Evaluating the gather analyse summarize self-debriefing model in nursing students after simulation: a cross-sectional study

IF 1.9 Q2 NURSING
Silvia Belloni , Ida Vangone , Rosario Caruso , Arianna Magon , Gianluca Conte , Maria Grazia Merlo , Barbara Bascapè , Cristina Arrigoni
{"title":"Evaluating the gather analyse summarize self-debriefing model in nursing students after simulation: a cross-sectional study","authors":"Silvia Belloni ,&nbsp;Ida Vangone ,&nbsp;Rosario Caruso ,&nbsp;Arianna Magon ,&nbsp;Gianluca Conte ,&nbsp;Maria Grazia Merlo ,&nbsp;Barbara Bascapè ,&nbsp;Cristina Arrigoni","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Debriefing is essential in simulation-based learning for nursing students, fostering critical thinking and clinical reasoning. The “Gather Analyze Summarize” (GAS) tool is a self-debriefing instrument, yet there is limited research on its effectiveness from the student perspective.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate first-year Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BScN) students’ experiences with the GAS tool after simulation sessions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were collected cross-sectionally and through an electronic survey using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) to assess the GAS tool experience. Structural equation modelling was used to analyze the relationships between experience factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>151 nursing students were enrolled. The results indicated high satisfaction with the GAS. University satisfaction was a significant predictor of a positive experience with the GAS (Estimate = 0.45, p &lt; 0.001), while age had a minor negative effect (Estimate = -0.18, p = 0.042).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The GAS tool was positively perceived as an effective self-debriefing method in simulation practice, enhancing critical thinking. Enhancing the tool's reliability across other dimensions could improve overall student satisfaction and learning outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"20 2","pages":"Pages e528-e535"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308725000113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Debriefing is essential in simulation-based learning for nursing students, fostering critical thinking and clinical reasoning. The “Gather Analyze Summarize” (GAS) tool is a self-debriefing instrument, yet there is limited research on its effectiveness from the student perspective.

Aim

This study aimed to evaluate first-year Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BScN) students’ experiences with the GAS tool after simulation sessions.

Methods

Data were collected cross-sectionally and through an electronic survey using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) to assess the GAS tool experience. Structural equation modelling was used to analyze the relationships between experience factors.

Results

151 nursing students were enrolled. The results indicated high satisfaction with the GAS. University satisfaction was a significant predictor of a positive experience with the GAS (Estimate = 0.45, p < 0.001), while age had a minor negative effect (Estimate = -0.18, p = 0.042).

Conclusions

The GAS tool was positively perceived as an effective self-debriefing method in simulation practice, enhancing critical thinking. Enhancing the tool's reliability across other dimensions could improve overall student satisfaction and learning outcomes.
评估护理学生模拟后的聚集分析总结自我述职模式:一项横断面研究
在护理学生的模拟学习中,汇报是必不可少的,可以培养批判性思维和临床推理能力。“收集分析总结”(GAS)工具是一种自我汇报工具,但从学生的角度对其有效性的研究有限。目的本研究旨在评估一年级护理学学士(BScN)学生在模拟课程后使用GAS工具的体验。方法收集数据,并通过使用用户体验问卷(UEQ)的电子调查来评估GAS工具的体验。采用结构方程模型分析经验因素之间的关系。结果共纳入151名护理专业学生。结果表明,用户对气体检测仪非常满意。大学满意度是GAS积极体验的显著预测因子(估计 = 0.45,p <;0.001),而年龄有轻微的负影响(估计 = -0.18,p = 0.042)。结论在模拟实践中,GAS工具被积极地认为是一种有效的自我汇报方法,增强了批判性思维。提高工具在其他方面的可靠性可以提高学生的整体满意度和学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信