Clinical validation of droplet digital PCR assays in detecting BRAFV600-mutant circulating tumour DNA as a prognostic biomarker in patients with resected stage III melanoma receiving adjuvant therapy (COMBI-AD): a biomarker analysis from a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial

Mahrukh M Syeda, Georgina V Long, James Garrett, Victoria Atkinson, Mario Santinami, Dirk Schadendorf, Axel Hauschild, Michael Millward, Mario Mandala, Vanna Chiarion-Sileni, Michael Smylie, Georgy M Manikhas, Reinhard Dummer, Jennifer M Wiggins, Saim Ali, Sachin Bajirao Adnaik, Monique Tan, Maya Dajee, David Polsky
{"title":"Clinical validation of droplet digital PCR assays in detecting BRAFV600-mutant circulating tumour DNA as a prognostic biomarker in patients with resected stage III melanoma receiving adjuvant therapy (COMBI-AD): a biomarker analysis from a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial","authors":"Mahrukh M Syeda, Georgina V Long, James Garrett, Victoria Atkinson, Mario Santinami, Dirk Schadendorf, Axel Hauschild, Michael Millward, Mario Mandala, Vanna Chiarion-Sileni, Michael Smylie, Georgy M Manikhas, Reinhard Dummer, Jennifer M Wiggins, Saim Ali, Sachin Bajirao Adnaik, Monique Tan, Maya Dajee, David Polsky","doi":"10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00139-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Cell-free, circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is an established measure of minimal residual disease; however, it is not utilised in melanoma management. We investigated whether ctDNA measurements could predict survival outcomes during adjuvant targeted therapy or placebo treatment in stage III melanoma, thereby identifying patients at high risk and low risk of recurrence.<h3>Methods</h3>Analytically validated mutation-specific droplet digital PCR assays were used to measure <em>BRAF</em><sup>V600E</sup> or <em>BRAF</em><sup>V600K</sup> ctDNA in patients aged 18 years or older who were enrolled in the COMBI-AD trial, which was a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study of oral dabrafenib (150 mg twice daily) plus oral trametinib (2 mg once daily) combination therapy versus two matched placebos in resected <em>BRAF</em><sup>V600</sup>-mutant stage III melanoma. Patients were screened for enrolment between Jan 31, 2013, and Dec 11, 2014, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and were randomly assigned (1:1) to the two treatment groups. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival, and the results from final analysis have been previously published and will not be described here. Biomarker analysis was a prespecified exploratory endpoint and performed in the intention-to-treat population. We compared associations between survival outcomes and baseline (post-resection) ctDNA copies per mL, tumour mutational burden and interferon gamma (<em>IFNG</em>) gene expression. In a subset of patients, ctDNA quantities during follow-up or at recurrence were measured. The trial is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, <span><span>NCT01682083</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>, and has been completed.<h3>Findings</h3>Baseline plasma samples were available for 597 of 870 patients (331 male patients and 266 female patients) and samples for assessing the ctDNA positivity rate at landmark follow-up timepoints of 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months after treatment initiation were available for 94 of 870 patients. Additionally, samples were available from 118 of 870 patients within a 2-month timeframe before or after clinical or radiographic recurrence. Median follow-up for the biomarker analyses was 60 months (IQR 39–66) in the combination therapy group and 58 months (21–66) for the placebo group. ctDNA was detectable in 79 (13%) of 597 baseline samples. ctDNA positivity rate and mutant copies per mL plasma were significantly higher in patients with higher disease substages. As a binary variable, ctDNA detection was associated with worse recurrence-free survival (placebo group: median 3·71 months [95% CI 2·39–6·89] <em>vs</em> 24·41 months [17·28–43·13]; hazard ratio [HR] 2·91 [95% CI 1·99–4·25], p&lt;0·0001); combination therapy group: median 16·59 months [95% CI 12·02–26·80] <em>vs</em> 68·11 months [50·36–not reached]; HR 2·98 [1·95–4·54], p&lt;0·0001) and overall survival (placebo group: median 33·90 months [13·96–not reached] <em>vs</em> not reached; HR 3·35 [2·01–5·55], p&lt;0·0001); combination therapy group: median 40·31 months [24·90–not reached] <em>vs</em> not reached; HR 4·27 [2·50–7·27], p&lt;0·0001) in the placebo group and combination therapy groups. Baseline ctDNA was more strongly associated with survival outcomes than <em>IFNG</em> gene expression or tumour mutational burden. Patients with adverse longitudinal ctDNA kinetics (molecular relapse or persistently positive) had markedly shorter median recurrence-free survival (8·31 months [95% CI 5·39–12·20] and 5·32 months [2·79–not reached], respectively) compared with patients with favourable kinetics (ie, undetectable after positive baseline result: 19·25 months [16·39–not reached]; and durable undetectable: not reached [38·44–not reached], p&lt;0·0001).<h3>Interpretation</h3>Droplet digital PCR measurements of ctDNA to assess minimal residual disease before adjuvant targeted therapy and during follow-up can identify patients at high risk of early recurrence. Additional studies using ctDNA measurements to guide therapeutic interventions might lead to improvements in the management of resected stage III melanoma.<h3>Funding</h3>Novartis.","PeriodicalId":22865,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Oncology","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00139-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cell-free, circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is an established measure of minimal residual disease; however, it is not utilised in melanoma management. We investigated whether ctDNA measurements could predict survival outcomes during adjuvant targeted therapy or placebo treatment in stage III melanoma, thereby identifying patients at high risk and low risk of recurrence.

Methods

Analytically validated mutation-specific droplet digital PCR assays were used to measure BRAFV600E or BRAFV600K ctDNA in patients aged 18 years or older who were enrolled in the COMBI-AD trial, which was a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study of oral dabrafenib (150 mg twice daily) plus oral trametinib (2 mg once daily) combination therapy versus two matched placebos in resected BRAFV600-mutant stage III melanoma. Patients were screened for enrolment between Jan 31, 2013, and Dec 11, 2014, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and were randomly assigned (1:1) to the two treatment groups. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival, and the results from final analysis have been previously published and will not be described here. Biomarker analysis was a prespecified exploratory endpoint and performed in the intention-to-treat population. We compared associations between survival outcomes and baseline (post-resection) ctDNA copies per mL, tumour mutational burden and interferon gamma (IFNG) gene expression. In a subset of patients, ctDNA quantities during follow-up or at recurrence were measured. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01682083, and has been completed.

Findings

Baseline plasma samples were available for 597 of 870 patients (331 male patients and 266 female patients) and samples for assessing the ctDNA positivity rate at landmark follow-up timepoints of 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months after treatment initiation were available for 94 of 870 patients. Additionally, samples were available from 118 of 870 patients within a 2-month timeframe before or after clinical or radiographic recurrence. Median follow-up for the biomarker analyses was 60 months (IQR 39–66) in the combination therapy group and 58 months (21–66) for the placebo group. ctDNA was detectable in 79 (13%) of 597 baseline samples. ctDNA positivity rate and mutant copies per mL plasma were significantly higher in patients with higher disease substages. As a binary variable, ctDNA detection was associated with worse recurrence-free survival (placebo group: median 3·71 months [95% CI 2·39–6·89] vs 24·41 months [17·28–43·13]; hazard ratio [HR] 2·91 [95% CI 1·99–4·25], p<0·0001); combination therapy group: median 16·59 months [95% CI 12·02–26·80] vs 68·11 months [50·36–not reached]; HR 2·98 [1·95–4·54], p<0·0001) and overall survival (placebo group: median 33·90 months [13·96–not reached] vs not reached; HR 3·35 [2·01–5·55], p<0·0001); combination therapy group: median 40·31 months [24·90–not reached] vs not reached; HR 4·27 [2·50–7·27], p<0·0001) in the placebo group and combination therapy groups. Baseline ctDNA was more strongly associated with survival outcomes than IFNG gene expression or tumour mutational burden. Patients with adverse longitudinal ctDNA kinetics (molecular relapse or persistently positive) had markedly shorter median recurrence-free survival (8·31 months [95% CI 5·39–12·20] and 5·32 months [2·79–not reached], respectively) compared with patients with favourable kinetics (ie, undetectable after positive baseline result: 19·25 months [16·39–not reached]; and durable undetectable: not reached [38·44–not reached], p<0·0001).

Interpretation

Droplet digital PCR measurements of ctDNA to assess minimal residual disease before adjuvant targeted therapy and during follow-up can identify patients at high risk of early recurrence. Additional studies using ctDNA measurements to guide therapeutic interventions might lead to improvements in the management of resected stage III melanoma.

Funding

Novartis.
在接受辅助治疗(combination - ad)的III期黑色素瘤切除患者中,微滴数字PCR检测brafv600突变循环肿瘤DNA作为预后生物标志物的临床验证:一项来自双盲、随机3期试验的生物标志物分析
无细胞循环肿瘤DNA (ctDNA)是一种确定的最小残留疾病的测量方法;然而,它并未用于黑色素瘤的治疗。我们研究了ctDNA测量是否可以预测III期黑色素瘤患者在辅助靶向治疗或安慰剂治疗期间的生存结果,从而确定高风险和低风险复发患者。方法采用经分析验证的突变特异性微滴数字PCR方法,对参加COMBI-AD试验的18岁及以上患者的BRAFV600E或BRAFV600K ctDNA进行检测。COMBI-AD试验是一项双盲、随机、3期研究,在brafv600突变的III期黑色素瘤切除患者中,口服达非尼(150mg,每日2次)加口服曲美替尼(2mg,每日1次)联合治疗与两种匹配的安慰剂对比。在2013年1月31日至2014年12月11日期间筛选入组的患者,其东部肿瘤合作组表现状态为0或1,随机分为两个治疗组(1:1)。主要终点是无复发生存期,最终分析的结果之前已经发表,这里不再描述。生物标志物分析是预先指定的探索性终点,并在意向治疗人群中进行。我们比较了生存结果与基线(切除后)每mL ctDNA拷贝数、肿瘤突变负担和干扰素γ (IFNG)基因表达之间的关系。在一部分患者中,在随访期间或复发时测量ctDNA的量。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT01682083,并已完成。研究结果:870例患者中有597例(331例男性患者和266例女性患者)获得了基线血浆样本,870例患者中有94例患者在治疗开始后3个月、6个月、9个月和12个月的标志性随访时间点获得了评估ctDNA阳性率的样本。此外,870例患者中有118例在临床或影像学复发前后2个月内获得了样本。生物标志物分析的中位随访时间,联合治疗组为60个月(IQR 39-66),安慰剂组为58个月(21-66)。597个基线样本中有79个(13%)检测到ctDNA。ctDNA阳性率和每mL血浆突变拷贝数在疾病分期较高的患者中显著升高。作为一个二元变量,ctDNA检测与较差的无复发生存期相关(安慰剂组:中位3.71个月[95% CI 2.39 - 6.89] vs 24.41个月[17.28 - 43.13];风险比[HR] 2.91 [95% CI 1.99 ~ 4.25], p< 0.0001);联合治疗组:中位16.59个月[95% CI 12.02 - 26.80] vs . 68.11个月[50.36 -未达];HR 2.98 [1.95 - 4.54], p< 0.0001)和总生存期(安慰剂组:中位33.90个月[13.96 -未达到]vs未达到;HR 3.35 [2.01 - 5.55], p< 0.0001);联合治疗组:中位40·31个月[24.90 -未达到]vs未达到;安慰剂组和联合治疗组的HR为4.27 [2.50 - 7.27],p< 0.0001)。与IFNG基因表达或肿瘤突变负担相比,基线ctDNA与生存结果的相关性更强。纵向ctDNA动力学不良的患者(分子复发或持续阳性)的中位无复发生存期(分别为8.31个月[95% CI 5.39 - 12.20]和5.32个月[2.79 -未达到])明显短于动力学良好的患者(即基线结果阳性后无法检测:19.25个月[16.39 -未达到]);持久不可检测:not reached [38.44 - not reached], p< 0.0001)。在辅助靶向治疗前和随访期间,ctDNA的微滴数字PCR测量可评估最小残留疾病,可识别早期复发高风险患者。使用ctDNA测量来指导治疗干预的其他研究可能会改善切除的III期黑色素瘤的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信