The state of food composition databases: data attributes and FAIR data harmonization in the era of digital innovation.

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Frontiers in Nutrition Pub Date : 2025-03-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnut.2025.1552367
Sarah Brinkley, Jenny J Gallo-Franco, Natalia Vázquez-Manjarrez, Juliana Chaura, Naa K A Quartey, Sahar B Toulabi, Melanie T Odenkirk, Eva Jermendi, Marie-Angélique Laporte, Herman E Lutterodt, Reginald A Annan, Mariana Barboza, Endale Amare, Warangkana Srichamnong, Andres Jaramillo-Botero, Gina Kennedy, Jaclyn Bertoldo, Jessica E Prenni, Maya Rajasekharan, John de la Parra, Selena Ahmed
{"title":"The state of food composition databases: data attributes and FAIR data harmonization in the era of digital innovation.","authors":"Sarah Brinkley, Jenny J Gallo-Franco, Natalia Vázquez-Manjarrez, Juliana Chaura, Naa K A Quartey, Sahar B Toulabi, Melanie T Odenkirk, Eva Jermendi, Marie-Angélique Laporte, Herman E Lutterodt, Reginald A Annan, Mariana Barboza, Endale Amare, Warangkana Srichamnong, Andres Jaramillo-Botero, Gina Kennedy, Jaclyn Bertoldo, Jessica E Prenni, Maya Rajasekharan, John de la Parra, Selena Ahmed","doi":"10.3389/fnut.2025.1552367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Food composition databases (FCDBs) are essential resources for characterizing, documenting, and advancing scientific understanding of food quality across the entire spectrum of edible biodiversity. This knowledge supports a wide range of applications with societal impact spanning the global food system. To maximize the utility of food composition data, FCDBs must adhere to criteria such as validated analytical methods, high-resolution metadata, and FAIR Data Principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable). However, complexity and variability in food data pose significant challenges to meeting these standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we conducted an integrative review of 35 data attributes across 101 FCDBs from 110 countries. The data attributes were categorized into three groups: general database information, foods and components, and FAIRness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings reveal evaluated databases show substantial variability in scope and content, with the number of foods and components ranging from few to thousands. FCDBs with the highest numbers of food samples (≥1,102) and components (≥244) tend to rely on secondary data sourced from scientific articles or other FCDBs. In contrast, databases with fewer food samples and components predominantly feature primary analytical data generated in-house. Notably, only one-third of FCDBs reported data on more than 100 food components. FCDBs were infrequently updated, with web-based interfaces being updated more frequently than static tables. When assessed for FAIR compliance, all FCDBs met the criteria for Findability. However, aggregated scores for Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability for the reviewed FCDBs were 30, 69, and 43%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These scores reflect limitations in inadequate metadata, lack of scientific naming, and unclear data reuse notices. Notably, these results are associated with country economic classification, as databases from high-income countries showed greater inclusion of primary data, web-based interfaces, more regular updates, and strong adherence to FAIR principles. Our integrative review presents the current state of FCDBs highlighting emerging opportunities and recommendations. By fostering a deeper understanding of food composition, diverse stakeholders across food systems will be better equipped to address societal challenges, leveraging data-driven solutions to support human and planetary health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12473,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nutrition","volume":"12 ","pages":"1552367"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2025.1552367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Food composition databases (FCDBs) are essential resources for characterizing, documenting, and advancing scientific understanding of food quality across the entire spectrum of edible biodiversity. This knowledge supports a wide range of applications with societal impact spanning the global food system. To maximize the utility of food composition data, FCDBs must adhere to criteria such as validated analytical methods, high-resolution metadata, and FAIR Data Principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable). However, complexity and variability in food data pose significant challenges to meeting these standards.

Methods: In this study, we conducted an integrative review of 35 data attributes across 101 FCDBs from 110 countries. The data attributes were categorized into three groups: general database information, foods and components, and FAIRness.

Results: Our findings reveal evaluated databases show substantial variability in scope and content, with the number of foods and components ranging from few to thousands. FCDBs with the highest numbers of food samples (≥1,102) and components (≥244) tend to rely on secondary data sourced from scientific articles or other FCDBs. In contrast, databases with fewer food samples and components predominantly feature primary analytical data generated in-house. Notably, only one-third of FCDBs reported data on more than 100 food components. FCDBs were infrequently updated, with web-based interfaces being updated more frequently than static tables. When assessed for FAIR compliance, all FCDBs met the criteria for Findability. However, aggregated scores for Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability for the reviewed FCDBs were 30, 69, and 43%, respectively.

Discussion: These scores reflect limitations in inadequate metadata, lack of scientific naming, and unclear data reuse notices. Notably, these results are associated with country economic classification, as databases from high-income countries showed greater inclusion of primary data, web-based interfaces, more regular updates, and strong adherence to FAIR principles. Our integrative review presents the current state of FCDBs highlighting emerging opportunities and recommendations. By fostering a deeper understanding of food composition, diverse stakeholders across food systems will be better equipped to address societal challenges, leveraging data-driven solutions to support human and planetary health.

食品成分数据库现状:数字创新时代的数据属性与FAIR数据协调。
食品成分数据库(fcdb)是表征、记录和促进对整个食用生物多样性范围内食品质量的科学理解的重要资源。这些知识支持广泛的应用,具有跨越全球粮食系统的社会影响。为了最大限度地利用食品成分数据,fcdb必须遵守标准,如经过验证的分析方法、高分辨率元数据和FAIR数据原则(可查找、可访问、可互操作和可重复使用)。然而,食品数据的复杂性和可变性对满足这些标准构成了重大挑战。方法:在本研究中,我们对来自110个国家的101个fcdb的35个数据属性进行了综合回顾。数据属性分为三组:一般数据库信息、食品和成分以及公平性。结果:我们的研究结果表明,评估的数据库在范围和内容上显示出实质性的变化,食品和成分的数量从少数到数千不等。食品样本(≥1102)和成分(≥244)数量最多的fcbs往往依赖于来自科学文章或其他fcbs的二手数据。相比之下,具有较少食品样品和成分的数据库主要以内部生成的原始分析数据为特征。值得注意的是,只有三分之一的fcbs报告了100多种食品成分的数据。fcdb很少更新,基于web的接口比静态表更新得更频繁。当对FAIR合规性进行评估时,所有fcdb都符合可查找性标准。然而,评审的fcdb的可访问性、互操作性和可重用性的总得分分别是30%、69%和43%。讨论:这些分数反映了元数据不足、缺乏科学命名和不明确的数据重用通知的局限性。值得注意的是,这些结果与国家经济分类有关,因为来自高收入国家的数据库显示出更多的原始数据,基于网络的界面,更定期的更新,以及对公平原则的严格遵守。我们的综合综述介绍了fcdb的现状,突出了新出现的机会和建议。通过加深对食物成分的了解,粮食系统中的不同利益攸关方将更好地应对社会挑战,利用数据驱动的解决方案来支持人类和地球健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Nutrition
Frontiers in Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
2891
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: No subject pertains more to human life than nutrition. The aim of Frontiers in Nutrition is to integrate major scientific disciplines in this vast field in order to address the most relevant and pertinent questions and developments. Our ambition is to create an integrated podium based on original research, clinical trials, and contemporary reviews to build a reputable knowledge forum in the domains of human health, dietary behaviors, agronomy & 21st century food science. Through the recognized open-access Frontiers platform we welcome manuscripts to our dedicated sections relating to different areas in the field of nutrition with a focus on human health. Specialty sections in Frontiers in Nutrition include, for example, Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition & Sustainable Diets, Nutrition and Food Science Technology, Nutrition Methodology, Sport & Exercise Nutrition, Food Chemistry, and Nutritional Immunology. Based on the publication of rigorous scientific research, we thrive to achieve a visible impact on the global nutrition agenda addressing the grand challenges of our time, including obesity, malnutrition, hunger, food waste, sustainability and consumer health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信