Brown-shell eggs shows high incidence of blood and meat spots accompanied by unique microbial distribution patterns.

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Frontiers in Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-03-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnut.2025.1561194
Junfeng Wu, Yiyuan Yan, Jiahua Chen, Junying Li, Guangqi Li, Guiqin Wu, Bin Wang, Gang Zheng, Yuqin Yang, Yushuang Du, Ling Lian
{"title":"Brown-shell eggs shows high incidence of blood and meat spots accompanied by unique microbial distribution patterns.","authors":"Junfeng Wu, Yiyuan Yan, Jiahua Chen, Junying Li, Guangqi Li, Guiqin Wu, Bin Wang, Gang Zheng, Yuqin Yang, Yushuang Du, Ling Lian","doi":"10.3389/fnut.2025.1561194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The blood and meat spots in eggs are recognized as defects for egg quality. The frequency of blood and meat spots in brown-shell eggs is much higher than that in white-shell eggs in previous studies. However, the actual occurrence frequency and their effects on the microbial composition in eggs remain poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we examined the frequency of blood and meat spots in brown-shell and white-shell eggs, respectively, from Rhode Island Red and White Leghorn chickens at seven ages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that blood and meat spots in brown-shell eggs exhibit much higher average frequency (63.99%) than that in white-shell eggs (1.37%). Furthermore, we analyzed the relationship between the presence of blood and meat spots and the microbial community distribution in the egg albumen and yolk. Briefly, we selected brown-shell eggs (<i>n</i> = 112) from Rhode Island Red, among which 51 eggs showing blood/meat spots were classified as RIR_CASE, and 61 normal eggs without blood/meat spot were classified as RIR_CON. Additional white-eggshell eggs (<i>n</i> = 124) without blood/meat spots from White Leghorn were selected as WL_CON. 16S rRNA sequencing was performed in both egg white and yolk. The results indicated that neither egg white nor yolk is sterile, with Proteobacteria identified as the dominant bacterial phyla. The microbial alpha diversity in both egg white and yolk of RIR_CASE was significantly lower compared to RIR_CON and WL_CON. Beta diversity analysis showed that the Weighted UniFrac Distance between RIR_CASE and RIR_CON in the egg yolk group was significantly larger than the distance between WL_CON and RIR_CON. It suggested that the difference of microbial diversity was mainly caused by blood and meat spots other than by chicken breeds. LEfSe analysis identified eight microbial taxa closely linked to the presence of blood and meat spots in egg white or yolk. Moreover, through the combination of random forest analysis, we identified the unique microbial biomarkers Comamonas_F and Chryseobacterium in the egg white of the RIR_CASE group.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study indicates that eggs with blood and meat spots occur at a higher frequency in brown-shell chickens and are accompanied by a distinct microbial community distribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":12473,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nutrition","volume":"12 ","pages":"1561194"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1561194","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The blood and meat spots in eggs are recognized as defects for egg quality. The frequency of blood and meat spots in brown-shell eggs is much higher than that in white-shell eggs in previous studies. However, the actual occurrence frequency and their effects on the microbial composition in eggs remain poorly understood.

Methods: In this study, we examined the frequency of blood and meat spots in brown-shell and white-shell eggs, respectively, from Rhode Island Red and White Leghorn chickens at seven ages.

Results: The results showed that blood and meat spots in brown-shell eggs exhibit much higher average frequency (63.99%) than that in white-shell eggs (1.37%). Furthermore, we analyzed the relationship between the presence of blood and meat spots and the microbial community distribution in the egg albumen and yolk. Briefly, we selected brown-shell eggs (n = 112) from Rhode Island Red, among which 51 eggs showing blood/meat spots were classified as RIR_CASE, and 61 normal eggs without blood/meat spot were classified as RIR_CON. Additional white-eggshell eggs (n = 124) without blood/meat spots from White Leghorn were selected as WL_CON. 16S rRNA sequencing was performed in both egg white and yolk. The results indicated that neither egg white nor yolk is sterile, with Proteobacteria identified as the dominant bacterial phyla. The microbial alpha diversity in both egg white and yolk of RIR_CASE was significantly lower compared to RIR_CON and WL_CON. Beta diversity analysis showed that the Weighted UniFrac Distance between RIR_CASE and RIR_CON in the egg yolk group was significantly larger than the distance between WL_CON and RIR_CON. It suggested that the difference of microbial diversity was mainly caused by blood and meat spots other than by chicken breeds. LEfSe analysis identified eight microbial taxa closely linked to the presence of blood and meat spots in egg white or yolk. Moreover, through the combination of random forest analysis, we identified the unique microbial biomarkers Comamonas_F and Chryseobacterium in the egg white of the RIR_CASE group.

Discussion: Our study indicates that eggs with blood and meat spots occur at a higher frequency in brown-shell chickens and are accompanied by a distinct microbial community distribution.

褐壳蛋的血斑和肉斑发生率高,且有独特的微生物分布模式。
鸡蛋中的血斑和肉斑被认为是鸡蛋质量的缺陷。在以往的研究中,棕壳鸡蛋出现血斑和肉斑的频率远高于白壳鸡蛋。然而,实际发生频率及其对鸡蛋微生物组成的影响仍然知之甚少。方法:对罗得岛红来客那鸡和白来客那鸡7日龄褐壳蛋和白壳蛋中出现血斑和肉斑的频率进行了检测。结果:褐壳蛋血斑和肉斑的平均出现频率(63.99%)明显高于白壳蛋(1.37%);此外,我们还分析了血斑和肉斑的存在与鸡蛋蛋白和蛋黄中微生物群落分布的关系。简单地说,我们选择了来自Rhode Island Red的棕壳鸡蛋(n = 112),其中51个鸡蛋有血/肉斑被归类为RIR_CASE, 61个没有血/肉斑的正常鸡蛋被归类为RIR_CON。选取白来客霍恩无血/肉斑的白蛋壳蛋(n = 124)作为WL_CON。蛋白和蛋黄均进行16S rRNA测序。结果表明,蛋清和蛋黄都不是无菌的,以变形菌门为优势菌门。与对照组和对照组相比,对照组蛋清和蛋黄中α微生物多样性显著降低。Beta多样性分析表明,蛋黄组的RIR_CASE与RIR_CON之间的加权UniFrac距离显著大于WL_CON与RIR_CON之间的距离。结果表明,微生物多样性的差异主要是由血斑和肉斑引起的,而不是由鸡的品种引起的。LEfSe分析鉴定出8个微生物类群与蛋清或蛋黄中的血斑和肉斑密切相关。此外,通过结合随机森林分析,我们在RIR_CASE组的蛋清中发现了独特的微生物生物标志物Comamonas_F和Chryseobacterium。讨论:我们的研究表明,带血和肉斑的鸡蛋在褐壳鸡中出现的频率更高,并且伴随着不同的微生物群落分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Nutrition
Frontiers in Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
2891
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: No subject pertains more to human life than nutrition. The aim of Frontiers in Nutrition is to integrate major scientific disciplines in this vast field in order to address the most relevant and pertinent questions and developments. Our ambition is to create an integrated podium based on original research, clinical trials, and contemporary reviews to build a reputable knowledge forum in the domains of human health, dietary behaviors, agronomy & 21st century food science. Through the recognized open-access Frontiers platform we welcome manuscripts to our dedicated sections relating to different areas in the field of nutrition with a focus on human health. Specialty sections in Frontiers in Nutrition include, for example, Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition & Sustainable Diets, Nutrition and Food Science Technology, Nutrition Methodology, Sport & Exercise Nutrition, Food Chemistry, and Nutritional Immunology. Based on the publication of rigorous scientific research, we thrive to achieve a visible impact on the global nutrition agenda addressing the grand challenges of our time, including obesity, malnutrition, hunger, food waste, sustainability and consumer health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信