In sync with oneself: spontaneous intrapersonal coordination and the effect of cognitive load.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-03-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2025.1457007
Ramkumar Jagadeesan, Jessica A Grahn
{"title":"In sync with oneself: spontaneous intrapersonal coordination and the effect of cognitive load.","authors":"Ramkumar Jagadeesan, Jessica A Grahn","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2025.1457007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spontaneous intrapersonal coordination is the unintentional coordination of periodic behaviors within an individual. Spontaneous interlimb coordination involving finger-, arm-, foot-, leg- and orofacial muscle movements may be weaker between finger-tapping and walking than between finger-tapping and vocalizing. This could be due to the additional attentional cost of walking, which may be more complex than other periodic movements. Here we compared the coordination stability of simultaneous finger-tapping and walking against simultaneous finger-tapping and repetitive vocalization. We also tested the coordination stability of tapping-walking and tapping-vocalizing under additional cognitive load imposed through concurrent cognitive tasks. Two experiments conceptually replicated spontaneous intrapersonal coordination between the pairs of periodic tasks as well as the effect of concurrent cognitive tasks on coordination stability. To assess coordination, we compared the phase coherence of two periodic tasks, tapping with walking (Experiment 1) or tapping with vocalization (Experiment 2), when produced separately (single task) versus simultaneously (dual task). In the first experiment, participants regularly tapped a microphone while walking, either with no concurrent cognitive task or with concurrent backward counting. In the second experiment, participants tapped while repeating the word \"tick,\" again either with no concurrent cognitive task, or with concurrent visual pattern-matching. Higher spontaneous intrapersonal coordination was evident between periodic tasks when performed simultaneously compared to separately, and lower task coordination stability was evident with a concurrent cognitive task compared to without. These results were in line with past findings. Coordination stability between tapping and walking was lower than that between tapping and ticking overall. This finding supports the categorization of walking as a more complex cognitive task compared to other periodic tasks, as the additional attentional load involved in walking could have resulted in lower coordination stability between tapping and walking. Spontaneous intrapersonal coordination appears sensitive to the attentional costs of performing periodic activities and achieving / maintaining coordination between them.</p>","PeriodicalId":12536,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1457007"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2025.1457007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spontaneous intrapersonal coordination is the unintentional coordination of periodic behaviors within an individual. Spontaneous interlimb coordination involving finger-, arm-, foot-, leg- and orofacial muscle movements may be weaker between finger-tapping and walking than between finger-tapping and vocalizing. This could be due to the additional attentional cost of walking, which may be more complex than other periodic movements. Here we compared the coordination stability of simultaneous finger-tapping and walking against simultaneous finger-tapping and repetitive vocalization. We also tested the coordination stability of tapping-walking and tapping-vocalizing under additional cognitive load imposed through concurrent cognitive tasks. Two experiments conceptually replicated spontaneous intrapersonal coordination between the pairs of periodic tasks as well as the effect of concurrent cognitive tasks on coordination stability. To assess coordination, we compared the phase coherence of two periodic tasks, tapping with walking (Experiment 1) or tapping with vocalization (Experiment 2), when produced separately (single task) versus simultaneously (dual task). In the first experiment, participants regularly tapped a microphone while walking, either with no concurrent cognitive task or with concurrent backward counting. In the second experiment, participants tapped while repeating the word "tick," again either with no concurrent cognitive task, or with concurrent visual pattern-matching. Higher spontaneous intrapersonal coordination was evident between periodic tasks when performed simultaneously compared to separately, and lower task coordination stability was evident with a concurrent cognitive task compared to without. These results were in line with past findings. Coordination stability between tapping and walking was lower than that between tapping and ticking overall. This finding supports the categorization of walking as a more complex cognitive task compared to other periodic tasks, as the additional attentional load involved in walking could have resulted in lower coordination stability between tapping and walking. Spontaneous intrapersonal coordination appears sensitive to the attentional costs of performing periodic activities and achieving / maintaining coordination between them.

与自己同步:自发的个人协调与认知负荷的影响。
自发的个人内部协调是指个体内部周期性行为的无意识协调。自发的肢体间协调包括手指、手臂、脚、腿和口面部肌肉的运动,在敲击手指和走路之间可能比敲击手指和发声之间弱。这可能是由于步行的额外注意力成本,这可能比其他周期性运动更复杂。我们比较了同时敲击手指和走路与同时敲击手指和重复发声的协调稳定性。我们还测试了在并发认知任务施加的额外认知负荷下,敲击-行走和敲击-发声的协调稳定性。两个实验从概念上复制了周期性任务对之间自发的个人协调以及并发认知任务对协调稳定性的影响。为了评估协调性,我们比较了两个周期性任务的相位一致性,即敲打与行走(实验1)或敲打与发声(实验2),分别进行(单任务)和同时进行(双任务)。在第一个实验中,参与者在走路时定期轻敲麦克风,要么没有同时进行的认知任务,要么同时进行逆向计数。在第二个实验中,参与者在重复“滴答”这个词的同时敲击键盘,同样,要么没有同时进行认知任务,要么同时进行视觉模式匹配。与单独执行任务相比,同时执行周期性任务时,自发性的个人协调能力明显提高,而与不执行同步认知任务相比,任务协调稳定性明显降低。这些结果与过去的研究结果一致。总体而言,敲击和行走之间的协调稳定性低于敲击和滴答之间的协调稳定性。与其他周期性任务相比,这一发现支持了走路是一项更复杂的认知任务的分类,因为走路所涉及的额外注意力负荷可能导致敲打和走路之间的协调稳定性降低。自发的个人内部协调似乎对执行周期性活动和实现/维持它们之间的协调的注意成本敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
830
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to understanding the brain mechanisms supporting cognitive and social behavior in humans, and how these mechanisms might be altered in disease states. The last 25 years have seen an explosive growth in both the methods and the theoretical constructs available to study the human brain. Advances in electrophysiological, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, psychophysical, neuropharmacological and computational approaches have provided key insights into the mechanisms of a broad range of human behaviors in both health and disease. Work in human neuroscience ranges from the cognitive domain, including areas such as memory, attention, language and perception to the social domain, with this last subject addressing topics, such as interpersonal interactions, social discourse and emotional regulation. How these processes unfold during development, mature in adulthood and often decline in aging, and how they are altered in a host of developmental, neurological and psychiatric disorders, has become increasingly amenable to human neuroscience research approaches. Work in human neuroscience has influenced many areas of inquiry ranging from social and cognitive psychology to economics, law and public policy. Accordingly, our journal will provide a forum for human research spanning all areas of human cognitive, social, developmental and translational neuroscience using any research approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信