Domain-specific associations between social cognition and aggression in schizophrenia spectrum disorders

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Sarah A. Berretta , Lindsay D. Oliver , Courtland S. Hyatt , Ricardo E. Carrión , Katrin Hänsel , Aristotle Voineskos , Robert W. Buchanan , Anil K. Malhotra , Sunny X. Tang
{"title":"Domain-specific associations between social cognition and aggression in schizophrenia spectrum disorders","authors":"Sarah A. Berretta ,&nbsp;Lindsay D. Oliver ,&nbsp;Courtland S. Hyatt ,&nbsp;Ricardo E. Carrión ,&nbsp;Katrin Hänsel ,&nbsp;Aristotle Voineskos ,&nbsp;Robert W. Buchanan ,&nbsp;Anil K. Malhotra ,&nbsp;Sunny X. Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aggression in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) is rare but elevated relative to the general population. Existing studies have not identified reliable personal predictors of aggression in SSD. In line with social information processing models suggesting that difficulties interpreting social cues and others' intentions may lead to aggression, we evaluated whether social cognitive domains or global social cognition could be modifiable risk factors in SSD.</div><div>We examined aggression and social cognition in 59 participants with SSD and 43 healthy volunteers (HV). Self-reported aggression was measured via the Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPAQ). Social cognition was assessed using five tasks measuring emotion processing, theory of mind, and social perception. Group differences were analyzed using Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon tests. Multiple regressions examined effects of social cognition on aggression, controlling for demographic and clinical covariates. Supplemental mediation analyses tested whether impairments in emotion processing, theory of mind, or overall social cognition explained the relationship between SSD diagnosis and increased aggression.</div><div>Reported aggression was higher in the SSD group, and social cognitive abilities were impaired across domains (<em>p</em> &lt; .001). Better emotion processing (β = −0.35, <em>p</em> = .03) and theory of mind (β = −0.32, <em>p</em> = .03) predicted lower aggression in SSD, even when accounting for demographic and neurocognitive variables. Exploratory models adjusting for overall psychiatric symptom severity showed that theory of mind remained significant, while emotion processing attenuated. However, social cognition did not mediate the relationship between diagnosis and aggression. Future studies should examine other social processing factors, such as attributional bias.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100361"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001325000198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aggression in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) is rare but elevated relative to the general population. Existing studies have not identified reliable personal predictors of aggression in SSD. In line with social information processing models suggesting that difficulties interpreting social cues and others' intentions may lead to aggression, we evaluated whether social cognitive domains or global social cognition could be modifiable risk factors in SSD.
We examined aggression and social cognition in 59 participants with SSD and 43 healthy volunteers (HV). Self-reported aggression was measured via the Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire (RPAQ). Social cognition was assessed using five tasks measuring emotion processing, theory of mind, and social perception. Group differences were analyzed using Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon tests. Multiple regressions examined effects of social cognition on aggression, controlling for demographic and clinical covariates. Supplemental mediation analyses tested whether impairments in emotion processing, theory of mind, or overall social cognition explained the relationship between SSD diagnosis and increased aggression.
Reported aggression was higher in the SSD group, and social cognitive abilities were impaired across domains (p < .001). Better emotion processing (β = −0.35, p = .03) and theory of mind (β = −0.32, p = .03) predicted lower aggression in SSD, even when accounting for demographic and neurocognitive variables. Exploratory models adjusting for overall psychiatric symptom severity showed that theory of mind remained significant, while emotion processing attenuated. However, social cognition did not mediate the relationship between diagnosis and aggression. Future studies should examine other social processing factors, such as attributional bias.
精神分裂症谱系障碍中社会认知与攻击行为之间的特定领域关联
在精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSD)攻击是罕见的,但相对于一般人群升高。现有的研究尚未确定SSD患者攻击行为的可靠的个人预测因素。社会信息加工模型表明,难以解释社会线索和他人意图可能导致攻击,我们评估了社会认知领域或整体社会认知是否可能是SSD的可改变的危险因素。我们对59名SSD参与者和43名健康志愿者(HV)的攻击行为和社会认知进行了研究。采用反应-主动攻击问卷(RPAQ)对自述攻击行为进行测量。社会认知是通过五个任务来评估的:情绪处理、心理理论和社会知觉。采用Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon检验分析组间差异。多元回归检验了社会认知对攻击行为的影响,控制了人口统计学和临床协变量。补充调解分析测试了情绪处理、心理理论或整体社会认知的损伤是否解释了SSD诊断与攻击增加之间的关系。SSD组报告的攻击性更高,社会认知能力在各个领域都受到损害(p <;措施)。更好的情绪处理(β = - 0.35, p = .03)和心理理论(β = - 0.32, p = .03)预示着SSD患者更低的攻击性,即使考虑到人口统计学和神经认知变量。调整整体精神症状严重程度的探索性模型显示,心理理论仍然显著,而情绪加工减弱。然而,社会认知并没有中介诊断与攻击之间的关系。未来的研究应该考察其他社会加工因素,如归因偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信