A techno-economic assessment framework for district-scale thermal source networks serving existing buildings

IF 6.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Alireza Etemad , Alessandro Maccarini , Donal Finn , Alireza Afshari , Divyanshu Sood , James O’Donnell
{"title":"A techno-economic assessment framework for district-scale thermal source networks serving existing buildings","authors":"Alireza Etemad ,&nbsp;Alessandro Maccarini ,&nbsp;Donal Finn ,&nbsp;Alireza Afshari ,&nbsp;Divyanshu Sood ,&nbsp;James O’Donnell","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Thermal Source Network (TSN)s are ultra-low-temperature district heating systems that use decentralised heat pumps, offering significant potential for urban heating decarbonization. While previous research has extensively examined the application of TSNs in newly constructed, energy-efficient buildings, studies on their feasibility in older, inefficient building stocks remain limited and less systematically explored. This study introduces a techno-economic framework to evaluate the feasibility of connecting districts with older, low-rated buildings to TSNs. The framework provides a systematic approach to assess economic viability, using Levelised Cost of Heat (LCOH) as a financial metric, and environmental performance. By integrating GIS-based Energy Performance Certificates (EPC) data and building archetype models, it estimates district heat demand, calculates the necessary network and equipment capacities, and evaluates the economic and environmental impacts of TSNs at different building-level temperatures. The study also reviews strategies for reducing Space Heating Water Temperature (SHWT) at the building level, including their costs and potential to achieve lower SHWT targets. The analysis compares TSNs with other heat electrification scenarios, including centralised district heating with Ground-Source Heat Pump (GSHP) and Air-Source Heat Pump (ASHP), and individual ASHPs. The results indicate that TSNs are the most economically attractive solution when substations are owned by the district heating company, mainly due to the lower electricity prices for businesses in the studied case. In contrast, centralised district heating becomes the most viable option when substations are owned by households, which incur higher electricity prices. TSNs also provide significant environmental advantages, with lower operational carbon footprints compared to other alternatives. For TSNs, every 1 <span><math><msup><mrow></mrow><mo>∘</mo></msup></math></span>C reduction in building SHWT reduces the LCOH with environmental externalities by 1.99 to 2.24 €/MWh<sub>heat</sub>, depending on the system configuration. This study evaluates ownership and pricing policies, demonstrating how centralised ownership and business electricity tariffs enhance the economic feasibility of TSNs. By addressing an important gap in the literature, this study offers a structured approach for policymakers to enhance the feasibility of TSNs in older areas through targeted retrofitting and heating system optimization, supporting their adoption as a scalable and sustainable solution for urban heating systems, particularly in districts with ageing building stocks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"338 ","pages":"Article 115737"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825004670","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thermal Source Network (TSN)s are ultra-low-temperature district heating systems that use decentralised heat pumps, offering significant potential for urban heating decarbonization. While previous research has extensively examined the application of TSNs in newly constructed, energy-efficient buildings, studies on their feasibility in older, inefficient building stocks remain limited and less systematically explored. This study introduces a techno-economic framework to evaluate the feasibility of connecting districts with older, low-rated buildings to TSNs. The framework provides a systematic approach to assess economic viability, using Levelised Cost of Heat (LCOH) as a financial metric, and environmental performance. By integrating GIS-based Energy Performance Certificates (EPC) data and building archetype models, it estimates district heat demand, calculates the necessary network and equipment capacities, and evaluates the economic and environmental impacts of TSNs at different building-level temperatures. The study also reviews strategies for reducing Space Heating Water Temperature (SHWT) at the building level, including their costs and potential to achieve lower SHWT targets. The analysis compares TSNs with other heat electrification scenarios, including centralised district heating with Ground-Source Heat Pump (GSHP) and Air-Source Heat Pump (ASHP), and individual ASHPs. The results indicate that TSNs are the most economically attractive solution when substations are owned by the district heating company, mainly due to the lower electricity prices for businesses in the studied case. In contrast, centralised district heating becomes the most viable option when substations are owned by households, which incur higher electricity prices. TSNs also provide significant environmental advantages, with lower operational carbon footprints compared to other alternatives. For TSNs, every 1 C reduction in building SHWT reduces the LCOH with environmental externalities by 1.99 to 2.24 €/MWhheat, depending on the system configuration. This study evaluates ownership and pricing policies, demonstrating how centralised ownership and business electricity tariffs enhance the economic feasibility of TSNs. By addressing an important gap in the literature, this study offers a structured approach for policymakers to enhance the feasibility of TSNs in older areas through targeted retrofitting and heating system optimization, supporting their adoption as a scalable and sustainable solution for urban heating systems, particularly in districts with ageing building stocks.

Abstract Image

为现有建筑服务的区域规模热源网络的技术经济评估框架
热源网络(TSN)是使用分散式热泵的超低温区域供热系统,为城市供暖脱碳提供了巨大的潜力。虽然以前的研究已经广泛地研究了tsn在新建的节能建筑中的应用,但对其在旧的、低效的建筑存量中的可行性的研究仍然有限,而且没有进行系统的探索。本研究引入了一个技术经济框架来评估将具有较老、低评级建筑的地区连接到tsn的可行性。该框架提供了一种系统的方法来评估经济可行性,使用热量均等化成本(LCOH)作为财务指标和环境绩效。通过整合基于gis的能源绩效证书(EPC)数据和建筑原型模型,它估算了区域热需求,计算了必要的网络和设备容量,并评估了tsn在不同建筑温度下的经济和环境影响。本研究亦检讨了在建筑物层面降低空间加热水温的策略,包括成本和实现较低空间加热水温目标的潜力。该分析将tsn与其他热电化方案进行了比较,包括采用地源热泵(GSHP)和空气源热泵(ASHP)的集中区域供热,以及单独的空气源热泵。结果表明,当变电站归区域供热公司所有时,tsn是最具经济吸引力的解决方案,主要原因是研究案例中企业的电价较低。相比之下,当变电站为家庭所有时,集中区域供热成为最可行的选择,这将导致更高的电价。tsn还具有显著的环境优势,与其他替代方案相比,其运行碳足迹更低。对于tsn来说,建筑SHWT每减少1 °C,具有环境外部性的LCOH就会减少1.99至2.24欧元/平方米小麦,具体取决于系统配置。本研究评估了所有权和定价政策,展示了集中所有权和商业电价如何提高tsn的经济可行性。通过解决文献中的一个重要空白,本研究为政策制定者提供了一种结构化的方法,通过有针对性的改造和供暖系统优化,提高老旧地区tsn的可行性,支持将其作为城市供暖系统的可扩展和可持续解决方案,特别是在建筑存量老化的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信