In Which Cases Is Additional Direct Surgery Useful for Mechanical Thrombectomy Failure?

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurologia medico-chirurgica Pub Date : 2025-05-15 Epub Date: 2025-04-07 DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0295
Takao Koiso, Nakao Ota, Kenichi Haraguchi, Hiroyuki Mizuno, Kosumo Noda, Sadahisa Tokuda, Rokuya Tanikawa
{"title":"In Which Cases Is Additional Direct Surgery Useful for Mechanical Thrombectomy Failure?","authors":"Takao Koiso, Nakao Ota, Kenichi Haraguchi, Hiroyuki Mizuno, Kosumo Noda, Sadahisa Tokuda, Rokuya Tanikawa","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical evidence for adding direct surgery to the management of patients with large vessel occlusion after mechanical thrombectomy failure is limited. We investigated which patients would benefit from the additional surgery. We retrospectively examined factors influencing mechanical thrombectomy success and the outcomes of patients receiving additional direct surgery. Direct surgery was performed in patients younger than 75 years with modified Rankin Scale 0-2 and with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-Clinical mismatch in the middle cerebral artery area on post-mechanical thrombectomy magnetic resonance imaging. To convert the hyperdense artery sign into an objective index, the ratio of the occluded to the normal vessel in Hounsfield Units was calculated (defined as the hyperdense artery sign ratio). A total of 152 patients were included in this study; the median patient age was 77.0 years; 13 patients (8.5%) had posterior circulation occlusion, and effective recanalization was confirmed in 124 patients (82.8%). Multivariable analysis showed the factors significantly associated with successful recanalization to be male gender (p = 0.0020) and a higher hyperdense artery sign ratio (p = 0.0012). The cut-off value of the hyperdense artery sign ratio was 1.05. Additional direct surgery was performed in 6 of 28 patients with mechanical thrombectomy failure. In 5 of these patients, recanalization was not successful even with direct embolectomy, and bypass was added. Patients who underwent direct surgery had better modified Rankin Scale scores at discharge than those who did not (p = 0.0405). The hyperdense artery sign ratio was a predictor of mechanical thrombectomy success; if the hyperdense artery sign ratio was less than 1.05, mechanical thrombectomy was often unsuccessful, and an early conversion to direct surgery was deemed beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":19225,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","volume":" ","pages":"255-261"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical evidence for adding direct surgery to the management of patients with large vessel occlusion after mechanical thrombectomy failure is limited. We investigated which patients would benefit from the additional surgery. We retrospectively examined factors influencing mechanical thrombectomy success and the outcomes of patients receiving additional direct surgery. Direct surgery was performed in patients younger than 75 years with modified Rankin Scale 0-2 and with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-Clinical mismatch in the middle cerebral artery area on post-mechanical thrombectomy magnetic resonance imaging. To convert the hyperdense artery sign into an objective index, the ratio of the occluded to the normal vessel in Hounsfield Units was calculated (defined as the hyperdense artery sign ratio). A total of 152 patients were included in this study; the median patient age was 77.0 years; 13 patients (8.5%) had posterior circulation occlusion, and effective recanalization was confirmed in 124 patients (82.8%). Multivariable analysis showed the factors significantly associated with successful recanalization to be male gender (p = 0.0020) and a higher hyperdense artery sign ratio (p = 0.0012). The cut-off value of the hyperdense artery sign ratio was 1.05. Additional direct surgery was performed in 6 of 28 patients with mechanical thrombectomy failure. In 5 of these patients, recanalization was not successful even with direct embolectomy, and bypass was added. Patients who underwent direct surgery had better modified Rankin Scale scores at discharge than those who did not (p = 0.0405). The hyperdense artery sign ratio was a predictor of mechanical thrombectomy success; if the hyperdense artery sign ratio was less than 1.05, mechanical thrombectomy was often unsuccessful, and an early conversion to direct surgery was deemed beneficial.

在哪些情况下直接手术对机械取栓失败是有用的?
机械取栓失败后大血管闭塞患者增加直接手术治疗的临床证据有限。我们调查了哪些病人会从额外的手术中受益。我们回顾性研究了影响机械取栓成功的因素和接受额外直接手术的患者的结果。年龄小于75岁,修正Rankin评分0-2分,机械取栓后磁共振成像弥散加权成像-脑中动脉区临床不匹配的患者直接手术。为了将高密度动脉征象转化为客观指标,计算阻塞血管与正常血管的Hounsfield单位比值(定义为高密度动脉征象比值)。本研究共纳入152例患者;患者年龄中位数为77.0岁;后循环闭塞13例(8.5%),再通有效124例(82.8%)。多变量分析显示,男性(p = 0.0020)和高密度动脉征象比例较高(p = 0.0012)是影响再通成功的重要因素。高密度动脉征象比值的临界值为1.05。28例机械取栓失败患者中有6例追加直接手术治疗。其中5例患者,即使直接栓塞切除,再通也不成功,并增加了旁路。直接手术患者出院时改良Rankin量表评分优于未手术患者(p = 0.0405)。高密度动脉征象比率是机械取栓成功的预测指标;如果高密度动脉征象比小于1.05,机械取栓往往不成功,早期转为直接手术被认为是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Neurologia medico-chirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信