes. A similar result was found according to social efficacy in their work with students with sensory or physical disabilities. The results of the research are important both for theory and practice. This research is preliminary, exposes us to the function of different types of teaching assistants, and presents the needs for developing systemic awareness for focusing and establishing the assistant's role, and for making it essential to involve the assistants in the educational work with children with disabilities.
目前的研究重点是检查在普通学校学习的残疾学生的一对一助教的自我效能感,与在普通学校或特殊教育系统的特殊教育班工作的课堂助教的自我效能感进行比较。这项研究的主要目的是检验这些助教之间的自我效能感是否存在差异,并了解差异的本质。此外,研究了助教的自我效能感与背景变量之间的相关性:年龄、经验、参与培训和他们所辅导的学生的残疾类型(Breyer et al. 2019;Higgins and Gulliford 2014)。样本包括以色列小学和高中的291名助教;普通班残疾学生一对一帮扶110人,特殊教育帮扶181人。助理的年龄从21岁到51岁以上,工作经验从1年到11年以上。进行了定量研究。数据是用Gibson &;Dembo结构化问卷(Gibson and Dembo, 1984),根据个人效能感、学术效能感、社会效能感和情感效能感四个标准进行评估。研究结果表明,两个研究组之间存在显著差异。在所有四个自我效能参数上,一对一助教报告的自我效能感高于课堂助教。一对一助教认为,他们比课堂助教更能影响学生的情感、社交和学业表现。此外,他们将学生的成就与自己作为助教的表现联系在一起,而不是课堂助教。在残疾类型方面,我们发现,与那些在特殊教育课程中为同样残疾的学生提供服务的课堂助理相比,为精神或行为残疾学生提供服务的一对一助理报告的个人自我效能感水平更高,在个人和情感领域的水平也更高。根据他们对有感官或身体残疾的学生的社会效能,也发现了类似的结果。研究结果具有重要的理论和实践意义。本研究是初步的,揭示了不同类型的助教的功能,提出了需要建立系统的认识,以关注和确立助教的角色,并使助教参与到残疾儿童的教育工作中来。
期刊介绍:
The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.