How can scientific inquiry groups improve learning performance? ——Analysis based on the combination of NCA and fsQCA

IF 4.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Xiaoyue Wang , Cixiao Wang
{"title":"How can scientific inquiry groups improve learning performance? ——Analysis based on the combination of NCA and fsQCA","authors":"Xiaoyue Wang ,&nbsp;Cixiao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Collaborative problem-solving (CPS) ability is the core quality necessary for students' current study and future work. The performance of CPS in practical teaching contexts is affected by a combination of multiple factors. Revealing the mechanism of complex and diverse group characteristics on CPS level is a breakthrough in current research.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>The paper intends to integrate structural, motivational, and interactive characteristics of groups to explore their synergistic pathways in influencing the effectiveness of CPS within groups.</div></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><div>Participants were 129 primary school students.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study created guided problem-solving scenarios. Students worked in groups of 5–6, conducted two rounds of scientific inquiry activities, and completed a group worksheet and a reflective questionnaire.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This paper found that the learning performance of scientific inquiry groups is the result of the synergistic effect of various group characteristics. Groups with high-quality performance demonstrate three driving patterns: high morale groups riven by high information interaction, heterogeneous groups driven by high motivation and information interaction, and heterogeneous groups driven by interpersonal interaction. Moreover, the characteristics of interpersonal interaction or information interaction are essential to achieve high-quality group performance. High-quality group performance can't be separated from the group characteristics of heterogeneity, learning motivation or self-efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>For cultivating CPS skills., teachers should comprehensively consider multiple group characteristics and create favorable group conditions through group design. They should also promote collaborative communication through value guidance and rule establishment., and enhance the effectiveness of information interaction by designing external learning support, thereby improving group learning performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 102135"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475225000593","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Collaborative problem-solving (CPS) ability is the core quality necessary for students' current study and future work. The performance of CPS in practical teaching contexts is affected by a combination of multiple factors. Revealing the mechanism of complex and diverse group characteristics on CPS level is a breakthrough in current research.

Aims

The paper intends to integrate structural, motivational, and interactive characteristics of groups to explore their synergistic pathways in influencing the effectiveness of CPS within groups.

Sample

Participants were 129 primary school students.

Methods

This study created guided problem-solving scenarios. Students worked in groups of 5–6, conducted two rounds of scientific inquiry activities, and completed a group worksheet and a reflective questionnaire.

Results

This paper found that the learning performance of scientific inquiry groups is the result of the synergistic effect of various group characteristics. Groups with high-quality performance demonstrate three driving patterns: high morale groups riven by high information interaction, heterogeneous groups driven by high motivation and information interaction, and heterogeneous groups driven by interpersonal interaction. Moreover, the characteristics of interpersonal interaction or information interaction are essential to achieve high-quality group performance. High-quality group performance can't be separated from the group characteristics of heterogeneity, learning motivation or self-efficacy.

Conclusions

For cultivating CPS skills., teachers should comprehensively consider multiple group characteristics and create favorable group conditions through group design. They should also promote collaborative communication through value guidance and rule establishment., and enhance the effectiveness of information interaction by designing external learning support, thereby improving group learning performance.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信