Active Participants vs. Observers in Educational Simulations: Impact on Practical Skills Exam Results in Nursing Education: An Exploratory Design

IF 1.9 Q2 NURSING
Jill Flo, Elisabeth Solheim
{"title":"Active Participants vs. Observers in Educational Simulations: Impact on Practical Skills Exam Results in Nursing Education: An Exploratory Design","authors":"Jill Flo,&nbsp;Elisabeth Solheim","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Second-year bachelor's students had a 2-day simulation session followed by a practical skills exam and oral questioning 2 weeks later.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To explore whether a student's role, as an active participant or an observer, had an impact on their results in the subsequent practical skills exam.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An exploratory design was used to compare the results of 248 students in a practical skills exam. 104 students participated as active participants in the preparatory simulation, while the remaining 144 students served as observers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No overall statistically significant difference was found between students who actively participated in a simulation and those who only observed in terms of passing or failing the practical skills exam. However, students who had taken the Methods and Interventions course before the Clinical Practice course, active participants in the simulation had a significantly higher pass rate (p &lt; 0.05) than observers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Overall, being an active participant or a directed observer in the preparatory simulation appears to have the same value for the practical skills exam pass rate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"20 2","pages":"Pages e536-e541"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308725000162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Second-year bachelor's students had a 2-day simulation session followed by a practical skills exam and oral questioning 2 weeks later.

Aim

To explore whether a student's role, as an active participant or an observer, had an impact on their results in the subsequent practical skills exam.

Methods

An exploratory design was used to compare the results of 248 students in a practical skills exam. 104 students participated as active participants in the preparatory simulation, while the remaining 144 students served as observers.

Results

No overall statistically significant difference was found between students who actively participated in a simulation and those who only observed in terms of passing or failing the practical skills exam. However, students who had taken the Methods and Interventions course before the Clinical Practice course, active participants in the simulation had a significantly higher pass rate (p < 0.05) than observers.

Conclusions

Overall, being an active participant or a directed observer in the preparatory simulation appears to have the same value for the practical skills exam pass rate.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信