A systematic survey of hybrid ML techniques for predicting peak particle velocity (PPV) in open-cast mine blasting operations

IF 10.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Gundaveni Shylaja, Ragam Prashanth
{"title":"A systematic survey of hybrid ML techniques for predicting peak particle velocity (PPV) in open-cast mine blasting operations","authors":"Gundaveni Shylaja,&nbsp;Ragam Prashanth","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11156-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Blasting operations in open-cast mines, while essential for mineral extraction, can generate significant peak particle velocity (PPV), posing environmental and structural risks. Accurate PPV prediction is critical to mitigate these effects and optimize blasting practices. This review introduces a hybrid ML approach that combines traditional methods, such as decision trees and SVMs, with advanced techniques like ensemble learning and neural networks. The performance of these models is evaluated based on blast parameters, geographical conditions, and monitoring data. The study highlights that hybrid and ensemble methods outperform other techniques in the majority of cases, especially in surface blasting scenarios. The increasing use of these advanced methods underscores their potential to address key challenges in blasting operations. Hybrid machine learning models over traditional methods by combining the strengths of multiple algorithms, effectively reducing bias and variance while enhancing predictive accuracy. Unlike conventional models, which often struggle with nonlinear relationships and high-dimensional data, hybrid approaches leverage advanced feature engineering, ensemble learning, and optimization techniques to improve robustness and generalization. In our study, these models demonstrated superior reliability in predicting PPV, achieving higher accuracy in terms of RMSE and <span>\\(\\text {R}^2\\)</span>. By combining different techniques, they mitigate individual model weaknesses, reduce errors, and improve feature selection. In addition, hybrid models prevent overfitting and optimize predictions through ensemble strategies such as boosting and stacking. This study explores the advantages of hybrid ML models, demonstrating their superior performance compared to conventional approaches. The review also identifies gaps in research on underground blasting and suggests future directions, emphasizing the importance of ongoing technological advancements and industry awareness of ML techniques benefits. Enhanced accuracy and robustness in PPV prediction, driven by hybrid approaches and real-time systems, are crucial to improve safety and efficiency in mining operations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11156-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11156-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blasting operations in open-cast mines, while essential for mineral extraction, can generate significant peak particle velocity (PPV), posing environmental and structural risks. Accurate PPV prediction is critical to mitigate these effects and optimize blasting practices. This review introduces a hybrid ML approach that combines traditional methods, such as decision trees and SVMs, with advanced techniques like ensemble learning and neural networks. The performance of these models is evaluated based on blast parameters, geographical conditions, and monitoring data. The study highlights that hybrid and ensemble methods outperform other techniques in the majority of cases, especially in surface blasting scenarios. The increasing use of these advanced methods underscores their potential to address key challenges in blasting operations. Hybrid machine learning models over traditional methods by combining the strengths of multiple algorithms, effectively reducing bias and variance while enhancing predictive accuracy. Unlike conventional models, which often struggle with nonlinear relationships and high-dimensional data, hybrid approaches leverage advanced feature engineering, ensemble learning, and optimization techniques to improve robustness and generalization. In our study, these models demonstrated superior reliability in predicting PPV, achieving higher accuracy in terms of RMSE and \(\text {R}^2\). By combining different techniques, they mitigate individual model weaknesses, reduce errors, and improve feature selection. In addition, hybrid models prevent overfitting and optimize predictions through ensemble strategies such as boosting and stacking. This study explores the advantages of hybrid ML models, demonstrating their superior performance compared to conventional approaches. The review also identifies gaps in research on underground blasting and suggests future directions, emphasizing the importance of ongoing technological advancements and industry awareness of ML techniques benefits. Enhanced accuracy and robustness in PPV prediction, driven by hybrid approaches and real-time systems, are crucial to improve safety and efficiency in mining operations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信