Program completion and ACEN accreditation: leveraging data to strengthen nursing education

Abstract

Background

As a recognized programmatic accrediting agency, the Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing (ACEN) has a role in monitoring program quality through review of student learning and program outcomes data, including program completion rates.

Innovation

The ACEN uses the Annual Report and Substantive Change submissions to monitor the quality and outcomes for the programs it accredits. ACEN's recent proposal to revise the Substantive Change reporting process for program completion included a public comment period and led to a decision by the Board of Commissioners (BOC) to continue with the current procedure.

Implications

Nursing programs are required to assess on-time program completion, as it provides the ACEN with consistent data for program comparison. Programs are also encouraged to assess additional program completion metrics, such as 150% or ultimate program completion, based on program factors. Programs should set realistic and genuine expected level of achievement benchmarks and should use the current Policy #14 substantive change procedure to report significant changes.

Conclusion

Program-specific evaluation and analysis of completion data should be used to set benchmarks and develop student support services as well as strategies for success. Timely completion of a nursing program of study followed by obtaining licensure can increase the nursing workforce and contribute to healthcare quality.