The Developmental Puzzle of Irony Understanding: Is Epistemic Vigilance the Missing Piece?

IF 1.7 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Ana Milosavljevic, Thomas Castelain, Nausicaa Pouscoulous, Diana Mazzarella
{"title":"The Developmental Puzzle of Irony Understanding: Is Epistemic Vigilance the Missing Piece?","authors":"Ana Milosavljevic, Thomas Castelain, Nausicaa Pouscoulous, Diana Mazzarella","doi":"10.1017/s0305000925000091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The prolonged developmental window of irony understanding opens up the question of which socio-cognitive repertoire underlies this pragmatic capacity. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between epistemic vigilance and irony understanding in 5/6- and 6/7-year-old children using a picture selection task. We assessed children’s vigilance towards unreliable informants and manipulated the reliability of the irony target. Our findings confirm that irony comprehension is a late-emerging skill and highlight the need to differentiate its full-fledged understanding from mere sensitivity to contextual mismatches. While irony understanding was not affected by our reliability manipulation, our findings revealed that more vigilant children were better at irony understanding than less vigilant ones. This provides the first empirical evidence that epistemic vigilance is a good predictor of irony performance and lays the ground for future research on the intricate relationship between these two capacities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Language","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000925000091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prolonged developmental window of irony understanding opens up the question of which socio-cognitive repertoire underlies this pragmatic capacity. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between epistemic vigilance and irony understanding in 5/6- and 6/7-year-old children using a picture selection task. We assessed children’s vigilance towards unreliable informants and manipulated the reliability of the irony target. Our findings confirm that irony comprehension is a late-emerging skill and highlight the need to differentiate its full-fledged understanding from mere sensitivity to contextual mismatches. While irony understanding was not affected by our reliability manipulation, our findings revealed that more vigilant children were better at irony understanding than less vigilant ones. This provides the first empirical evidence that epistemic vigilance is a good predictor of irony performance and lays the ground for future research on the intricate relationship between these two capacities.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: A key publication in the field, Journal of Child Language publishes articles on all aspects of the scientific study of language behaviour in children, the principles which underlie it, and the theories which may account for it. The international range of authors and breadth of coverage allow the journal to forge links between many different areas of research including psychology, linguistics, cognitive science and anthropology. This interdisciplinary approach spans a wide range of interests: phonology, phonetics, morphology, syntax, vocabulary, semantics, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, or any other recognised facet of language study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信