Predicting Maximal Military Occupational Task Performance from Physical Fitness Tests using Machine Learning.

Ayden McCarthy,Jodie Anne Wills,Joel Thomas Fuller,Steve Cassidy,Brad C Nindl,Tim L A Doyle
{"title":"Predicting Maximal Military Occupational Task Performance from Physical Fitness Tests using Machine Learning.","authors":"Ayden McCarthy,Jodie Anne Wills,Joel Thomas Fuller,Steve Cassidy,Brad C Nindl,Tim L A Doyle","doi":"10.1249/mss.0000000000003727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Optimal performance in military tasks is crucial for operation success. These tasks are often simulated in training, assessing personnel performance within a military environment. However, these assessments are time-consuming and an injury risk. Physical characteristics such as muscular strength, power, aerobic endurance, and circumferences can be used to predict these dynamic and demanding tasks. Utilising machine learning models to predict assessment outcomes may lead to optimised management of personnel, time, and interventions in the military. Methods: This study recruited 35 participants to complete two physical sessions assessing multiple physical characteristics and lift-to-place and jerry-can-carry assessments. Machine learning models were developed to predict assessment outcomes based on a down-selection of physical characteristics metrics. Root mean square error (RMSE), normalised root mean square error (NRMSE), and coefficient of variation of the root mean square error (CVRMSE) were used to evaluate the models' predictive capabilities. Results: The Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Ridge Models could predict the lift-to-place outcome to a RMSE of ±1.77 kg (NRMSE = 4.44%; CVRMSE = 0.18) and ± 2.33 kg (NRMSE = 5.84%; CVRMSE = 0.24) with four and three physical tests, respectively. The Multi-Layer Preceptor and SVR models predicted the jerry-can-carry outcome to ±3.36 laps (NRMSE = 23.06%; CVRMSE = 0.39) and ± 3.67 laps (NRMSE = 25.20%; CVRMSE = 0.42) with twelve and eight physical tests, respectively. Conclusions: The lift-to-place outcome can be accurately predicted, showing potential military implementation. The jerry-can-carry outcome shows promise; however, further model optimisation and training metrics are required to reduce error. Machine learning models demonstrate their applicability to optimise occupational selection pathways and training interventions for desirable performance in military settings.","PeriodicalId":18500,"journal":{"name":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Optimal performance in military tasks is crucial for operation success. These tasks are often simulated in training, assessing personnel performance within a military environment. However, these assessments are time-consuming and an injury risk. Physical characteristics such as muscular strength, power, aerobic endurance, and circumferences can be used to predict these dynamic and demanding tasks. Utilising machine learning models to predict assessment outcomes may lead to optimised management of personnel, time, and interventions in the military. Methods: This study recruited 35 participants to complete two physical sessions assessing multiple physical characteristics and lift-to-place and jerry-can-carry assessments. Machine learning models were developed to predict assessment outcomes based on a down-selection of physical characteristics metrics. Root mean square error (RMSE), normalised root mean square error (NRMSE), and coefficient of variation of the root mean square error (CVRMSE) were used to evaluate the models' predictive capabilities. Results: The Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Ridge Models could predict the lift-to-place outcome to a RMSE of ±1.77 kg (NRMSE = 4.44%; CVRMSE = 0.18) and ± 2.33 kg (NRMSE = 5.84%; CVRMSE = 0.24) with four and three physical tests, respectively. The Multi-Layer Preceptor and SVR models predicted the jerry-can-carry outcome to ±3.36 laps (NRMSE = 23.06%; CVRMSE = 0.39) and ± 3.67 laps (NRMSE = 25.20%; CVRMSE = 0.42) with twelve and eight physical tests, respectively. Conclusions: The lift-to-place outcome can be accurately predicted, showing potential military implementation. The jerry-can-carry outcome shows promise; however, further model optimisation and training metrics are required to reduce error. Machine learning models demonstrate their applicability to optimise occupational selection pathways and training interventions for desirable performance in military settings.
利用机器学习从体能测试中预测最大军事职业任务表现。
目的:军事任务的最佳性能对作战成功至关重要。这些任务通常在训练中进行模拟,评估人员在军事环境中的表现。然而,这些评估既耗时又有伤害风险。身体特征,如肌肉力量、力量、有氧耐力和周长,可以用来预测这些动态和苛刻的任务。利用机器学习模型预测评估结果可能会优化军事人员、时间和干预措施的管理。方法:本研究招募了35名参与者完成两个物理会话,评估多种物理特征,以及升降和移动评估。开发了机器学习模型来预测基于物理特征指标的下选择的评估结果。使用均方根误差(RMSE)、归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)和均方根误差变异系数(CVRMSE)来评估模型的预测能力。结果:使用支持向量回归(SVR)和Ridge模型预测患者的抬至就位结果的RMSE为±1.77 kg (NRMSE = 4.44%;CVRMSE = 0.18)和±2.33 kg (NRMSE = 5.84%;CVRMSE = 0.24),分别进行四次和三次物理测试。多层感知器和SVR模型预测偷运结果为±3.36圈(NRMSE = 23.06%;CVRMSE = 0.39)和±3.67圈(NRMSE = 25.20%;CVRMSE = 0.42),分别进行12次和8次物理测试。结论:可准确预测升降就位结果,具有军事应用潜力。偷工减料的结果显示了希望;然而,需要进一步的模型优化和训练指标来减少误差。机器学习模型证明了它们在优化职业选择途径和训练干预方面的适用性,以实现军事环境中的理想表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信