Palliative Care Referral Patterns and Outcomes for Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease at an Academic Liver Transplant Center.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1089/jpm.2024.0171
Brittany L Waterman, Adam R Ketner, Jason A Benedict, Sarah Ehrman, Caitlin Bennett, Laura J Rush, Jennifer L Eramo, Halia L Melnyk, Gennaro Di Tosto, Julia L Agne, Erin Stevens, Lynn A Fussner, Ann Scheck McAlearney, Sean G Kelly
{"title":"Palliative Care Referral Patterns and Outcomes for Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease at an Academic Liver Transplant Center.","authors":"Brittany L Waterman, Adam R Ketner, Jason A Benedict, Sarah Ehrman, Caitlin Bennett, Laura J Rush, Jennifer L Eramo, Halia L Melnyk, Gennaro Di Tosto, Julia L Agne, Erin Stevens, Lynn A Fussner, Ann Scheck McAlearney, Sean G Kelly","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2024.0171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) have complex needs and may benefit from palliative care (PC), which is often underutilized or delayed. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To characterize patients with ESLD who received inpatient PC consultation and to explore differences in characteristics between those who received PC consultation before (pre-Pall) or after (post-Pall) PC participation at weekly liver transplant (LT) Patient Selection Committee (PSC) meetings. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Single-center retrospective cohort study. <b><i>Setting/Subjects:</i></b> Hospitalized patients with ESLD who received inpatient PC consultation between February 2017 and February 2019 at an academic LT center in the United States. <b><i>Measurements:</i></b> PC referral reasons and timing, code status, hospice referrals, discharge location, and mortality. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Two hundred five patients were included. The primary reason for PC was goals of care (88.8%; <i>n</i> = 182). Most (86.8%; <i>n</i> = 178) were Full Code at hospital admission, while 81% (<i>n</i> = 166) were do-not-resuscitate at discharge. Nearly one quarter (22.9%; <i>n</i> = 47) sought life-prolonging care at discharge, while 41.5% (<i>n</i> = 85) were discharged with hospice, and 34.1% (<i>n</i> = 70) died before discharge. By the end of the study, 85.9% (<i>n</i> = 176) were confirmed as deceased. Median time from PC to hospice referral was 12 days [95% confidence interval [CI]: 8-23]. Median time from PC consult to death was 13 days [95% CI: 9-17] and from hospice referral to death was 7 days [95% CI: 4-13]. There were no statistically significant differences between the pre- and post-Pall groups related to PC referral patterns or outcomes. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Most PC contacts occurred near end of life, and many led to comfort-focused care. Late referrals may be due to reliance on inpatient consults during acute illness. PC presence at PSC meetings represents an important step in collaboration with LT teams but did not lead to direct impact on PC referral patterns or outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"601-610"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13472534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2024.0171","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) have complex needs and may benefit from palliative care (PC), which is often underutilized or delayed. Objectives: To characterize patients with ESLD who received inpatient PC consultation and to explore differences in characteristics between those who received PC consultation before (pre-Pall) or after (post-Pall) PC participation at weekly liver transplant (LT) Patient Selection Committee (PSC) meetings. Design: Single-center retrospective cohort study. Setting/Subjects: Hospitalized patients with ESLD who received inpatient PC consultation between February 2017 and February 2019 at an academic LT center in the United States. Measurements: PC referral reasons and timing, code status, hospice referrals, discharge location, and mortality. Results: Two hundred five patients were included. The primary reason for PC was goals of care (88.8%; n = 182). Most (86.8%; n = 178) were Full Code at hospital admission, while 81% (n = 166) were do-not-resuscitate at discharge. Nearly one quarter (22.9%; n = 47) sought life-prolonging care at discharge, while 41.5% (n = 85) were discharged with hospice, and 34.1% (n = 70) died before discharge. By the end of the study, 85.9% (n = 176) were confirmed as deceased. Median time from PC to hospice referral was 12 days [95% confidence interval [CI]: 8-23]. Median time from PC consult to death was 13 days [95% CI: 9-17] and from hospice referral to death was 7 days [95% CI: 4-13]. There were no statistically significant differences between the pre- and post-Pall groups related to PC referral patterns or outcomes. Conclusions: Most PC contacts occurred near end of life, and many led to comfort-focused care. Late referrals may be due to reliance on inpatient consults during acute illness. PC presence at PSC meetings represents an important step in collaboration with LT teams but did not lead to direct impact on PC referral patterns or outcomes.

学术肝移植中心终末期肝病患者的姑息治疗转诊模式和结果。
背景:终末期肝病(ESLD)患者有复杂的需求,可能受益于姑息治疗(PC),但这种治疗往往未得到充分利用或延迟。目的:对接受住院PC会诊的ESLD患者进行特征分析,并探讨在参加每周一次肝移植(LT)患者选择委员会(PSC)会议之前(pall前)或之后(pall后)PC会诊前接受PC会诊的患者之间的特征差异。设计:单中心回顾性队列研究。背景/受试者:2017年2月至2019年2月在美国一家学术LT中心接受住院PC咨询的ESLD住院患者。测量:PC转诊的原因和时间、代码状态、安宁疗护转诊、出院地点和死亡率。结果:纳入225例患者。PC的主要原因是护理目标(88.8%;N = 182)。大部分(86.8%;n = 178)入院时为Full Code,而81% (n = 166)出院时未复苏。近四分之一(22.9%);47人在出院时寻求延长生命的护理,41.5%(85人)在出院时接受临终关怀,34.1%(70人)在出院前死亡。到研究结束时,85.9% (n = 176)被确认死亡。从PC到临终关怀转介的中位时间为12天[95%置信区间[CI]: 8-23]。从PC会诊到死亡的中位时间为13天[95% CI: 9-17],从临终关怀转介到死亡的中位时间为7天[95% CI: 4-13]。pall前后两组在PC转诊模式或结果方面没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:大多数PC接触发生在生命末期,许多接触导致了以舒适为重点的护理。延迟转诊可能是由于依赖急性疾病期间的住院咨询。PC参加PSC会议代表了与LT团队合作的重要一步,但不会直接影响PC的转诊模式或结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of palliative medicine
Journal of palliative medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
345
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Palliative Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering medical, psychosocial, policy, and legal issues in end-of-life care and relief of suffering for patients with intractable pain. The Journal presents essential information for professionals in hospice/palliative medicine, focusing on improving quality of life for patients and their families, and the latest developments in drug and non-drug treatments. The companion biweekly eNewsletter, Briefings in Palliative Medicine, delivers the latest breaking news and information to keep clinicians and health care providers continuously updated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书