Active Participants vs. Observers in Educational Simulations: Impact on Practical Skills Exam Results in Nursing Education: An Exploratory Design

IF 1.9 Q2 NURSING

Teaching and Learning in Nursing Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.teln.2025.01.003

Jill Flo, Elisabeth Solheim

{"title":"Active Participants vs. Observers in Educational Simulations: Impact on Practical Skills Exam Results in Nursing Education: An Exploratory Design","authors":"Jill Flo, Elisabeth Solheim","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Second-year bachelor's students had a 2-day simulation session followed by a practical skills exam and oral questioning 2 weeks later.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To explore whether a student's role, as an active participant or an observer, had an impact on their results in the subsequent practical skills exam.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An exploratory design was used to compare the results of 248 students in a practical skills exam. 104 students participated as active participants in the preparatory simulation, while the remaining 144 students served as observers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No overall statistically significant difference was found between students who actively participated in a simulation and those who only observed in terms of passing or failing the practical skills exam. However, students who had taken the Methods and Interventions course before the Clinical Practice course, active participants in the simulation had a significantly higher pass rate (p < 0.05) than observers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Overall, being an active participant or a directed observer in the preparatory simulation appears to have the same value for the practical skills exam pass rate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"20 2","pages":"Pages e536-e541"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308725000162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Second-year bachelor's students had a 2-day simulation session followed by a practical skills exam and oral questioning 2 weeks later.

Aim

To explore whether a student's role, as an active participant or an observer, had an impact on their results in the subsequent practical skills exam.

Methods

An exploratory design was used to compare the results of 248 students in a practical skills exam. 104 students participated as active participants in the preparatory simulation, while the remaining 144 students served as observers.

Results

No overall statistically significant difference was found between students who actively participated in a simulation and those who only observed in terms of passing or failing the practical skills exam. However, students who had taken the Methods and Interventions course before the Clinical Practice course, active participants in the simulation had a significantly higher pass rate (p < 0.05) than observers.

Conclusions

Overall, being an active participant or a directed observer in the preparatory simulation appears to have the same value for the practical skills exam pass rate.

查看原文本刊更多论文

教育模拟中的积极参与者与观察者：对护理教育实践技能考试结果的影响：一项探索性设计

本科二年级的学生进行了为期两天的模拟课程，两周后进行了实践技能考试和口头提问。目的探讨学生作为积极参与者或观察者的角色是否会影响他们在随后的实践技能考试中的成绩。方法采用探索性设计对248名学生的实践技能考试结果进行比较。104名学生作为预备模拟的积极参与者，144名学生作为观察员。结果积极参与模拟的学生与只观察的学生在实践技能考试的及格和不及格方面没有统计学上的差异。然而，在临床实践课程之前学习方法与干预课程的学生，积极参与模拟的学生有显著更高的通过率(p <；0.05)。结论总体而言，在预备模拟中作为主动参与者或直接观察者对实践技能考试通过率具有相同的价值。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Teaching and Learning in Nursing NURSING-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

10.50%

发文量

119

审稿时长

37 days

期刊介绍： Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty