Group Role Three-Way Assignment for Managing Uncertainty in Role Negotiation

IF 9.4 1区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Shiyu Wu;Shenglin Li;Haibin Zhu;Rui Chen;Libo Zhang
{"title":"Group Role Three-Way Assignment for Managing Uncertainty in Role Negotiation","authors":"Shiyu Wu;Shenglin Li;Haibin Zhu;Rui Chen;Libo Zhang","doi":"10.1109/TCYB.2025.3558402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Role-based collaboration (RBC) is an innovative collaborative approach designed to enhance collaboration. Role negotiation (RN) is a critical step in RBC, during which the role set and the number of agents required for each role, i.e., role requirements, are determined. This process establishes the foundational input for group role assignment (GRA), where roles are assigned to agents to optimize group performance. Uncertainties in RN, such as task volume fluctuations, create dynamic agent requirements. However, existing RBC models typically assume RN to be static, thus failing to adequately address the substantial challenges. Three-way decision (3WD) is a robust decision-making methodology well-suited for managing uncertainty. To address the uncertainties in role requirements, this article introduces truncated discrete distribution to quantify role requirements, and presents a novel group role three-way assignment (GR3A) model. Compared with traditional RBC, our model offers an additional variable partial substitute choice that offers agents little salary during nonengagement periods but can transition to full involvement as required according to the prior agreement. GR3A is a dual-objective nonlinear optimization problem, for which a linearization strategy is proposed to achieve the optimal resolution. Additionally, sufficient and necessary conditions for these assignment problems are put forward to enhance the efficacy of the proposed solutions. To our knowledge, this study innovatively introduces a truncated discrete distribution and 3WD into the RBC framework. Empirical validation through simulations demonstrates the effectiveness and efficacy of the proposed method within the RBC context.","PeriodicalId":13112,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics","volume":"55 6","pages":"2924-2936"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10973080/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Role-based collaboration (RBC) is an innovative collaborative approach designed to enhance collaboration. Role negotiation (RN) is a critical step in RBC, during which the role set and the number of agents required for each role, i.e., role requirements, are determined. This process establishes the foundational input for group role assignment (GRA), where roles are assigned to agents to optimize group performance. Uncertainties in RN, such as task volume fluctuations, create dynamic agent requirements. However, existing RBC models typically assume RN to be static, thus failing to adequately address the substantial challenges. Three-way decision (3WD) is a robust decision-making methodology well-suited for managing uncertainty. To address the uncertainties in role requirements, this article introduces truncated discrete distribution to quantify role requirements, and presents a novel group role three-way assignment (GR3A) model. Compared with traditional RBC, our model offers an additional variable partial substitute choice that offers agents little salary during nonengagement periods but can transition to full involvement as required according to the prior agreement. GR3A is a dual-objective nonlinear optimization problem, for which a linearization strategy is proposed to achieve the optimal resolution. Additionally, sufficient and necessary conditions for these assignment problems are put forward to enhance the efficacy of the proposed solutions. To our knowledge, this study innovatively introduces a truncated discrete distribution and 3WD into the RBC framework. Empirical validation through simulations demonstrates the effectiveness and efficacy of the proposed method within the RBC context.
管理角色谈判中的不确定性的小组角色三向分配
基于角色的协作(RBC)是一种创新的协作方法,旨在增强协作。角色协商(RN)是RBC中的关键步骤,在此过程中确定角色集和每个角色所需的代理数量,即角色需求。此过程为组角色分配(GRA)建立基本输入,其中角色分配给代理以优化组性能。RN中的不确定性(如任务量波动)会产生动态代理需求。然而,现有的RBC模型通常假设RN是静态的,因此无法充分解决实质性的挑战。三向决策(3WD)是一种非常适合管理不确定性的稳健决策方法。针对角色需求中的不确定性,本文引入截断离散分布来量化角色需求,提出了一种新的群体角色三向分配(GR3A)模型。与传统的RBC相比,我们的模型提供了一个额外的可变部分替代选择,在不参与期间,代理人的工资很少,但可以根据事先的协议过渡到完全参与。GR3A是一个双目标非线性优化问题,针对该问题提出了一种线性化策略以达到最优解。并提出了这些赋值问题存在的充分必要条件,以提高所提方案的有效性。据我们所知,本研究创新性地将截断离散分布和3WD引入RBC框架。通过模拟的经验验证证明了在RBC环境中提出的方法的有效性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
CiteScore
25.40
自引率
11.00%
发文量
1869
期刊介绍: The scope of the IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics includes computational approaches to the field of cybernetics. Specifically, the transactions welcomes papers on communication and control across machines or machine, human, and organizations. The scope includes such areas as computational intelligence, computer vision, neural networks, genetic algorithms, machine learning, fuzzy systems, cognitive systems, decision making, and robotics, to the extent that they contribute to the theme of cybernetics or demonstrate an application of cybernetics principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信