Species identification in meat products using quantitative and qualitative PCR techniques, with emphasis on chicken detection

IF 4.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Zahra Sarlak , Nayebali Rezvani , Ehsan Parandi , Nasrin Karami , Maryam Azizi-Lalabadi , Milad Rouhi
{"title":"Species identification in meat products using quantitative and qualitative PCR techniques, with emphasis on chicken detection","authors":"Zahra Sarlak ,&nbsp;Nayebali Rezvani ,&nbsp;Ehsan Parandi ,&nbsp;Nasrin Karami ,&nbsp;Maryam Azizi-Lalabadi ,&nbsp;Milad Rouhi","doi":"10.1016/j.fbio.2025.106568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Undeclared adulteration of chicken in processed meat products is commonly reported because of easier and cheaper access. As a result, authenticating techniques should be applied to evaluate their existence in these products. The DNA's higher stability during processing than lipids and proteins makes DNA-based techniques ideal for meat authenticity and traceability. Among these, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques are reliable, highly sensitive, and specific for detecting species origin in foodstuffs. DNA-based methods are divided into two categories including qualitative (species-specific PCR, PCR-RFLP, and DNA barcoding) and quantitative (real-time PCR, droplet-digital PCR, and next-generation sequencing-based DNA metabarcoding) assays. Therefore, the present review intends to critically investigate the principles, advantages, challenges, and advances of PCR techniques, and their practicality for the detection of undeclared chicken in meat products. Among qualitative PCR techniques, capillary and microchip electrophoresis assays could simultaneously detect the animal species with a lower limit of detection than traditional gel electrophoresis. Nevertheless, the detection of undeclared species may occur due to accidental cross-contamination with minute quantities of various meat species during food processing. Quantitative PCR methods, on the other hand, are capable of distinguishing between deliberate and unintentional mislabeling. Additionally, despite the higher cost, NGS-assisted DNA sequencing surpasses other species authentication methods as it can quantitatively identify all target and non-target species using high-quality barcode sequence reference databases. This review could act as a reference guide for researchers, DNA-based technique developers, and regulatory authorities seeking to enhance the global standard protocol for chicken identification in meat products through PCR methodologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12409,"journal":{"name":"Food Bioscience","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 106568"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Bioscience","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212429225007448","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Undeclared adulteration of chicken in processed meat products is commonly reported because of easier and cheaper access. As a result, authenticating techniques should be applied to evaluate their existence in these products. The DNA's higher stability during processing than lipids and proteins makes DNA-based techniques ideal for meat authenticity and traceability. Among these, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques are reliable, highly sensitive, and specific for detecting species origin in foodstuffs. DNA-based methods are divided into two categories including qualitative (species-specific PCR, PCR-RFLP, and DNA barcoding) and quantitative (real-time PCR, droplet-digital PCR, and next-generation sequencing-based DNA metabarcoding) assays. Therefore, the present review intends to critically investigate the principles, advantages, challenges, and advances of PCR techniques, and their practicality for the detection of undeclared chicken in meat products. Among qualitative PCR techniques, capillary and microchip electrophoresis assays could simultaneously detect the animal species with a lower limit of detection than traditional gel electrophoresis. Nevertheless, the detection of undeclared species may occur due to accidental cross-contamination with minute quantities of various meat species during food processing. Quantitative PCR methods, on the other hand, are capable of distinguishing between deliberate and unintentional mislabeling. Additionally, despite the higher cost, NGS-assisted DNA sequencing surpasses other species authentication methods as it can quantitatively identify all target and non-target species using high-quality barcode sequence reference databases. This review could act as a reference guide for researchers, DNA-based technique developers, and regulatory authorities seeking to enhance the global standard protocol for chicken identification in meat products through PCR methodologies.

Abstract Image

利用定量和定性PCR技术鉴定肉制品中的物种,重点是鸡肉的检测
未经申报的鸡肉掺假加工肉制品经常被报道,因为更容易和更便宜的获取。因此,应该应用认证技术来评估它们在这些产品中的存在性。DNA在加工过程中比脂质和蛋白质具有更高的稳定性,这使得基于DNA的技术成为肉类真实性和可追溯性的理想选择。其中,聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术可靠,灵敏度高,特异性强,可用于检测食品中的物种来源。基于DNA的方法分为两类,包括定性(物种特异性PCR, PCR- rflp和DNA条形码)和定量(实时PCR,液滴数字PCR和下一代基于测序的DNA元条形码)分析。因此,本综述旨在批判性地研究PCR技术的原理、优势、挑战和进展,以及它们在肉制品中检测未申报鸡肉的实用性。在定性PCR技术中,毛细管电泳和微芯片电泳可同时检测动物种类,且检测限低于传统凝胶电泳。然而,由于在食品加工过程中与微量的各种肉类偶然交叉污染,可能会检测到未申报的物种。定量PCR方法,另一方面,能够区分故意和无意的错误标记。此外,尽管成本较高,但ngs辅助的DNA测序方法优于其他物种认证方法,因为它可以使用高质量的条形码序列参考数据库定量识别所有目标和非目标物种。这篇综述可以作为研究人员、基于dna的技术开发人员和监管机构的参考指南,以寻求通过PCR方法加强肉制品中鸡肉鉴定的全球标准方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Bioscience
Food Bioscience Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.80%
发文量
671
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Food Bioscience is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to provide a forum for recent developments in the field of bio-related food research. The journal focuses on both fundamental and applied research worldwide, with special attention to ethnic and cultural aspects of food bioresearch.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信